The UK Social Credit Score System Is Here....

Social Credit Score System Comes To UK 

By Dark Politricks 

It's my 1st article of 2022, and it's a sad state of affairs we find ourselves in, when lockdown measures are being contemplated to attack a mutation of the virus with the same symptoms as a common cold.

Already the year has started off with school children having to wear masks in lessons despite scientists warning of the effect it would have on their mental health. I doubt a young kid will be fiddling with it too much and spreading germs from their faces and masks onto nearby surroundings.

For the rest of us it is back to no holiday's, limits on travel, mandates on vaccines despite the knowledge that the more vaccine shots we have the weaker they get. 

The 3rd booster shot is thought to only last 3 months and Israel is already on their 4th round of shots, despite medical professionals' doubts on whether it will do any good as shown by this professors logic:

"There is no evidence that a fourth dose helps. And there is no evidence that it does not harm," said Professor Ron Dagan, a paediatrician and infectious disease expert who is a member of the vaccine advisory panel and voted in favour of the recommendation. 

So no evidence that a 4th shot will help people and no evidence that it won't harm people instead, but despite that they are pushing forward to stop the spread of what many people are calling the OmicronCold due to the symptoms between a common cold and this variant being indistinguable. In fact they have said that if you have cold symptoms the likelihood that you have Omicron is 1 in 2.

So as Governments don't have time to waste, and instead of thinking about other ways we can live alongside this man made virus rather than trying to hide from it with each new variant, they are turning to the only tool they have in their box. The vaccines. However if 3 shots of the vaccine won't prevent you catching, spreading and maybe killing you. I don't see the logic in thinking 4 shots will.

There are even claims by medical professionals that the vaccines are not even real. Spanish medical researchers in two separate studies have analysed the contents of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine vials and found a toxic blood-clotting substance or poison that may be responsible for adverse effects and deaths in recipients. The toxic substance graphene oxide was found in the Pfizer vials by Spanish researchers has now been confirmed to also be the main ingredient in the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Dr. Delgado states that the nanographene oxide creates thrombogenicity or blood-clotting in the veins, compromises the immune system, causes bilateral pneumonia, causes loss of smell and taste, causes multi-organ inflammation and essentially creates all the symptoms attributed early in the pandemic rollout to COVID-19. The researchers note that graphene oxide has been used before in small quantities as an adjuvant in vaccines, and may be found at low levels in flu shots.

These findings add to the alarm bells being rung by health professionals around the world over the alleged dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines, including the problems allegedly associated with the experimental mRNA contents in the vaccines. So I can hardly see why politicians think having even more "booster" shots of the already known to be leaky, and now possibly dangerously made, vaccines will help anyone but the companies and investors making money from pushing the idea.

It won't be long until other countries succumb to the wisdom of Big Pharma shills and force their populations into getting more shots that even mainstream scientists are now warning won't help stop the spread. We already know how leaky these vaccines are, as a true vaccine would stop us getting the virus, spreading it, and dying from it. All the current vaccines apart from Cuba's, is based on new mRNA technology that does none of these things.

I can only think our governments have been totally captured by Big Pharma. It is either that or that politicians like Nancy Pelosi, who sees nothing wrong with policy makers investing in the stock market to profit from their policies, having huge investments in these pharmaceutical companies. Therefore the more they push people to have boosters the more money they make. Simple modern day Capitalist Insider Trading Politics at work. 

However what is more concerning is that this pandemic has been used by Western Governments to bring in authoriatarian policies that have and will have major effects on our civil liberties. As well as all the new powers the Police and Government have which were supposedly brought in to "fight the virus" and then be removed, They are now extending the power of the state from Australia to Europe and America. On top of these new diktats, comes the long anticipated Chinese style social credit system. In the UK they already have plans to use the cover of COVID to roll out such a social credit based system,

Most Western nations have been eyeing up the Chinese control system enviously over the years, and I would not be surprised to find out some Western Tech companies were even helping to fund or help the Chinese code and implement it. The only problem we "democratic" nations had, was an excuse to implement such an idea, and with the pandemic they have found just the right reason.

Just as the Chinese "Great Firewall", was copied by Australia, and more despotic nations, to stop their citizens from accessing certain web content they they deem unacceptable, we in the UK are now going to implement China's most unacceptable means of social control.

It seems we have been using China as a test bed for all sorts of authoritarian acts from the days of Mao, when David Rockefeller commented on how much he admired the Chinese system that killed up to 80 million people in their "reforms" that were harshly implemented on the people.

It seems not a lot has changed, as we have billionaires doing the same thing today. Wealthy billionaire Charlie Munger is a huge fan of how communist China manages its economy and Bill Gates along with many others in the 0.1%, have even been admitted into Communist China's Academy of Engineering (CAE).

This might seem an odd fit for uber-capitalist Bill Gates, since the CAE is the People’s Republic of China’s elite society of technology professionals who have proven their service to the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Communist State. But like many other super-wealthy westerners, Gates has shown himself sympathetic to authoritarian and totalitarian regimes.

