Google AI analysis of Moon Landing photos show it was faked at AI conference
By Dark Politricks
I thought for a bit of fun and to get away from all the doom and gloom of Gaza, Ukraine and Donald Trump, that a good old conspiracy theory orientated article was needed to argue about.
There are a few main conspiracies that have stuck around us for decades.
Whilst modern ones like the assassination attempts on Donald Trump, COVID, and the Epstein files, seem to be getting ignored in the both the alternative and Legacy Media, there are still a few good ones that will never die, and always seem to be debated, such as who killed JFK, and was 9.11 an inside job.
Another good one is the Moon Landing by Apollo 11.
Did we really go to the moon, or was the whole mission faked for geopolitical reasons?
Or as I would frame it.
Did NASA really go to the moon in 1969, and what the world saw on their TV sets back then, really was Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the Moon.
Or was the footage of the landing faked on a film set, whether or not we actually did go to the moon?
Can people hold conflicting conspiracy, or rather scientific theories in their head at the same time?
Can someone believe in Moon based conspiracy theories,
And still believe in,
Aliens, man made UAPS, and Steven Greers "Lost Century", of progress made due to Zero Point Energy, the sort Nikola Tesla and other inventors found out about at the beginning of the 20th Century, who were constantly silenced.
So is it possible for someone to believe in both;
"Free energy" from the Aether (now called the Quantum Vacuum), which was proved by The Casimir Effect.
AND believe in...
Theories such as, we didn't go to the moon at all in 1969, and it being all staged due to the Space Race.
All because of JFK's promise to go to the Moon by the end of the century.
Then as many people believe, due to NASA realising that it was impossible to achieve this feat, they decided to fake the whole event to win the propaganda based space race against the USSR.
It seems like an impossible equation doesn't it?
How can you believe we had the power to harness gravity, and access unlimited power from an empty cup of air in the 1940's, possibly after reverse engineering downed alien space craft like The Roswell Incident in 1947.
As well as believing that we couldn't reach the moon in 1969?
If we had the power to utilise Zero Point Energy, and control gravity so that we could fly around at incredible speeds in UAPs back in the late 1940s, then why wouldn't we be able to reach the moon in such craft by 1969?
Well if you take the head of Lockheed Skunkworks, Ben Rich's word for it, then just before he died he claimed:
And that the problem was just that all the technology was locked up in off the books, Unacknowledged Special Access Projects, that are controlled by private MIC companies and not Government agencies.
Also, if you listen to Steven Greer, he will tell you the history of how these private companies took full control of these projects, reversed engineered craft and owned the technology that came from it, without any Government oversight.
Even the President and the head of the CIA, were asking HIM, why they couldn't access these Unacknowledged Special Access Projects.
Well buckle up for what seems like a big own goal that is not making much media noise by Google's own AI analysis, of the Apollo 11 moon landing footage.
I guess it's due to their AI system talking to Putin before Trump that might be the cause for silence on the topic.
Anyway...
Recently at the Artificial Intelligence Journey 2023 Conference in Moscow. The Russian President was shown a photographic neural network created by Google, which brought into question the authenticity of Apollo 11 Moon Landing footage.
During the event, the Russian President was shown an AI analysis of the moon landing, with the claim that images of the US astronauts landing on the moon were not authentic.
Putin and Nikolai Gerasimenko from Sberbank watched a Google neural network analysis of the moon landing, which suggested the possibility of synthetic photographs having been used.
President Putin, apparently just said “Very interesting,” when he was told by Gerasimenko, that the neural network “considered almost everything” in the photographs and film of the US landing on the moon to be fake.
Also, most importantly, that "no bias" could be found, because the analysis is based on Google’s own neural network, an American system.
Neither the U.S. nor NASA have commented on the Google AI analysis of the Moon photos, or Putin’s response.
You can read an article about it here and NO, it is not from a Russian news site, it's an Australian site.
I just had to use Yandex, a Russian based search engine to find it, as Google obviously doesn't want people to know about this news.
What do I think?
I've gone back and forth over this issue in my head as new evidence is uncovered, also as NASA videos come out revealing that in designing the next rockets to take man into the Solar System, they can't get past Low Earth Orbit (LEO), due to radiation from the Van Allen belts, have come to the surface.
For instance in this video a NASA engineer talks about their next rockets, Orion, and how it has to do non human test flights through the Van Allen belts, so that scientists can study the data collected about the radiation and how dangerous it is.
