Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts

Friday, 21 December 2018

What level of tyranny will it take for Americans to use the 2nd Amendment as intended?

What level of tyranny will it take for Americans to use the 2nd Amendment as intended?

By Dark Politricks

After all the furor of the last few weeks and the Sandy Hook shootings and the media debate afterwards what I want to know is what level of tyranny do Americans feel is enough to break the barrier and make their cherished 2nd Amendment useful.

As we are constantly told the 2nd Amendment is not so Americans can go hunting ducks with M16's or use their AK47's for shooting tin cans off the garden wall - no it's for preventing an over reaching, tyrannical government from taking control of their country.

As Thomas Jefferson said in 1803:

"None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important."

There are many levels to this debate and you can go on many tacks including:

1. American citizens have voted for the Congressmen and President that has then taken away their civil liberties. Therefore in a democracy the majority have spoken and it is their own fault for participating in their own loss of liberty and freedom.

2. Obama is in no way like Hitler, Mao or Stalin. They just declared their laws and the deed was done. They didn't have to battle for years in the Congress and Senate to get a health-care plan watered down and then passed after multiple compromises with political opponents. If Obama was truly a dictator he would have just clicked his fingers and used one of the "signing statements" to make "it so", so to speak. A dictator doesn't give in to an elected body he just says what he wants and it gets done.

3. For personal reasons I wouldn't like to live in a country full of guns. For one I would probably be dead, in a wheelchair or in prison by now after my teenage tearaway years. The other is that I know in the UK, although more violent than the USA (as a recent study showed) at least when we fall out of the bars drunk we fight with our fists and not guns. With our love of alcohol and a plentiful supply of guns we would see every town high street full of dead bodies every weekend, and that's not even thinking about our dodgy police who I have personally seen battering people for no good reason.

4. America has the most sophisticated and well equipped armed forces in the world. Despite the wishes of the founding fathers that there would be no standing army during peace time it seems the USA has got round this by engaging in a period of permanent war. The armed forces have replaced the militias and does any American think their handgun or automatic would take down an Apache helicopter if they turned on the citizens? What level of weapon should a citizen have anyway? Where does it say they can only have certain types of guns and not RPG's or even anti-aircraft weapons? Where is the line drawn?

However ignore all that and just think that YOU ARE ALREADY LIVING UNDER TYRANNY!

Therefore why crow on about the real reason of the 2nd Amendment when you have done NOTHING to stop the rise of tyranny over the last 18 years.

Ever since 9.11 you have:

Been living under Emergency laws that give the President dictatorial like powers.

Seen the removal of Habeas corpus and the introduction of death without judicial oversight on the Presidents say so.

Witnessed laws passed such as the NDAA that allow the President to assassinate or lock up indefinitely US citizens who he believes pose a threat to the country. As the released MIAC documents showed this includes PATRIOTS, Libertarians, Ron Paul supporters, ex-military and people who believe in the primary law of the USA - the constitution. They are all now to be treated as domestic terrorists!

A surveillance state in which you are monitored on and offline all day long. From your car to your home phone, mobile, shopping purchases to all your computer activities, and all without the need for warrant or due process. Numerous systems from TRAPWIRE to the TSA's naked body scanners, CCTV and now mobile radar vans all capturing your journey from home to work and back. All your Internet traffic has been monitored for ages and now your naked body is monitored as well. All this info is now stored and recorded in real time and then logged in huge city sized databases.

The rise of a two tier state between the super rich and everyone else. A country in which if you hang out with the President you can breach privacy laws, hack computers and never face the threat of imprisonment. But, if you are like Aaron Swartz, and don't have the luxury of a huge drug dealing, terrorist bankster operation behind you like HSBC or you don't own Facebook or Google (both companies who have committed similar hacks and many breaches of privacy) - BUT most importantly have ties with the CIA and NSA, plus their owners get to hang out with the President and other big wigs at Davos and Bilderberg. Then you are looking at 50+ years in prison as Aaron was.