Together with David Rockefeller, George Soros, Ted Turner, Warren Buffet, and a small clutch of additional billionaires, Gates formed a cabal they dubbed “The Good Club,” which seems to be fixated on population control. Its members are seemingly very comfortable with China’s coercive (and murderous) One Child policy as an answer to population “problems.” However, I wonder what the "Good Club" thought of the death rooms, where all the second and third children were left to die?

Chinese state media also declared Gates a hero, after he defended the moves China made early on to stop the spread of the virus. Moves like bolting metal bars across peoples front doors of people's flats that contained virus infected people maybe? 

We have all seen the videos of how China "dealt" with the virus in Wuhan and all the soldiers/doctors walking the roads with automatic rifles. 

It would be really interesting to find out, if ever possible, to know how many people in Wuhan didn't die from the actual virus, but from the Chinese authorities attempts to stop it's spread, by strict measures such as locking people in their homes to starve to death.

Bill Gates not only argued that it is not time to be questioning the Chinese Communist Party’s (CPC) efforts in handling the COVID-19 outbreak, but went so far as to dispel any wrongdoing by the communist regime. 

Even as these videos of people being locked inside to starve, and soldiers dressed as doctors patrolled the streets with guns were being leaked out of Wuhan, Bill didn't seem to mind, even saying that “China did a lot of things right at the beginning, like any country where a virus first shows up".

However just like most greedy men, he ignores the mass killings, and imprisoned Muslim population in China, as he is captured by all the opportunities that lie there to make more money. I wonder if there is even a limit in these billionaire's heads of when is enough money really enough.

However back to the Social Credit Score system coming to the UK. You should already know that the UK Government has used the excuse of COVID to mould the population into little compliant people that are scared of holding a door, and disinfect everything so much they can no longer fight off a common cold. 

The UK government COVID law was only supposed to sit on our statute books for 2 years but has already been extended, and will probably stay on the statute books forever. Just like the post 9.11 laws in the US have, which should have been repealed many years ago. 

The Tory government has brought in laws that will stop people even protesting against any future laws that are aimed at making us all compliant little workers with no social interaction. These COVID laws are the biggest loss of civil liberties since the 2nd World War, will we ever see the end of them? I doubt it, but will be amazed if we did.

Even just posting a blog article or a citizens journalist post like I do on the over-reach of the UK Government will soon be illegal as they are rolling out strict laws that mean even criticising the UK when they break international law, or commit war crimes, will soon be illegal to report on. It will basically mean anyone in the UK thinking of following Julian Assange and Wikileaks, won't have any excuse or mitigating circumstances when brought in front of a judge.

The UK has already been found to be hypocrites paying thousands of bloggers and YouTube influencers to promote pro NATO propaganda into Russia, whilst at the same time complaining of Russia doing the exact same sort of interference. The only difference is that we in the west believe that when we are doing it, we are doing it for the good of the world and cannot even see the hypocrisy in our double standards and red lines.

It's as laughable as the US government accusing Russia of interfering in their elections when their own history of interfering in other countries elections is appalling, The US government through NGO's and the CIA have been overthrowing democratic left leaning governments and instigating coups for as long as they could. The world is littered with countries that currently have, or did have right wing dictators, that were installed by the USA. It is a long list of hypocrisy, and not even Joe Biden, who has probably been involved in some of these acts doesn't seem to realise this, in this speech he makes here.

The American friendly leaders who the CIA install when the economic hit men cannot, all privatise their natural wealth to make US businesses even richer, and the US helps out by training their soldiers/death squads in the infamous "school of America's" (Fort Benning U.S. Army base in Georgia). 

So our Western hypocrisy when claiming foreign states don't have freedom of speech, or allow journalists to speak out, is easily reflected back on us by any foreign despot being interviewed who knows a bit of history. They don't even have to look that far back as recent events have shown, when interviewed, leaders of countries with poor human rights only need to mention our current crime of slowly killing Julian Assange for telling the truth, to shine that mirror back in our faces.

However for the UK to be turning their Track n Trace apps into more than just a "helpful" tool to tell people that they have been near someone with COVID, into a version of the Chinese Social Credit system is appalling. 

Here is a tweet I posted the other day about it....

Oh the irony and the disappointment. I wrote articles years back about this happening in the UK and #CovidTesting #lockdowns hv just been a testing ground 4 socially conditioning the population n seeing how compliant we r to the Government. We may need another peasants revolt! https://t.co/le6dILCnMU

— Dark Politricks RT (@darkpoltweeter) December 29, 2021

You can go to the UK Governments page on the bill titled "Identity document validation technology in the right to work and right to rent schemes, and DBS pre-employment checking" right here.

However the main points you should note are; not only will the system like the track n trace smart phone app, that the UK government has used to tell YOU about being in contact with someone with COVID, in future it will also tell employers and Government officials, personal data about you including.