This is obviously something that wasn't carried out before Apollo 11's epic voyage in the late 1960's.
The NASA engineer says:
“We must solve these challenges before sending humans through this region of space”.
If we went through this region of Space in what was paper thin protection in the 1960's, compared to todays spaceships, then you would expect them to know how to achieve this already.
It sure would have helped if NASA hadn't decided to destroy all the technical data on how we achieved the Apollo flights, in the first place.
In a 2016 interview, veteran NASA astronaut Don Pettit made the following statement:
"I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore.
We used to but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again."
I have, like many, watched the back and forth between scientists and researchers who have debated shadows, stars not appearing in photos, flags waving on the Moon, background scenes used in Hollywood at the time, plus other photo anomalies.
Sometimes I hear something that seems convincing, but then I hear a valid rebuttal of the idea, so I have been very open on the subject.
I have often wondered that if the Space Race was so important to win for the USA, then why didn't the scientists from the Manhattan Project that went on to work for the Nuclear Agencies and MIC companies, that seemed to control a lot of the hidden physics that UAPs are built around, help the Government in this endeavour.
Why didn't they let NASA use a modern Zero Point Energy based system to get to the moon?
Then I always come back to the control mechanism that this planet is currently based upon, which people like Steven Greer are trying to break.
The world is based on a Petro-Carbon economy, and the 0.1% of people at the top of the pyramids of power don't want us to have free energy, as it would hurt their bank balance, as well as their grip on the mechanisms of global power.
So a display of using such energy to get to the moon would have let the cat out of the bag, so to speak, and people would have started asking awkward questions.
Of course some of us did anyway, but a global display of this control over gravity without having to use rocket fuel to get to the moon, would have been too obvious a display of the goodies they controlled.
They didn't want normal people to be able to replace paying for Oil and Gas, and use free energy devices to heat their homes, and power their modes of transport.
There has been lots of debate over the Apollo missions, trying to prove that NASA actually managed to reach the moon, with little tests beforehand, and many failed unmanned attempts to land, and lift back off the moon.
Also when there have been attempts to photograph or visit the Apollo lunar sites, either NASA or the US Government has stepped in to prevent it.
The US Congress passed a law in 2020 declaring all six Apollo lunar landing sites national heritage sites and off-limits to any other nation or private space company.
"protect and preserve the historic and scientific value of US government lunar artifacts", in 2012.
In 2021, during a YouTube webinar, an official of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) unveiled two low-resolution photographs of the Apollo 11 and 12 landing sites reportedly taken by the Indian Chandrayaan-2 lunar exploration mission.
These are currently the most detailed landing site photographs available, but skeptics have disputed their authenticity and origin.
However, the point that convinced me that we went to the Moon, was that I was informed by a video debunking conspiracies about the mission, that thousands of people with telescopes all over the world, watched the trip happen with their own eyes.
If I hadn't of heard that people watched the Apollo 11 rocket fly to the moon with telescopes, then I would have had more questions, but then Apollo 8 managed to get to the moon, it just didn't have a moon lander.
Apollo 11 apparently manged to go to the moon with less computing power than a modern smart phone multiplied by a hundred thousand.
They had less computing power than the first Spectrum and Amstrad PCs. The iPhone 11 has more than a million times computing power than Apollo 11's guidance computer which only had 74KB ROM and 4KB RAM.
So the main question I want answered about NASA space missions is this.
If we went to the moon in the 60s with less computing power than a modern day calculator.
Then why can we not leave Low Earth Orbit (LEO) now?
Sure we can send non human Satellites, and James Webb & Hubble telescopes past LEO, but we can't for some reason place the International Space Station, or even attempt to send a test flight with humans aboard, out of LEO.
Why?
Surely since 1972 our technology has advanced a bit.
The reason given by NASA, is that it cost too much money, £257bn (in todays money), to achieve the feat, and people have lost interest in Space.
However that is not really accurate.
The recent rescue of NASA astronauts by Elon Musk's SpaceX rocket engaged the people, and there is enough talk about UAP's even in Congress, that if all the MIC companies with machines that could fly to the moon in minutes were made public.
Then I think the people would be highly engaged, and very much interested.
However, that would never happen until the Petro-Carbon economy is overthrown.
