CIA Agent Tells Truth About Why CIA Overthrow Countries And Hate Socialism
By Dark Politricks
Why is it that the citizens of the richest country in the world cannot have what most of the rest of the world has, and why the CIA feels the needs to destroy any socialist countries that prove that they can provide better health care and education than the great free USA. A country where 30,000 people are now living in tents in LA due to the lockdown policies of California, and their lost jobs, health care and homes.
Nancy Pelosi was recently exposed as an insider dealer, as she bought millions of stock in products like Microsoft and Amazon that she knew would be granted billion dollar contracts with the DOD during the Biden term, plus all the other stock she bought that went up due to the COVID pandemic.
In 2014 it was found out that she was worth over $202 million since becoming a politician - how? I am sure Senators and Congressmen are not paid that well.
Hopefully you are sensible enough to know by know not to get your facts or news from the MSM, BBC, Facebook, Google, or Wikipedia. All companies and news outlets that have recently been found to be working with intelligence agencies, and the establishment to remove accounts that deviate from the established narrative. If you are still getting your news from these sources you really need a bat over your head and a quick read up on "manufacturing consent" by Noam Chomsky.
So why is it that the richest country on earth. One that can print into existence $40+ trillion to pay for CARE bills and Stimulus bills that had more pork in them unrelated to their names that even Donald Trump said he wanted the measly $600 stimulus cheques from his bill to be raised to $2,000, and all the feminist studies for Pakistani Women and speed boats for Sri Lanka removed. Something Nancy Pelosi refused to do before the election as she thought it would make voters more likely to vote for him if they just got cheques with Trump's name on it.
Does it really matter who gives the suffering people of the US aid in their time of need? They have suffered for decades under Republicans and Democrats. They have watched as NAFTA meant all their well paid union jobs were sent overseas, and sat by as Bill Clinton turned the Democrats into Republicans, let Joe Biden introduce the horrible crime bill that locked up millions of poor coloured people for small drug offences, and even created the privatised prison labour system
As George W Bush stood in the smouldering rubble of the WTC and declared that the terrorists wanted to attack us because they hated our freedoms, no-one seemed to do a damn thing about it as he then took them all away from you anyway with the PATRIOT ACT (another Joe Biden hit), the NDDA, and the AUMF (Authorization to Use Military Force), plus of course the ancient act of Habeas corpus, signed by King John in 1215. It leaves American citizens with less liberties and freedoms than a 12th century English serf,
Then "Change" came with Obama. Except as usual, a new President from either party meant business as usual. Lobbyists controlled what he did, Wall St was bailed out as Main St was left to suffer and the only real change was the amount of killing he did. He really is the worst President of recent times.
"I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” -- meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office -- “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” > https://genius.com/General-wesley-clark-seven-countries-in-five-years-annotated
So when you hear your state news either the BBC, or the now CIA controlled MSM in the US talk about humanitarian reasons for going to war, and "sudden uprisings" you should know that your country is willing to spend billions on that but that they refuse to spend a little less on killing people who don't know why they are being targeted and spending it on you. Small items with a cut of DOD spending that could easily afford:
Health Care at the point of entry.
Cheap affordable prescriptions.
Free or cheap education.
Lower or no fee university loans, which youngsters are spending hundreds of dollars on only to come out to find there are no jobs for them.
The prevention of zero privacy and a the build up of a technological surveillance state supported by Google, Twitter and other Silicon Valley companies.
I will leave it to Jimmy Dore to introduce any sheeple who this may be news to, to show clips of CIA agents talking frankly about over-throwing left wing countries, demonising socialist counties and fomenting coups like the one they did in in Belarus the other week.
They aim to control the media so that the weak minded who don't think for themselves or do their own research believe what they are told straight out of the mouths of paid CIA/MI6 news men and women.
Read up on Operation COINTELPRO and MOCKINGBIRD, even Wikipedia can't hide the FACTS that the CIA used illegal methods against their own people. These operations are supposedly stopped now by the CIA, but then they just change the name of the operation and carry on, just like MKULTRA.