1. Physical Health conditions.
2. Mental Health conditions.
3. Circumstances related to the individuals lifestyle.
4. Circumstances related to the individuals social circumstances.
5. Information related to the individuals genetic and biometric details.
6. Criminal Convictions or "alleged" criminal behaviour.

Now if that doesn't sound like government overreach then I can only guess you are the sort of person who bends over when asked without question for a good seeing to by any stranger in the street. 

No offence but if the thought of someone "alleging" that you are involved in a criminal act, despite any proof, being held on a system against your name, that potential employers, housing associations, councils and the Government and Police can use to harass and mistreat you, prevent you getting jobs or housing doesn't shock or appal you then you need your head seeing to. 

If you really don't think any of this is a big deal you should go back and read an article and watch a great video I posted a couple of years ago in January 2020. 

It was here, that I warned you, that the Chinese style social credit system would be coming to a country near you very soon. I didn't think it would be this soon, but then I didn't expect most of our country to just compliantly accept all the new rules and laws that our Government forced on us, many which they broke themselves, due to an outbreak of a man made virus.

Now a lot of this tech relies on you having a smart phone, a modern day spy in your pocket that uploads where you have been, who you have been near, places you have visited on the Internet and much much more. 

However what if we don't put these Track n Trace apps on our phones, or don't even own one? 

I actually emailed the government asking what am I supposed to do without a smart phone to hold these track and trace applications, that are being extended into social credit score apps, and they replied with the following...

Nick (C19 Testing) 1 Jan 2022, 13:04 GMT Hi xxx,

Happy new year.

It's still possible without a smart phone but you'll need a digital camera and a laptop / computer that can use the picture you take and be uploaded to the website.

Alternatively, if you have a friend or neighbour that can help you with the process i.e. they register on your behalf and take the picture once you've tested.

Kind regards,

Nick

So I guess all the poor must go and purchase digital cameras and laptops to upload their photo ID to the website or find someone to do it for them. I think the most sensible idea is just to never install anything on your phone the government says you have to. 

It is lucky I still own some burners from the 90s, which have no GPS tracking, and I can easily take the battery and SIM card out if needed. Maybe people need to forget about all the social media sites that steal our data and sell it on to advertisers, or scan our phones and networks for incriminating photos and information such as the new Instagram terms of service seem to suggest the ability and right to so if you use their app. 

Maybe we need to roll back our reliance on Smart Phones, re-connect with people physically not over an app, and revert back to "dumb phones" that just let us ring people and text. You can watch some satire about Instagram's new Terms of Service below.

Anything modern and you are just a moving dot on a huge computer screen that can be targeted by government requests to photograph yourself and send it back. Just like the Australian government, that are requiring their pissed off population to do. All so they can see how far away from their house they were at the time of the photo, and fine them if they had no good reason to be so.

You can read more about Australia's dive into despotism on an earlier article I wrote here. They are literally holding people who are found to have been "near" people who turn out COVID positive through Smart Phone apps, despite the person themselves not being infected, in concentration camps that are being built all over the country.

However it is not only dangerous to talk about the merits and evils of the current establishments handling of this pandemic but wee must also be careful when using social media to spread actual FACTS, such as that over 400,000 people in the USA have had adverse reactions from the vaccine shots as I have had here in the UK. 

I don't know world figures, but it must be over a million, and I bet Big Pharma are thankful for their "Get out of Jail and not be sued, card" they got for massive quick production of these leaky vaccines in which people need 3 shots a year, and can still contract, pass on and even die from the virus the vaccine is supposed to prevent. 

Even the inventor of the RNA vaccines many Big Pharma companies are using, Robert Malone, has been kicked off Twitter, for talking about adverse effects from the vaccines. 

Despite being involved with the development of mRNA technology decades ago, Dr Malone has become an outspoken critic of mass vaccination. Both the Pfizer and the Moderna jabs are built on mRNA technology, which uses genetic engineering to tell our bodies to manufacture the spike protein found in Covid-19 and create antibodies that kick in if you become infected. 

But Dr Malone believes there is not enough adequate testing in place to warrant mass vaccination, especially in children. "No parent should kick their children without first seeing the warnings of Robert W. Malone." he tweeted before his Twitter account was suspended because he had been warning of dangerous adverse effects for months. 

I bet Big Pharma is glad they have Big Tech in their pockets as well as the governments of the world. It is plainly a bold faced lie to say no adverse effects come from the vaccine and anyone claiming otherwise is lying their face off. 

When I try to find out the no of people in the UK who have had adverse effects from the vaccine, I get sent to this government URL, and at the bottom is says "Unfortunately, we do not hold information on adverse vaccine reactions or hospitalisations.", how very convenient for them. 

However I found this link from the UK state media outfit the BBC that says "About one in three people recently given a Covid vaccine by the NHS report some side-effects.", however they then add "none were serious". 

However this article seems to offer different evidence from VAERS data released by the American CDC that showed a total of 441,931 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines. This included 6,985 deaths and 34,065 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and June 25, 2021.