It is now provable that if you are too big to fail you are also too big to prosecute. If you are tool cool to bend over to the state security apparatus as Google, Microsoft and other big Internet companies have all done you are okay, but if you don't like Aaron then you are just a target to be taken down in anyway possible.

Permanent war. Even once bin-Laden has been killed you are still content on wasting trillions of borrowed and made up money to fight a people who have never been beaten and in which 92% of these people don't even know about 9.11 or have even heard of the Twin Towers. 

They just see you as another invader following on from the Soviets and the British Empire and the dozens of other beaten armies that also failed before them. You won't win in the Stan. I would bet a house on it!

Therefore if you don't think that a few of these facts, out of many others I could have listed, on their own reach the bar of tyranny that you are so fond of protecting then what level does the bar have to be raised for you to use to the 2nd Amendment as you see it designed?

Either stop voting for scoundrels and liars OR take people like Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Dennis Kucinich, Gary Johnson, Jill Stein and many other politicians seriously.

These are just a few people from all ends of the political spectrum who believe the US has already entered this realm of tyranny in which the CIA/NSA, banksters and warmongers have already won over the common person and that serious reform is needed to roll back this Amerikan police state.

Either there is no level it can be raised to and you will accept all forms of tyranny and you just need to admit that you really really like your guns and just shooting shit.

OR you honestly believe in the 2nd Amendment.

If it's the latter then I really want to know - what will it take for you to do something?



Monday, 9 October 2017

Were there multiple shooters at Las Vegas - Poll thinks so

People Think There Were Multiple Shooters In Las Vegas

By Dark Politricks

Before "they" take this video down or close this persons account as they did my own, you might as well watch this video.

Remember videos like this are constantly de-monetized or shut, usually by BOTS or automatic programs that check METADATA and other info such as people reporting tweets as rude or inflammatory, seemingly by those who don't believe in free speech.

Plus the BOTS they use to analyse and flag up photos due to the percentage of flesh tone on show. Relying on a BOT for this is a very bad idea not without automatic human checking of flagged photos before a blog is closed or money stopped for the article.

I have had threats to stop my revenue from clicks due to old articles that have been fine for 5+ years that some do-gooder has found and made a complaint OR a BOT has seen a picture of people on a beach and the flesh tone % is too high and the article is automatically flagged as porn, a pedo piece or containing other sexual activity. This is why relying on BOTS alone to find and stop money going to content makers or even closing blogs they control is a bad idea.

They don't automatically get a human to check these flagged videos or pictures as they should.

Instead they wait for the owner to find out and respond to the complaint. If you don't do it in time you lose the blog forever. I recently found out that I have lost two sporting blogs for not realising there was a problem within the 90 days they give you to find out and then refute the complaint.

I must have been stupid as the same content was on the blog for over 7 years so I thought it was safe - guess not. I am pretty gutted to lose that blog as it proved my horse racing tipping skills for free and helped other people wanting to do the same thing.

The only photo was my logo and the most rudest speech was a horse's name.

I can only imagine the hasbara brigade are trying to shut me down due to content on this site as yesterday this site was down due to a hole in a WordPress plugin that had been over-written with an encoded piece of PHP that ran automatically on start-up. Always keep backups people!

Often you are only told it breaks the companies TOS (Terms of Service), not which part, which would be very helpful. Instead you are given just a link to knowledge base article which is not very useful at all. Through these automatic means I have lost 4 Google Blogger blogs, 1 I got back after twice being blocked and then given back after a human overlooked it. As it was purely to do with clowns I can only guess someone is following and reporting me for spurious reasons.

Google communities related to horse racing with over 3,000 people have been removed from my control, Facebook pages linked to a business I used to run and the Twitter account it posted to was "unpublished" so no-one but me can see it, and groups where you select the audience i.e "Secret Groups" have been shut down.