Plus as they are now actually appearing on the US news shows as anchors and regular speakers there is little need to use spy craft to get their propaganda over to you. You are being listened to 24/7 by your phone and Alexa, and pushed propaganda that we are really the good guys by our news stations. Do you really believe all that?
As Jimmy says, "the CIA over throw a democratic regime before most people eat breakfast". It's a line, but it's also unfortunately true.
I have just been given this remake of the famous "IF" poem by Rudyard Kipling, it is aimed at our UK PM Boris Johnson, but really it could be aimed at any Western neo-liberal politician, especially those like Nancy Pelosi that make millions on the job. Once elected they totally forget about the people who put them in office and just look after no 1, enriching themselves at ever opportunity, the #FraudSquad included. Have a read....
I am not going to say that much but these are 3 videos all from different points of view that seem to suggest that the senile current President is worse than Trump, if you can believe that. I am not from the USA but as the "leader of the free world", the US POTUS stands for the west, and after Biden's election many countries must be very worried about the handling of global affairs by the "America is back", team of "experienced" officials.
Would the establishment dare let Biden have a live debate with Putin, who called for one after Biden said he had no soul?
When Biden called him a killer, he calmly replied "it takes one to know one” and wished him "good health". Would the establishment dare let Biden have such a live debate where he would no doubt be outflanked and embarrassed by the Russian Premier. Or would they worry that he would forget where he was and be so scared of him making some horrible mistake and embarrassing them, and their country?
From foreign policy and his Secretary of State, Antony Blinken who got tutored live on TV by China recently. Biden's office of experienced officials looks half cocked, and very unexperienced with Biden acting just as a figurehead for a backstage "team of Presidents", with Biden just wheeled out with a mask on on special occasion's refusing to talk.
China said that "The US can no longer ‘speak to China from a position of strength’".. It certainly looks that way when the country is led by an OAP who cannot even walk up a flight of stairs to Air Force one without tripping up multiple times. This was something he blasted Trump for doing, saying back when Trump was President, "Watch how I run up ramps and he stumbles down ramps."
Who really is in charge of the US establishment? Biden and the pretend two party Pro wresting like squad of politicians pretending to listen to the public, all whilst taking their orders from Wall St and the MIC?. They were so scared of letting a social democrat such as Bernie Sanders from getting near the White House that they smeared and lambasted him as a socialist on the mainstream TV. before he succumbed and left the race, as well as thousands of supporters who believed in him, all left disappointed. Knowing that once again the DNC had fixed the race to let another establishment figure take the nomination.
Even top Democrats wondered seriously, debating which would be worst, another Trump Presidency or Bernie having 4 years to at least try and modernise America to the level of most Social Democratic countries. Modern countries not as rich as the USA that blunt the hard edges of capitalism with social benefits, free health care, housing and education for those Capitalism throws to the curb. The American dream is more of a "born into the 1%", than work hard and make your way up the ladder to join the rich, playing golf, and hanging out with sex traffickers. .
In any other country Bernie would be considered a normal social democrat, nothing strange about his ideas or policy ideas. However in the US, people think that he is almost a communist for calling for reasonable policies most countries have such as free health care for all, and a decent increasing, minimum wage. Bernie tweeted out this only days ago. If you have time read the re-actions he got to feel the ire of his followers.
What will the $1,400 direct payments in the American Rescue Plan mean for you and your family?
He actually seems to have been brought back into the main Republican fold. I say that because Democrats are basically now Republicans since Bill Clinton. The GOP has been pushed so much to the right wing they seem like fanatics to many people.
What would a one off payment of $1,400 make to you?
Not much I reckon to most people now without jobs or job tied in heath care. Medicare for everyone in a pandemic would have been the best first move Biden and the Democrats could have made when they got in power, controlling both houses, and the Presidency. It would have been a win win for everybody. Making the citizens actually believe the politicians cared about them, and allowing the Government to brush off their backs the leeching lobbyists from big pharma..
Instead as they squabbled for weeks over whether to hand out $2,000 as promised, or $1,400, one of payments. All as people waited, broke and being kicked out their homes. Instead he launched missile attacks in Syria and sent more troops to the Middle East. Does that sound like he is more interested in looking after the US citizens or the chairman of the MIC companies who pull his strings?