However if you think all this is just perfectly okay with you, along with all the other despotic things the UK government has implemented during the 2 years of COVID lockdowns. Some which even the World Health Organisation, and 900,000 doctors and scientists, said were not necessary in the Great Barringtion Declaration, then please have a read of these articles. 

Have I just been shouting in the wind with no-one listening, or is just a coincidence that these "conspiracy theories" are all coming true.

1. Get ready for your 4th vaccine shot.
2. Alarm grows as medical researchers find dangerous substances in the vaccines.
3. Australia is a despot regime. 
4. Spies in our pocket - Track n Trace apps and Google doing evil.
5. It must be just a coincidence we are looking more like China every day.
6. Why are people leaving Facebook, Google and YouTube for alternative sites that respect free speech.
7. 900,000 Scientists and Doctors say that the lockdown measures our Governments have used to make us comply with their move into despotism were unneeded.
8. The Chinese Social Credit System coming to the UK and a country near you soon.
9. The UK is turning more despotic by the day. 
10. The UK is turning into a police state.
11. The UK Government article listing out the new social credit system of control.

Now can someone tell me why they would actually want to install one of these "track n trace" apps, that are being extended into social credit passports, onto your phone? 

By Dark Politricks 

© 2022 Dark Politricks

9.11 sceptics versus logic, reason and scientific principles

By Dark Politricks

Despite directly contacting 9.11 sceptics and debunker websites and asking very very nicely I still haven't managed to find anyone willing or knowledgeable enough to debate the evidence regarding 9/11 and the official conspiracy theory. The very few people I do find often don't even know the official story well enough let alone all the various contentious topics surrounding the events of 9.11. Therefore I decided to conduct a little one on one imaginary discussion in the manner I would tackle a debate on the topic if required.

Why would our government do such a thing. Surely you're not expecting me to believe that George Bush master minded an attack on his own people just to start a war. The expense both in monetary terms, lives and the reputation of the USA has been severely damaged by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. What possible reason exists to commit such a crime.

Yes the wars have been expensive and I am not alleging George Bush was involved at any level as he can barely master his own mind let alone a coordinated attack on the level of 9.11. However that is not to say other members in the US government and / or intelligence community did not know the attacks were about to happen and allowed them for various reasons. Without a full independent investigation we will not know the exact reasons and people involved.

Conspiracy theories are the playground of loons and mentalists with too much time on their hands. We know what happened on 9.11 and the only conspiracy was the one that involved 19 Al Qaeda hijackers who brought carnage to the USA.

You are right in that the events of 9.11 involved a conspiracy but there is a large body of evidence that suggests the 19 hijackers were not the only players involved. The official story is also a coincidence theory in that a number of amazing events all occurred on the same day. Events which the probability of them all happening together would have been extraordinarily high but which we are expected to accept as happening by pure chance rather than from a concerted planned effort. For example:

• 4 planes were successfully hijacked at the same time by a few men on each plane armed only with rudimentary weapons.
• Not one of these successful hijacked planes was met with a challenge from the US air force which was the standard practise.
• Not one camera in the most monitored and controlled part of airspace in the US managed to catch the incoming flight 77 as it hit the Pentagon.
• The biggest coincidence is that 3 tall steel framed skysrapers, all owned by the same person, collapsed into their own footprint after short fires. Never before had a building like this collapse from fire alone and although two buildings were hit by planes the building structures were designed to withstand such impacts and the other building wasn't hit by a plane at all. To have one building collapse looking exactly like a controlled demolition is unlucky, to have two is careless but three is downright freaky. What are the chances that a mile and a half of combined buildings would all collapse at almost freefall speed in the manner expected from controlled collapses but not be caused by explosives at all.

This is not to say that all these coincidences couldn't have occurred just that before 9.11 the most sophisticated coordinated Al Qaeda attack had been the embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya which involved a couple of truck bombs. Therefore the jump in the level of complexity between the usual modus operandi and the attacks of 9.11 was immense.

Just because the attacks were sophisticated it doesn't not mean that either Al Qaeda didn't or couldn't carry them out. Suggesting that our government was complicit some-way in these attacks is not only unpatriotic but unproven plus we know Al Qaeda did it as Bin Laden admitted it.

A few points here. Although the CIA and other war mongers have done a good PR job Al Qaeda is not and never has been a Spectre or Smersh like organisation intent on world domination with agents hiding under every bush. Bin Laden was an ex CIA asset who was utilised during the Afghanistan war against the Soviets and according to the most gagged woman in history, Sibel Edmonds, the USA maintained close links with him up until 9.11. As Robin Cook, the ex UK minister wrote in the Guardian, Al Qaeda actually means "the database" and refers to a file of CIA recruited and trained fighters who helped repel the Red army.

As for admitting involvement in the attacks we only have a dodgy video tape and a very unconvincing translation that takes the conversation out of context for these claims. We know that subsequent Bin Laden tapes have been faked and many people believe Bin Laden died in late 2001. Whether you believe he is dead or not we do have one interview that was conducted with him just after the attacks in which he categorically denies any involvement.