So it's not just sites like Prison Planet under attack on the right or the Jimmy Dore show on the left, it's sites all over with no safety net for the content owners.

This just proves a "secret group" is no more secret to Facebook staff who read personal messages as well as all your profile content as meaningless. It also proves that this new Google/Facebook/CIA/NSA collaboration is not just aimed at #altnews readers and content makers but also just competitors to big companies who currently control the arena you are trying to enter.

Therefore if you have a piece of news you want like-minded, free thinkers and debaters (not moaners), to find your tweets or Facebook content, add the hashtag #altnews to your post or tweet. Just add the hashtag to your posts so that people know they are coming from an alternative perspective than the official narrative.

The following video shows the Las Vegas shooting from the perspective of a taxi driver and you can hear multiple shots being fired seemingly from different automatic weapons.

The person whose tweet I have also included added a vote on whether his followers thought that the shootings in Las Vegas were done by a single person, multiple people or there were no shooters.

I guess guns set to fire on demand at a certain direction by remote control or maybe he meant no shooters as in no REAL citizen shooters e.g CIA assets or unwitting dupes under the spell of assassination.

It is very eye-opening.



The results of whether people thought the attack was a single shooter or multiple are below in this tweet.


So the poll is closed but you can still comment on this article or on Twitter. I wouldn't put it past the deep state to label the shooter a gun nut, Trump supporting, neo-nazi with an ancestry that links him up to other traitors and pre WWII neo-nazis like Prescott Bush.

It's totally surprising that the neo-nazis/cons haven't got the fool under their thumb already. Maybe he was shown the 4 kill shot angles of JFK as I always say new Presidents are on inauguration day to show just who is REALLY IN POWER, and Trump is just acting his role as the puppet on the end of an iPhone stuck on Twitter, honestly believing that he makes policy by calling out other world leaders and trolling them at 3am.

He is the worst negotiator I have seen whilst claiming to be the best, and if the world ends under his reign as leader of the free world I would put a very large bet on if there was any point. I just wish Google hadn't shut my blog as I would have put up a piece on some very profitable bets you could have made.

A new war under Trump - almost a certainty so try for the best odds.

Trumps is impeached - definitely.

Some of Trumps team are impeached - definitely.

A hurricane hits the White House during a presidential speech blowing Trumps orange wig into the eye of the storm - this is worth a shot considering the amount of hurricanes hitting the USA at the moment.

-A World War III scenario could occur if Rocket Boy is on the end of a Trump pre-emptive strike. This of course would be nothing new when it comes to the US breaking the International Law they helped create at the Nuremberg trials. Victors justice as they say. If Russia's pull over him having him frolic with prostitutes on Hillary's bed makes him no use anymore could easily occur but then you want to collect your winnings so that's a tricky one.

Trump not building any sort of NEW wall at all - definitely worth a shot.

Repealing Obamacare or fulfilling any of his pre-election promises that "it will be cheaper, you won't lose coverage and you will all love it" - definitely good chance of this happening.

Melania Trump divorcing Trump during office - this looks like a good bet as I don't even think I've seen the pair hold hands so far. Maybe a spread bet on the number of days it takes for a public photo to appear with the first couple at least acting in love would be a good bet.

The problem is that can you find a bookie that will offer you any good prices on these bets. If so let me know!

Anyway, tell me what you heard in that video. To me it sounded like a multitude of automatic gun fire raining down on the population. What will happen now the attacker was white and not a Mexican, Black or FBI setup Muslim terrorist?

More Fake News blaming it on those evil neo-nazi's Trump was only praising just the other day?

Or actual gun control legislation being passed despite the NRA forgetting that they long missed their chance to prevent at least 2 coups since JFK which was the 2nd amendment's main reason - or so I thought it was.

If it was just to shoot cans off walls or hunt animals to show how manly you are then I see no point in keeping it.

Remember add #altnews to your tweets and Facebook public profile messages and check out the main site for more alternative news stories here at Dark Politricks.