If you could afford it I like many others would recommend investing in Bitcoin, the Central Banks may not like BTC. But as they print more and more money, de-valuing the dollar, to pay to billionaires who are more likely to stash it in off shore accounts than spend it, it is a crypto currency on the rise.
Forget the stock market, we have already seen that the game, quite literally is rigged. So why not invest in BTC a "Fuck You currency", Keiser said. Unless they destroy everyone in the world's computers then they cannot stop it's use. Especially as more and more mainstream stores and businesses accept payment with it.
Whilst most countries have been paying unemployed workers benefits or a percentage of their salary until they can get back to work. Americans have to deal without healthcare in the middle of a pandemic. Also it seems from recent Tweets they and are expected to clap loudly at temporary measures and measly one off payments that are supposed to help them as they are locked up without a job and no money coming in.
Biden who won't speak publicly, possibly due to the establishment being so scared of what mistakes he might make or meanderings into the past he may drift into by accident, he is definitely being coddled by his staff.
As Bloomberg says "Formal news briefings don’t have the impact they once did, but they do signal a president’s respect for keeping the public informed". This is something previous Presidents have done ASAP after their elections to the White House in previous terms.
Here is Biden's latest official Tweet. Do you think he actually knew how to use the computer or phone to make it, as Trump did. Or were his staff so scared of what he may say, a junior staffer, one who hasn't been fired for smoking weed in their youth, tweeted it out instead. How hypocritical considering most States have legalised it for either recreational or medical use and especially as his own son Hunter Biden has major drug problems himself.
Most of those cages were created under Obama, another let down for those who actually believed he would help them, and then Trump was blasted for keeping them. Why is most of the MSM staying silent over Biden's handling of the border crisis now?
Anyway, rant over. These are the 3 video's I saw on YouTube today. They are all different but all have a story to tell about Biden's Presidency.
Let me know if you are from America, or even if you are not, what you think of Biden's first month's in the White House?
This article has been taken from the BBC Website and I am reproducing it here, as it was from my old site and the article was not copied across when I moved here. So I used the Wayback Machine to get a copy. I did this in case the original ever disappears so that there is record of an “official” news establishment admitting that such an all invasive privacy destroying system exists and has done so for quite a while.
By Andrew Bomford of BBC Radio 4′s PM programme
Imagine a global spying network that can eavesdrop on every single phone call, fax or e-mail, anywhere on the planet.
It sounds like science fiction, but it’s true.
Two of the chief protagonists – Britain and America – officially deny its existence. But the BBC has confirmation from the Australian Government that such a network really does exist and politicians on both sides of the Atlantic are calling for an inquiry.
On the North Yorkshire moors above Harrogate they can be seen for miles, but still they are shrouded in secrecy. Around 30 giant golf balls, known as radomes, rise from the US military base at Menwith Hill.
Linked to the NSA
Inside is the world’s most sophisticated eavesdropping technology, capable of listening-in to satellites high above the earth.
The base is linked directly to the headquarters of the US National Security Agency (NSA) at Fort Mead in Maryland, and it is also linked to a series of other listening posts scattered across the world, like Britain’s own GCHQ.
The power of the network, codenamed Echelon, is astounding.
Every international telephone call, fax, e-mail, or radio transmission can be listened to by powerful computers capable of voice recognition. They home in on a long list of key words, or patterns of messages. They are looking for evidence of international crime, like terrorism.
Open Oz
The network is so secret that the British and American Governments refuse to admit that Echelon even exists. But another ally, Australia, has decided not to be so coy.
The man who oversees Australia’s security services, Inspector General of Intelligence and Security Bill Blick, has confirmed to the BBC that their Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) does form part of the network.
“As you would expect there are a large amount of radio communications floating around in the atmosphere, and agencies such as DSD collect those communications in the interests of their national security”, he said.
Asked if they are then passed on to countries like Britain and America, he said: “They might be in certain circumstances.”
But the system is so widespread all sorts of private communications, often of a sensitive commercial nature, are hoovered up and analysed.