As for proving whether the US government, Israel or any other state actors played a part in the attacks we shouldn't rule that out just because a neat trail of evidence was laid to the door of Bin Laden's cave in Tora Bora. We all know that every country engages in black ops and covert operations and a cursory knowledge of history proves that politicians, the military, intelligence agencies and other influential people are perfectly capable and willing to not only exploit events on the magnitude of 9.11 for their own benefit but actually help cause attacks of this nature either directly or indirectly for political gain. For a start we should ask ourselves the following:

1. Did certain people in the US establishment want to increase American influence and control in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Yes. It is well known that a large number of neo-conservatives wanted to assert US dominance over the Middle East and Afghanistan for a number of reasons including:

• Control of the main source of Oil and other natural resources.
• A buffer to emerging powers of China and a re-assertive Russia.
• To aid their ally Israel in helping combat their enemies in that region.

You can read all about their desire for such a scenario in the infamous Project for a New American Century reports. This is the same document that asserted that such a plan would be impossible to implement without a major "New Pearl Harbour" event taking place. It can be argued that 9.11 was exactly this event as these plans were then implemented. The question is was this purely co-incidental or linked somehow.

2. Were those people in government.

Yes the co-authors and supporters of the now controversial report entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century were none other than Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld.

3. Were there existing plans to invade Afghanistan and Iraq before the attacks of 9.11 took place.

Yes not only were there plans to invade Afghanistan and remove the Taliban that were talked about in July 2001 to be implemented before Christmas of 2001, but no sooner had George Bush taken residency in the White House plans were set in motion to topple Saddam Hussein and manage the rich oil fields that would fall under their control after any successful invasion.

So not only did certain powerful people talk and write about their desire to expand US power into the Middle East and Central Asia they also realised that these plans would be hard to achieve unless a major attack on the country took place. The fact that such an attack did take place and the exact desired plans were enacted is either a brilliant piece of luck on these war mongers behalf or lady luck was given a helping hand to bring that fateful event about.

Okay so some people may have wanted to expand US power abroad but that doesn't mean they staged 9.11. It's one thing to use a horrific event as an excuse to carry out plans that wouldn't otherwise have been enacted but quite another to cause the act to happen in the first place. Conspiracy theorists always think the worst of people, our government would never be involved in carrying out such a crime against the people.

You obviously are not aware of recent history which unfortunately is littered with cases of supposedly democratic nations engaging in crimes against it's own people for political expediency. The USA went to war in Vietnam over an event which has now been admitted never happened, the Gulf of Tonkin incident and de-classified documents show that the US military was not afraid of discussing the use of false flag attacks. It is also widely believed that Winston Churchill allowed the US passenger ship the Lusitania to be attacked and sunk by German U-Boats to bring the USA into World War 1. Also if you want an example of a conspiracy between nations to start a war you need only look at the Suez crisis in which the UK, France and Israel colluded together to wage war against Egypt so that they could wrestle control of the Suez canal back from Nasser.

More recent examples are not hard to find either and history is littered with many examples of nations engaging in under hand state crimes against it's own people including:

• Operation Gladio in which the Italian governments agents staged bombings, assassinations and assaults on it's citizens to be blamed on the far left.
• The Russian FSB apartment bombings in which nearly 300 people were killed in attacks blamed on Cheychen seperatists. Russian agents were filmed planting explosives in an apartment block but when questioned on the matter they claimed it was just a test to see how aware the citizens were.
• The Lavon affair in which Israeli agents staged a number of false flag attacks in Egypt by blowing up US and British targets including a library and a theatre in the hope of the attacks being blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood.

Unfortunately these are just three proven incidents out of many however the one thing they all have in common is the misuse of intelligence agencies. A False Flag attack is undeniably a commonly used tool that is used to blacken ones enemies and invoke sympathy for otherwise unsavoury actions.

One of the main perfecters of the false flag attack which it has used many times to get American armed forces to do it's bidding is the Israeli Mossad. I have already mentioned the Lavon affair in which Americans were targeted by Israeli agents in an attempt to pin the blame on Muslims but other examples include:

Operation Trojan, in which a Mossad team planted a fake relay transmitter in Libyan territory and then broadcast messages containing coded orders to carry out terrorist attacks knowing that they would be picked up by US interceptors. The Americans fell for this plan and believed fake intel that pinned a German nightclub bombing which had killed a US solider on Libya. They re-acted by bombing the country and killed Gaddafi's adopted daughter.

The USS Liberty attack in which dozens of US servicemen were murdered in a daylight attack during the 1967 war. Although Israel and it's supporters claim this was an accident the survivors believe it was a deliberate attempt to bring the US into the war on Israels side by pinning the blame on Egypt. The evidence supports their claims including the testimony of an ex Israeli pilot who refused to attack the ship knowing it was American and workers from intercept stations that twice overheard Israeli pilots reporting that the ship was not Egyptian as was claimed but American.

Okay so intelligence agencies can get out of hand but surely our current crop of government officials are moral upstanding God believing civilised humans who would never consider such tactics.