By Dark Politricks


© 2017 Dark Politricks

Friday, 25 January 2013

My own thoughts on the American love of guns and the 2nd Amendment


My own thoughts on the American love of guns and the 2nd Amendment

By Dark Politricks

After all the furor of the last few weeks and the Sandy Hook shootings and the media debate afterwards what I want to know is what level of tyranny do Americans feel is enough to break the barrier and make their cherished 2nd Amendment useful.

As we are constantly told the 2nd Amendment is not so Americans can go hunting ducks with M16's or use their AK47's for shooting tin cans off the garden wall - no it's for preventing an over reaching, tyrannical government from taking control of their country.

As Thomas Jefferson said in 1803:
"None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important."
There are many levels to this debate and you can go on many tacks including:

1. American citizens have voted for the Congressmen and President that has then taken away their civil liberties. Therefore in a democracy the majority have spoken and it is their own fault for participating in their own loss of liberty and  freedom.

2. Obama is in no way like Hitler, Mao or Stalin. They just declared their laws and the deed was done. They didn't have to battle for years in the Congress and Senate to get a health-care plan watered down and then passed after multiple compromises with political opponents. If Obama was truly a dictator he would have just clicked his fingers and used one of the "signing statements" to make "it so", so to speak. A dictator doesn't give in to an elected body he just says what he wants and it gets done.

3. For personal reasons I wouldn't like to live in a country full of guns. For one I would probably be dead, in a wheelchair or in prison by now after my teenage tearaway years. The other is that I know in the UK, although more violent than the USA (as a recent study showed) at least when we fall out of the bars drunk we fight with our fists and not guns. With our love of alcohol and a plentiful supply of guns we would see every town high street full of dead bodies every weekend. That's not even thinking about our bent dodgy police who I have seen on more than one occasion batter someone for no good reason. Bart Transport Police incidents would be occurring every day and I am thankful I have managed to fight our cops with my fists after they have attacked a young girl with batons just for walking out of a club with a beer, and didn't end up with a bullet in my back. They knew they were in the wrong and 12 of us were let go without charge in the morning all gun shot free. Our criminals are even having to rent guns due to the short supply and most guns used in crimes have already been used in previous crimes and are only re-activated de-commisioned guns - likely to go off in your own hand as it is to fire properly anyway.

4. America has the most sophisticated and well equipped armed forces in the world. Despite the wishes of the founding fathers that there would be no standing army during peace time it seems the USA has got round this by engaging in a period of permanent war. The armed forces have replaced the militias and does any American think their handgun or automatic would take down an Apache helicopter if they turned on the citizens? What level of weapon should a citizen have anyway? Where does it say they can only have certain types of guns and not RPG's or even anti-aircraft weapons? Where is the line drawn?

However ignore all that and just think that YOU ARE ALREADY LIVING UNDER TYRANNY!
Therefore why crow on about the real reason of the 2nd Amendment when you have done NOTHING to stop the rise of tryany over the last 10 years.

Ever since 9.11 you have:
Therefore if you don't think that a few of these facts, out of many others I could have listed,  on their own reach the bar of tyranny that you are so fond of protecting then what level does the bar have to be raised for you to use to the 2nd Amendment as you see it designed?

Either stop voting for scoundrels and liars OR take people like Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Dennis KucinichGary Johnson, Jill Stein and many other politicians seriously.

These are just a few people from all ends of the political spectrum who believe the US has already entered this realm of tyranny in which the CIA/NSA, banksters and warmongers have already won over the common person and that serious reform is needed to roll back this Amerikan police state.

Either there is no level it can be raised to and you will accept all forms of tyranny and you just need to admit that you really really like your guns and just shooting shit. OR you honestly believe in the 2nd Amendment.

If it's the latter then I really want to know - what will it take for you to do something?


View the original article "What level of tyranny will it take for Americans to make use of the 2nd Amendment" at the main site www.darkpolitricks.com