Is There A Leak In The Intelligence Services Or Does The Deep State Just Want Trump Dead?
By Dark Politricks
After the second assassination attempt on Presidential candidate Donald Trump at the weekend by convicted felon, Ryan Routh, we must ask ourselves, is there a leak in the security services supposedly meant to protect Trump, or does the Deep State so entwined with the Democratic party just want to make sure he never reaches polling day and by using patsies and professionals trying to kill him anyway they can?
Three of these teams are supposedly foreign, and I don't doubt as neo-con, warmonger, Lindsey Graham has already claimed, that Iran is supposedly behind some of these teams. If he is actually assassinated I can see Israel ready to come out with some rock solid intelligence, which many in the US intelligence community considering Israeli intelligence to be worthless unless benefiting Israel itself.
As Israeli news reports itself, U.S. national security officials consider Israel to be a frustrating ally and a genuine counterintelligence threat with it being implicated in US criminal espionage cases. In fact don't take my words for it, let Haaretz the Israeli newspaper spell it out for you.
"The CIA considers Israel its No. 1 counterintelligence threat in the agency's Near East Division, the group that oversees spying across the Middle East, according to current and former officials. Counterintelligence is the art of protecting national secrets from spies. This means the CIA believes that U.S. national secrets are safer from other Middle Eastern governments than from Israel."
I am sure that with the recent talk from Trump about how this up coming US election is "Israels most important election ever", and how he would "Make Israel Great again" as well as being "Israels best friend". It seems that if Trump is elected then Israel is going to get a green light to do a lot of evil in the region with open US backing rather than the current situation of the US backing them but pretending they are giving the Israeli's stern telling offs over the phone after every atrocity they are committing.
The insinuation is clear, if Trump is elected then Israel is clear to do a lot of things it feels it can't at the moment due to international pressure. This will include the annexing of the West Bank, the banning of any criticism of Israels foreign or domestic policy including their genocide and Human rights abuses as they try to starve and slowly kill the Gazan population, and having the US back them in any larger conflict against Hezbollah and Iran which Israel is busy stoking up.
One can only assume they are ratcheting up the war with Hezbollah trying to goad Israel into attack so that once Trump is elected they get to draw the US into a wider war with Iran, once again using the deaths of US soldiers to further their own policy of total dominance over the Middle East. I wouldn't even be surprised due to Israels duplicity concerning the US, whether one of these 5 assassination teams in the US, are Israeli cut outs. They know that if Trump is killed and they can blame it on Iran that the US would go full out heavy metal jacket in the region and possibly start World War III.
The first attempt on Trumps life at a rally in Pennsylvania, was a mixture of security set up to fail, with many buildings, including the one that Crooks shot from outside the security perimeter and possibly other snipers which were there to do the job, letting Crooks play the patsy fall guy.
Plus there is all the strangeness around the shooting including
Allowing a man with a scope walk around suspiciously without stopping him as if he was meant to be noticed.
A perimeter set up with so many buildings opposite the stage Trump was on just yards away but outside it. There was more car parking space in the security perimeter than buildings it seems.
I admit that I have little knowledge of guns but have watched multiple videos from ex snipers, second amendment activists and sound analysts, and for me I am still not sure whether Crooks fired all the 8 shots into the crowd and the one that hit Trump.
It sounds as if the first 3 shots were fired with a pause between each shot, and then the next 5 come very fast as if not from the semi-automatic gun Crooks was using.
There is a 9th shot that the FBI and Secret Service denied occurring, maybe that was from a police officer sniper who was shooting at but missed Crooks. Or maybe it was from a professional Sniper there to take Trump out if the job hadn't been done.
Then there is a very long wait for the admitted kill shot on Crooks. In fact it takes another 10 seconds for the shot to kill Crooks to occur.
Whether the first 8 shots were all fired by Crooks or not, there is definitely a 9th shot before the long pause which is unexplained for counter snipers who must have seen and heard the shooting, noticed the crowd pointing at the roof Crooks was on and so on before shooting a kill shot.
Why did they wait so long to kill the assassin?
Were they waiting for another attempt by their own sniper to take another shot at Trump due to the failure of the first 8/9?
There are plenty of videos on Rumble that delve into the sound analysis of each shot, where the cartridges would have fallen, and what Crooks head should have looked like after being shot. You can find these easily.
However, for a cursory overview watch the first 15.5 minutes of this video for gunshot analysis and the debate over the missing 9th shot that the FBI won't admit to.
After the first assassination attempt Dan Bongino in a Senate testimony said there would be more attempts on Trumps life and was attacked as just being a crazy conspiracy theorist. A two word creation of the CIA to dismiss anyone with alternative views on the JFK assassination and dismissive of their "magic bullet" theory. This slur has been used so much a bit like anti-Semite since Oct 7th 2023 that it has lost all meaning.
People in power collude, especially when their interests align, and all a conspiracy means is a crime where two or more people are involved, thousands of conspiracy cases are tried in courts across the world yearly.
Now after this second attempt on Trumps life we, like Dan, must start asking whether there is a leak in the Secret Services due to the fact an out of town, Ukraine mad shooter, sat in the woods of a golf course for 12 hours in the hope of killing Trump when he reached that hole.