LOL. You cannot be serious? Politicians are probably the least moral of all human kind and many politicians either enter politics for selfish notions such as power, money, ego or become corrupted along the way. This is not to say all politicians are corruptible just that it seems that way due to the many sex, drink and drugs, expenses and other scandals that plague their profession. However to give you specific examples of government officials discussing the use of false flag attacks:

Tony Blair and George Bush discussed flying a UN marked plane over Iraq in the hope it would get shot down and then be blamed on Saddam giving them an excuse to invade. This story has actually re-surfaced in a recent memoir by General Hugh Shelton in which he states that at a meeting:

"A high-ranking cabinet member suggests intentionally flying an American airplane on a low pass over Baghdad so as to guarantee it will be shot down, thus creating a natural excuse to retaliate and go to war."

Dick Cheney discussed staging a false flag attack in the Straight of Hormuz by painting US boats so they looked like Republican Guard boats and then staging a shoot up with US ships which could be used as a pretext to starting a war.

We should also remember that we are dealing with the sorts of people who ran unofficial assassination squads and who sanctioned the use of torture on detainees at bases from Abu Girab to Gitmo. These are also people that knew that most of the detainees held at Guantanamo Bay were innocent.

Therefore we are dealing with people who have little moral fibre but who seem to believe that strong unethical action is needed to be taken sometimes to protect their country. However misguided these people are it is not inconceivable that someone honestly believed that by allowing the attacks of 9.11 to take place they were helping the USA by giving it a chance to "Sweep it all up. Things related and not" as Donald Rumsfeld famously said in the aftermath of the attacks.

Okay so false flag attacks do happen and western countries are not above carrying out dubious acts in the hope of blaming their enemies. However this does not mean that 9.11 was such an event. For one thing a conspiracy of this size and scale would involve far too many people for it to be kept quiet.

Not necessarily. There are many theories surrounding the events of 9.11 and only with a full independent investigation can we possibly ever know the truth however two of the most likely scenarios in my opinion are that either:

• The act was a terrorist operation that was allowed to happen due to someone at a high level within the US intelligence community either deliberately "ignoring" the multiple warnings and signs that an attack was going to happen.
• Or the event started off as a terrorist attack but was discovered by intelligence officers and then co-opted and managed by a team of intelligence officers to ensure that it went off successfully.

Unlike some of the more far fetched theories surrounding 9.11 such as the "no planes" theory which would have involved hundreds of people including many civilians in the media being in on the secreet both of these plans would only require a small number of people to be involved.

If the attack was allowed to happen on purpose at the minimum the conspiracy need only involve a few key decision makers either losing or not actioning reports that were coming in from foreign countries such as Saudi Arabia, France, Morocco and their own agents that the attacks were coming. By deliberately ignoring such intelligence it makes it easier to give the excuse that the attacks occurred due to negligence rather than any deliberate act to allow them to happen.

The co-opted terrorist attack or planned false flag would also only require a small dedicated team of intelligence officers and their handlers to be in the know. We should also note that members of intelligence agencies are sworn to keep official secrets acts and it is very unlikely that any serving member of a group involved in the attacks would blow the whistle especially if they believed they were doing it for the greater good. Like the JFK assassination we may have to wait until one of the conspirators is on their death beds before a confession is forth coming.

Hold up, did you just say someone confessed to the assassination of John F Kennedy on their death bed? Why didn't I hear about this on the news?

Yes a confession by an ex CIA agent E. Howard Hunt, who was involved in the Bay of Pigs and the Watergate scandal gave a confession on his death bed regarding his role in the assassination of JFK. The reason you didn't hear about it on the news is just one example of how the main stream media controls the flow of information regarding certain events. The same can be said for the 9.11 attacks in that:

• No sooner had the towers collapsed than Bin Laden was blamed for the attacks and the MSM were parroting the same line without any evidence or counter points viewed.
• The collapse of WTC-7 which was not hit by any plane and fell at near free-fall speed looking exactly like a controlled demolition was under reported and treated like a non event. Even today many people who still believe the official story have no idea that a third skyscraper collapsed in New York that day.
• Reports on the day that included interviews with first responders and survivors about secondary explosions, talk of such explosions by news reporters themselves along with footage containing the sounds of said explosions were never re-broadcasted once the "official" story was released.
• Any alternative view point regarding the events on the day are met with derision and cries of conspiracy theory or anti patriotic slurs. Hit pieces full of straw man arguments and selective evidence are constantly aired and the only place that much of the legitimate and very real evidence can be found is in the alternative media.

Okay so the Mainstream media doesn't report on wild conspiracy theories and prefers to only report stories backed up with provable facts. One thing is for sure and that is if members of the government or intelligence community deliberately failed to act on recieved intel that showed an attack was imminent then they would have been found out and punished.

You would think so wouldn't you however one of the strange provable facts regarding 9.11 is that the very people who failed in their responsibility to keep the country safe from terrorist attacks were not punished but rather rewarded through promotions.