Journalist Duncan Campbell has spent much of his life investigating Echelon. In a report commissioned by the European Parliament he produced evidence that the NSA snooped on phone calls from a French firm bidding for a contract in Brazil. They passed the information on to an American competitor, which won the contract.
“There’s no safeguards, no remedies, ” he said, “There’s nowhere you can go to say that they’ve been snooping on your international communications. Its a totally lawless world.”
Breaking the silence
Both Britain and America deny allegations like this, though they refuse to comment further. But one former US army intelligence officer has broken the code of silence.
Colonel Dan Smith told the BBC that while this is feasible, it is not official policy:
“Technically they can scoop all this information up, sort through it, and find what it is that might be asked for,” he said. “But there is no policy to do this specifically in response to a particular company’s interests.”
Legislators on both sides of the Atlantic are beginning to sit up and take notice. Republican Congressman Bob Barr has persuaded congress to open hearings into these and other allegations.
In December he is coming to Britain to raise awareness of the issue. In an interview with the BBC he accused the NSA of conducting a broad “dragnet” of communications, and “invading the privacy of American citizens.”
He is joined in his concerns by a small number of politicians In Britain. Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker has tabled a series of questions about Menwith Hill, but has been met with a wall of silence.
“There’s no doubt it’s being used as a listening centre,” he said, “There’s no doubt it’s being used for US interests, and I’m not convinced that Britain’s interests are being best served by this.”
The original article on the BBC news site has actually been removed but you can still find a copy on the Wayback Machine Archive. I wouldn't be surprised if that site is removed soon due to "Cancel Culture", when people want all their Internet History "Scrubbed" from the web this is one site that they ask to have archived content remove from.
Money Rules Everything - Have A Different Perspective
By Dark Politricks
As the world goes crazy, and we hear about the rich DAVOS crowd, telling us to stay indoors, work from home, don't drive or go on holiday, and now, all to save the environment. We should all be thinking about why they are really telling us this and continuing to extend the lockdowns.
This Orwellian state is something they have used COVID19 as a cover for getting us ready and compliant for ages. It all comes down to money, the money of the rich and the tiny percentage left for the rest of the world. Whatever the Global Reset's fluffy words try to cover, there will be no rebalancing of capital from those who currently have it and those who don't.
Normal people may end up worse off for those in Africa to gain a little, but you won't see Bill Gates becoming an average Middle Class income spender, or Jeff Bezos giving away his billions to end hunger in the 3rd world.
When you think about it, it is pretty sick to hear these billionaires who could easily put their money together, combined enough to end world poverty, and probably give decent free health care to the unfortunate places who don't yet have it, such as some poor African countries or the USA..
Therefore I thought I would share this poem I saw about money from the famous British poet Benjamin Zephaniah. It's worth a listen, especially in these times.
People all over Europe and the world are starting to see through the ruse, and unwilling to be test subjects for long vaccine trials.
You can see from this Tweet how people in Germany are fighting back against the Police State that has been built up around us during our lockdown.
Now they are saying we should continue the lockdown for Climate Change. This was the main reason for all this, and now it is coming clear to many, when the super rich start telling us to stay home. All whilst they fly around on private jets, deciding undemocratically, what is in our best interests.
Using the stick of Climate Change as a threat, and the carrot of a UBI, they warn that Climate Change is going to bring about more pandemics and therefore lockdowns if the governments of the world treat them as they have done with COVID19.
Meet the Press host Chuck Todd during an interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci floated the idea that “it is inevitable” the world will face more viruses “due to climate change.”
“When you think about sadly having to prepare for this again, and I know there's a lot of folks who think that, due to climate change and due to the globalization in general, it is inevitable that we’ll deal with more and more viruses like this. The biggest lesson you are going to take away to prepare for the next one,” Todd said during an interview Sunday morning.
In the USA, the people were told in March to lock down for 15 days to “flatten the curve”. Bill Gates (who is not a doctor and was not elected or appointed by any government) later said that the world cannot go fully back to normal until most people get his rushed RNA vaccine.