The Globalists in control of possible Secret Space Fleets, Breakaway Civilisations, and the mining of asteroids for trillion dollars of rare minerals, don't want to risk losing the massive income they currently make from selling Oil and Gas to us plebs.
However, even if we went to the moon, I have never believed the photos and film were real for the reasons listed below.
I agree with Google's AI analysis of the photos and film, and no they are not the usual flag, shadows and stars arguments:
1. Prior to the manned Apollo 8 lunar orbiting mission in December 1968, NASA had not sent any animals through the Van Allen radiation belts.
When the Apollo 11 mission went to the Moon, they did not know what effect the radiation from passing the belts, the strong Sun rays on the Moon, and walking on the lunar surface, would have on any camera film footage taken.
This was a recent excuse given by a NASA scientist on designing the next space flight to leave LEO, on why we currently can't do so.
They don't understand the effect this radiation would have on human beings.
If they don't know the effect on humans now, because for some strange reason NASA decided to destroy all the data needed to go back in the future.
Then the question remains how did they manage it back in 1969?
Even if we admit they did manage it in 1969. Then I want to know how would NASA know the effect on camera film or even the television signal sent back home from the Moon, passing through this strong radiation belt.
It might have failed, or destroyed the film due to radiation, and it was totally untested until the actual event.
Showing live footage to the world would have been a big gamble if NASA did not even know if the TV signal would reach Earth okay to be viewed live.
It was a risk they could not take I suggest, which is why they only had one stream to a single TV in NASA HQ, which is why all the News stations like the BBC/NBC had to film the footage from that TV box 2nd hand.
I believe NASA filmed the the first moon walk on a filmset before the actual launch.
Whether they went to the Moon or not is moot in my argument, as I am only arguing that the film, and photos from the Moon were faked. It seems a Google AI analysis of that footage agrees with me.
2. All the photos are beautifully taken on the way to the moon with a Hasselblad camera, and when on the lunar surface, the camera was mounted on a bracket on the chest of the astronaut’s space suit.
 |
Astronaut Buzz Aldrin walks on the surface of the Moon near the leg of the lunar module Eagle during the Apollo 11 mission. |
Neil Armstrong apparently took 120 pictures whilst on the Moon, and during the total six successful Apollo missions, a total of 12 astronauts walked on the surface of the moon, and took a combined total of around 25,000 photographs.
The question is how did they manage to take so many perfect pictures in the little time they spent outside?
On a podcast with people who had investigated it for years. I will always remember one researcher saying:
The maths just doesn't work. They just didn't have the time to take so many perfect pictures.
How did they manage so many perfectly taken photos with their chest bound cameras, whilst experiencing weightlessness for the first time, and doing their other tasks?
How many camera shots were badly taken due to the experience of being on the lunar surface for the first time, with gravity issues, and a chest bound camera with no viewfinder, unlike those we have on our smart phones today?
They would have been constantly taking pictures with their chest bound cameras, with no time to pick up the 400kg of moon rocks, they supposedly brought back home.
However fake moon rocks have been uncovered, like the famous incident where a Dutch museum realised their rock was just petrified wood.
"The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood."
Its amazing what Buzz Aldrin keeps finding in his sock drawer to auction off.
3. Why did NASA force everyone to film one TV in their HQ for their coverage rather than just beam it worldwide?
That's why the original TV footage of the Moon landing is so grainy and such poor quality.
The BBC for instance, along with all other major news corporations covering the mission, literally had to point a camera at a TV, where a single stream was being shown. It would be like me videoing my TV on my phone, but using 1960s tech.
It would also have made any conspiracy to hide the fake moon footage, which could have been recorded months before the event, so much easier.
They would have even been able to hide the lie from the staff working at NASA, who were all compartmentalised, none of them would have known if the footage being shown, was live or recorded, before the flight.
4. The press conference with the astronauts after their return to earth and isolation period for "safety reasons"
I am not sure whether MK Ultra psychiatrist Jolyon West passed by for a visit at anytime, as the 3 astronauts look like silent stunned rabbits caught in the headlights, when they were finally famously interviewed.
It is as if they are doped up on strong drugs, or hypnotised to act disinterested and not as if they just accomplished a great feat for the USA.
Or were they just totally embarrassed because they knew they were total frauds sitting in front of the world's press, pretending they were heroes?
It is very strange behaviour I think for 3 people who should have been raving about their record breaking experience, as the first people to walk on the moon.