In fact not one single person within those agencies that were supposed to be protecting the USA from attack was punished or sacked for failing to do their jobs properly. The following people who should have been reprimanded or sacked for failing to keep the country safe were all promoted:

• Richard Myers, in charge of the Pentagon on 9/11
• Ralph Eberhart, in charge of NORAD on 9/11
• Captain Charles J. Leidig, acting NMCC Director
• Brigadier General Montague Winfield
• Ben Sliney, in charge of FAA on 9/11
• Steven Abbot, coordinator of Dick Cheney’s task force on problems of national preparedness
• Michael Maltbie, the supervisor handling the case at the FBI's Radical Fundamentalist Unit
• Pasquale D’Amuro, in charge of counterterrorism in New York

and there are many more. In any world where blame was appropriated accordingly and people held account for failures which resulted in the deaths of 3,500+ people these high rankers would not have been promoted for their mistakes but punished. Logically there can only be a couple of reasons for this.

Either the USA rewards abject failure and incompetence and treats the biggest intelligence failure that ever occurred as a successful event rather than the murderous disaster it actually was or these people were paid off and rewarded for keeping their mouths shut or doing exactly what they were ordered to do on 9.11 e.g nothing.

Your making this out to be some kind of huge conspiracy but we know exactly what happened. An Al Qaeda terrorist cell hijacked multiple planes and flew them into multiple buildings. The 9.11 commission examined all the evidence and proved what happened.

Did it though?

6 out of the 10 commissioners have made comments regarding the failure of the commision to get to the truth of the events of that day due to a concerted cover up action by the White House.

"One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up". - Max Cleland who resigned from the 9.11 commission.

Not only did the White House delay creating the commission and then put limits on the scope of the investigation they also blocked the commission from reviewing documents and interviewing White House staff.

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a former Defense Intelligence Agency officer has recently gone on record to discuss how the commission refused to hear his evidence regarding the Able Danger program which was a data mining operation set up to identify links between terrorist suspects. By early 2000 this program had identified a Brooklyn terror cell that included Mohammed Atta as well as three other 9.11 hijackers.

The 9.11 commission was also used as the basis by the US government to build up it's case for war against Iraq. We all know the lies used to get us into that war and during the commission a prominent neo-con scholar called Laurie Mylroie repeated unfounded claims that Saddam Hussein had been behind every major terrorist attack against the United States since the early 90's including the first World Trade Center attack, the Oklahoma City bombing, the African embassy bombings and 9.11.

Also the 9.11 commission wasn't fully independent, had a narrow scope of reference and ignored key evidence that conflicted with the official story. In fact no proper criminal investigation was held into the events of 9.11 and it has been left to independent investigators, insurance companies and activists to truly investigate the events of that day.

So what actual evidence is there that conflicts with the official events of the day. From the documentaries I have seen on TV the collapse of the World Trade Center has been explained and NIST has finally released it's report into the collapse of WTC-7 which it proved was caused by fire.

The official story says that the collapse of all buildings on 9.11 was caused by the hijacked planes and resulting fires alone. If it can be proved that one of the buildings was in fact brought down by controlled demolition then this leaves the official story on rocky ground as it means all of the following:

• We have been lied to by our government and the owner of the building Larry Silverstein.
• The NIST report was in fact not an honest investigation but a cover up.
• Probability would suggest that we have been lied to about the cause of the collapse of the other buildings as well.
• The hijackers were not acting alone but were instead part of a grander conspiracy which involved agents who were able to access the WTC and plant explosives OR the explosives were planted quickly on 9.11. Either way if the building was brought down in a controlled fashion it has been covered up and investigation into the collapse has been managed to fit the official story.

Surely you can agree with these points and that if it is proven that one of the buildings fell due to a controlled demolition that logically this infers some high level of government collusion as even if a powerful terrorist group or foreign intelligence agency had been able to plant the explosives or bring down the buildings some other way they would find it very hard to control the conclusions of subsequent investigations without government influence at a high level.

Okay I can agree with those conclusions but you still need to actually prove that one of the buildings collapsed in this manner and prove the official story wrong.

Yes I do. Lets start with an overview which has been created by Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. These are professionals who have risked their professional reputations by investigating the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7 and going on the record to state that they believe the buildings were not brought down by the impact of planes alone.

As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 - 40 stories below demolition front
10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples
14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never "collapsed"

WTC Building 7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

1. Rapid onset of "collapse"
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a second before the building's destruction
3. Symmetrical "structural failure" -- through the path of greatest resistance -- at free-fall acceleration
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
7. Fore-knowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:

1. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
2. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
3. Chemical signature of thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never "collapsed".

So both the Twin Towers and WTC-7 displayed all of the characteristics of controlled demolition and none of those associated with a progressive fire induced collapse.

However just to keep things simple lets concede that the Twin Towers did collapse due to the fires caused by the plane crashes. This still leaves the "smoking gun" of 9.11 which is the collapse of WTC-7 which was not hit by a plane and only suffered limited fires before it collapsed at near freefall speed into its own footprint in the afternoon of 9.11. The following points explain just why the collapse of WTC-7 is so problematic for the official story of collapse by fire alone.