That was a year ago. Most people around the world are still living under some sort of emergency powers due to the pandemic that seems like a Police State to any normal thinking person. The laws enacted that enabled Police to arrest, jail or fine you for walking your dog, or leaving your local area are just what globalists have wanted enacting for years.
Just read up on UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 for some info on what the rulers of this world have wanted to do to us for a very long time, and COVID has been used as an excuse to implement these measures faster than expected.
It has given them an opportunity to enact laws and measures to restrict our travel, businesses, and health by using COVID as the excuse, but with Climate Change being the real reason for these measures.
For those who do not yet understand, there is no end to this. The bureaucrats, elitists and “experts” flexing their enforcement muscles do not view this as a temporary exercise. In their minds we would have all been better off long ago if we had simply accepted the fact that they knew better how we should live our lives.
They have nibbled around the edges of that concept for many years. COVID-19 has now provided them the opportunity to exert control over literally every aspect of what we used to call personal freedom, we are basically all living in some form of an Orwellian 1984 Police State at the moment.
The virus is just the excuse for the lockdown. Many scientists have come out to say this including 7,000 scientists who have told the British Government that lockdowns are not required anymore. Of course this has been rejected by Boris Johnson and his Tory cabinet.
The Independent reports: The Great Barrington Declaration, which has been signed by more than 7,000 scientists and medics worldwide, calls for a new strategy of allowing younger people to go about their lives as normal while offering “focused protection” to the elderly and those with underlying medical conditions who are most at risk from coronavirus.
Downing Street has rejected the call of the Great Barrington group of scientists for an end to lockdown measures, saying their argument rests on an “unproven assumption” that it would be possible to protect the most vulnerable.
It goes on to say:
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed
It has won the support of UK scientists including Professor Karol Sikora, and Tory backbencher Steve Baker has urged MPs to offer it their backing, in a direct challenge to the government’s strategy. You can read the whole declaration here: The Great Barrington Declaration.
Yet despite Scientists and civilians fighting lockdown measures already, we are hearing rumblings from those who want to use lockdowns to combat climate change.
The basis for this suggestion is simple, and terrifying in its implications. COVID-19 measures have been justified legally by the proposition that the disease constitutes a public health crisis.
If those in power simply labelled “climate change” as a public health crisis then we they would be free to employ equally draconian measures in response and to continue them, in perpetuity, to ensure that this “threat” was vanquished.
Under a “climate lockdown,” governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.
So as we are imprisoned in our own homes, and thousands of scientists warn of the dangers to our health, as well as our economies, the powers that be ignore them and allow a small percentage of people to get increasingly rich due to the COVID lockdown, and let them tell us as if they are informed and reliable sources, that we should keep these measures to help out with Climate Change, all as they get increasingly richer of course.
Why should we listen to the same people who have made billions off this COVID lockdown who fly about in their private jets, like Bill Gates, when they tell us we need to not travel or drive ourselves, and maybe even be locked down regularly for the sake of Climate Change.
The 1% have made billions from COVID, the leader being Jeff Bezos who made over $90bn during the crisis, followed by Elon Musk who made $68.2bn and of course Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg who made a measly $46.5 billion in comparison. Bill Gates himself made only $20bn. but then he is helping the world by rolling out the vaccine and ensuring it reaches all corners of the globe.
So why are we listening to the same people who have made billions off this crisis as they suggest solutions to problems we may not even be facing, all whilst getting extremely rich from the consequences to society?
I just hope if the state continues their crackdown on liberty as shown in the Tweet above when people try to peacefully protest and are met with violence by the authorities, that more of us are willing to stand up for ourselves like the brave men in the video shown above.
It may literally come down to a fight to save our freedoms or live in permanent police state all on the say so of billionaires and despite scientists saying their is no reason for such measures in the first place.
Who should the government be listening to, the people or the 1%. I guess they are controlled, funded and ordered around by those DAVOS billionaires who fund their political campaigns. However all throughout this lockdown they have frequently been telling us that they are following the science throughout this pandemic and the self imprisonment is required for our own sake.
If so, why are they not listening to the scientists right now?