5. The film maker Bart Sibrel, found NASA footage, not meant for us to see, that suggests even the TV stream of the Astronauts halfway to the moon on day 2 were actually still flying in LEO.
He used this in his documentary "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" that shows the astronauts in Low Earth Orbit pretending they were halfway to the moon.
They did this by using a cardboard cutout on the window of the craft to make the earth look smaller as if they were halfway to the moon.
Also a CIA secret radio channel is heard telling them to wait 4 seconds before replying to a radio message.
This is supposedly so it seemed like a longer radio delay, as if the ship was halfway to the moon and not still in LEO.
Of course people have videos debunking the film, but that is up to you to decide whether the Apollo 11 mission actually went to the Moon or not.
I think they went, whether they did everything the video shown to one screen in NASA HQ happened or not I don't know.
However, I think all the photos were staged, along with the video footage.
In this regards, I agree with Googles AI analysis of the images from the mission.
Google is part of the CIA, so I am basically agreeing with the CIA for once!
You might also find this recent interview with Bart Sibrel interesting.
In it, he discusses the documentary, Google AI analysis of the photos, attempts on his life, killings of whistleblowers, deathbed confessions and more.
Now if NASA did fake the moon landing, I don't know why didn't Russia blow the whistle on the fake voyage for PR purposes.
However, apart from the usual theories you hear about this, maybe it was because the Soviets didn't want the USA to reveal that maybe Yuri Gagarin, wasn't actually the first person into space.
In fact according to some people, he was just the first of about 10 Soviet astronauts that actually made it home alive.
There could probably be a few old Soviet rockets circling earth right now, with skeletons of Russian cosmonauts and dogs, that never made it back to the motherland.
Maybe once the USA had won the propaganda war, they gave up on their own attempts to land a man on the moon.
Or maybe just as they are doing now, and as JFK wanted until he was killed. Russia and the USA are still collaborating on space missions, NASA ones, and Globalist Dark Fleet Missions, that we just don't know the full details about.
Only the other week, a Russian spacecraft safely delivered an American astronaut Jonathan Kim and two Russian cosmonauts to the International Space Station (ISS).
This has been going on for years, all through the US proxy war in Ukraine against Russia, and during periods of sanctions.
It seems whatever else is going on, when it comes to Space, the USA and Russia are happy to cooperate.
This is of course ignoring any discussion on aliens, and the theory that we never went back to the Moon because we were warned to stay away.
Or alleged agreements with aliens such as the Greada Treaty, which President Eisenhower supposedly signed which allowed for an exchange of advanced technology for the aliens to abduct humans.
There is also the theory that the Breakaway Civilisation, that is controlled by a Globalist Cartel has it's own Space Fleet that uses advanced technology, that Lockheed Skunkworks Ben Rich admitted we could take ET home with, and is hidden from the global population.
The NASA project, run mostly by NAZI scientists, the USA brought over after WWII in Operation Paperclip, was just a propaganda project for us mere mortals.
All whilst a Secret Cabal of Globalists, use the forbidden technology such as Zero Point Energy from Quantum Vacuums, to run their own space operations and work hand in hand with alien entities.
Plus a before and after photo of a supposed alien spacecraft on the moon he found on US military computer systems.
He apparently found a photo of a cigar shaped spacecraft on the moon, and then the same picture but with the spacecraft airbrushed out.
The USA definitely tried their best to lock him up forever, even waiting for the UK to change its extradition treaty before an endless court battle.
If he all he had done was use a simple to make port scanner to find open ports and blank admin passwords on Naval Base computers, as he claims, then he should have been awarded money for "ethical hacking", as they call it now, rather than the torment he went through.
So back to my question.
Why have humans not been able or willing to leave Low Space Orbit since the Apollo missions ended?
When you ask Google why we haven't left LEO since the Apollo missions the main reason given is money and a loss in public interest.
However if we are willing to let our government spend billions on never ending wars then I am sure the "First human space flight out of Low Earth Orbit" would actually be quite a newsworthy event and I am sure Elon Musk's SpaceX, would love to take the reigns if NASA won't.
So if Google's AI system really knows the answer, they are obviously hiding it from us peasants.
However, it only confirms what I have long suspected about the footage from the Moon, it was faked, whether or not we went there in 1969.
Here is a video that shows Putin's reaction to being told America's own Google, thinks the Apollo footage is fake.
Thoughts?
By Dark Politricks
© 2025 - Dark Politricks