Evidence exists that the owner of the building, Larry Silverstein, wanted to bring the building down. Not only did he make the famous "pull it" comment in a documentary about the events of the day but a recent FOX hit piece on Jesse Ventura by ex Washington D.C. prosecutor Jeffrey Scott Shapiro reveals that during the day he was on the phone to his insurance company attempting to convince them that the building should be brought down via controlled demolition.

"I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard....Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building - since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall."

Numerous witnesses have gone on the record to say they were told beforehand that WTC-7 was going to be brought down by a controlled demolition. These witnesses include:

Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue, Kevin McPadden, who said that he heard the last few seconds of the countdown on a nearby police radio.

Emergency Medical Technician Indira Singh who was told by the fire department that Building 7 was going to be brought down deliberately due to collateral damage.

Another EMT named Mike wrote in a letter to the Loose Change film crew that emergency responders were told Building 7 was about to be "pulled" and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.

"There were bright flashes up and down the sides of Building 7, you could see them through the windows...and it collapsed. We all knew it was intentionally pulled... they told us," he stated.

Former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer who said that he heard demolition charges go off inside the building as it collapsed.

The non peer reviewed NIST report into the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is based on a computer model that they won't release the source code for. This computer model has been thoroughly rubbished by many people for not bearing any resemblance to the actual collapse of the building as it occurred and it relies on some dodgy programming that seems to have loaded the parameters to create the desired outcome.

They did this by excluding important parts of the building that they themselves admitted were present in an interim report as well as assuming no thermal conductivity of steel in their model which meant that only one part of steel re-enforced concrete was heated causing the thermal expansion that supposedly caused the collapse. This video explains why the computer model was flawed.



However the major flaw in the NIST report into the collapse is that they had to admit that their report is not consistent with basic principles of physics due to a 2.25 second period during the collapse in which the building collapses at freefall speed for 100 ft. The only way this would be possible would be if all the floors beneath the top part of the building had been completed removed so that the roof had nothing to fall through apart from air!

If WTC 7 is represented by three parts A, B and C, where part A is floors 0-6, part B is floors 6-14 (24 meters tall) and part C is floors 14-47 (see picture left), free fall of part C is only possible if, e.g. part B (or more!) is suddenly and totally removed! Then part C free falls on part A.

Free fall dropping upper part C of WTC 7 (above floor 14) does not apply any loads at all on the structure below floor 14 during this time!

NIST has been asked to explain what David Ray Griffin calls a miracle but cannot do so. Their official position regarding the cause of the collapse is totally inconsistent with physical evidence and the laws of physics which is an obvious problem.

The last point to remember is that a number of scientists have analysed the dust from the collapse of the World Trade Center and found evidence of high explosive materials. The following is taken from a lecture given by Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth recently.

The energetic material that was found in the WTC dust by an international team of scientists (led by Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark) was reported in the peer-reviewed Bentham Open Journal of Chemical Physics. It consists of nano-engineered iron oxide and aluminum particles 1000th the size of a human hair, embedded in another substance consisting of carbon, oxygen, and silicon. The sizes of the iron oxide particles are extremely uniform, and neither they nor the ultra-fine-grain aluminum platelets could possibly have been created by a natural process such as a gravitational collapse or the impact of jetliners. The red/gray chips in which these particles were found exhibit the same characteristics as advanced energetic materials developed in US national laboratories in the years leading up to 9/11.

Many people who follow the official line have tried to combat these studies by saying that the particles found within the dust were only by-products from the various office furnishings and other building materials. They have also claimed in a number of documentaries that the amount of Thermite / Thermate explosive required to bring down a building would be too large and would have required a large scale operation to install however numerous people have carried out their own experiments to show that this is not the case.

The following video is a good example of someone using physical science to back up the theory behind controlled demolition at the WTC.



As you can see not only did the collapse of WTC-7 look like and behave like a controlled demolition there is evidence to support this from witnesses, reporters, physical experiments and scientific analysis as well as the fact that the NIST version of events is total hogwash that cannot even follow the basic laws of physics.

Logic, reason and good science dictate that there is more than enough evidence for a controlled demolition of WTC-7 to warrant a proper investigation.

Remember if this building was brought down deliberately and not caused by secondary fires caused by falling debris from the Twin Towers then it means that we have been lied to on a massive scale. Not only has there been a huge cover up involving sections of the media and major government agencies but it also means that there is a lot more to the events of that day than we have been led to believe.

WTC-7 is the Ace of Spades sitting at the bottom of a house of cards that the official story is built out of. Once you take the blinkers off and look at the evidence surrounding WTC-7 objectively it becomes quite clear that the evidence points towards a controlled demolition. If we can prove that this one part of the story is based on a massive lie and cover-up then it takes a huge chunk out of the official story and opens up the whole sad event to proper scrutiny.

Surely you must agree?