Apparently only a few people in the Secret Service would have known about the non publicised visit by Trump and his billionaire friend to the golf course, although Piers Morgan believes it's a no brainer that when Trump is in Florida he plays golf there. However, Trump was in California before flying to Florida, so how did anyone know he would be going back to Florida in time to prepare this trap for him?
Although Dan tries to link the attempt to kill the ex President to Iranian threats and other state actors there could be other closer to home people who are desperate to kill the President. This is someone who has not fallen victim to earlier attempts to take him out of the Presidential race such as the numerous lawfare court cases, failed attempts to impeach him, and threats to ruin him by the intelligence services when leaving office if he dared pardon Julian Assange or Edward Snowden.
He didn't do those last two acts, but despite this the Deep State have come after him with everything they have got.
The NSA would have been able to intercept any Trump communications about plans to fly to Florida to go golfing, and Ryan Routh could have been notified about the golfing game in time for him to get to the course and plot up in the woods.
Whether he was or not will be hard to tell now as he has gone missing since that day, and his parents have filed a missing persons report and his phone has been off.
Routh would have definitely been on the CIA's watch list for travelling to Ukraine and trying to recruit people to fight out there. Before his social media was totally scrubbed which seems an odd thing to do especially on Twitter where you would expect Elon to allow people to read the postings of a suspect in such a case.
However, most of it was downloaded by #ALTNEWS reporters before it could be scrubbed and from this we could see his online connections to the CIA as his first ever people he followed worked there or were related to it. They even followed back which shows some sort of relationship between Routh and the intelligence services as well as his seemingly delusional obsession with Ukraine and getting people to come over to fight there.
The CIA certainly has a murky past with assassinations and who knows what MKULTRA like experiments they are getting away with in Ukraine outside the USA's jurisdiction. Routh could have become radicalised or brainwashed into a lone gunmen 60's style CIA hitmen for all we know.
We know that before Rouths social media was scrubbed people took data down from X that showed he followed particular CIA agents, and he was in Ukraine actually recruiting men to fight for the country war rather than the failed AZOV brigade worshipper kicked out for being mental we are being led to believe by the mainstream media.
Routh had a long criminal history with over 100 offences, many gun related, even one for possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Another similar charge was dropped despite it being related to being pulled over by cops whilst armed with a machine gun and barricading himself inside a building for three hours.
Routh eventually pleaded guilty to driving without a license and registration, resisting a public officer and carrying a concealed firearm, while the weapon of mass destruction charge was dropped. Routh's lengthy criminal record has only seen him being convicted in a handful of cases. Maybe someone high up was looking after him?
Whoever in the Deep State is behind these attempts on Trumps life I doubt we have heard the end of them and even if he wins the election, Democrats could pressure their DOJ bent judges to incarcerate him for one of the felony charges he faces. It would definitely be hard for Trump to be POTUS from behind bars but apparently not illegal under US law.
It would definitely be seen as sour grapes by a Democratic party that crows about Jan 6th and election result denials, totally forgetting totally how in 2016 they invented a tale of pee parties in Russian hotels and Russian hacking to account for Hillary Clinton's loss against Trump. Someone she actually urged to run for President thinking he would be easier to beat.
So there are many angles to see these attempts on Trumps life but the obvious links between both suspects (and the doppelganger Maxwell Yearick) and the two intelligence agencies known for both assassinations and creating crimes from under cover officers and unwitting victims as well as the invasion of privacy through dubious methods is something that we need to look at carefully.
One thing is certain. The left leaning MSM in the USA will try and blame Trump for this assassination attempt as many news shows already have, and if it's still in their news cycle and not memory holed within a fortnight I will be shocked,
You can watch Dan Bonjino break down his theories of leaks within the Secret Service below.
Ukrainian Exploits and Attacks in Russia could lead to Nuclear War
By Dark Politricks
At the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it seemed that some sense prevailed among Western leaders not to engage fully in the war encase that it led to a full-blown NATO v Russian World War 3 scenario.
However as the war progressed, and as"battlefield" experts kept claiming that Russia was on the defence. That their masterplan to storm and take Kyiv with a force at least an eighth of the size needed for the job of taking and controlling a city of millions had been halted, the rhetoric increased wildly, and "preventing World War 3", became "Making Money From Flooding Ukraine With Weapons".
There was of course Ukrainian propaganda showing disillusioned Russian POWS ringing their Mums whilst being filmed (a breach of the Geneva war treaty), and saying they didn't even know they were in Ukraine or had been misled and misfed, however, what would you say to your enemy when captured and not wanting to die on film?
It is no lie that some scared Russian generals had lied to Putin saying that they would be welcomed in every town they passed on the way to Kyiv, and they were quick to be dispatched and replaced by men who could get the job done seeing that the Zelenskyy government did not just fall at the sight of a 40 mile line of tanks outside its capital.
However, this massive force did do its part in "shaping the battlefield" by keeping a large proportion of the Ukrainian army in the west to defend the capital whilst their main objectives in the East were carried out. So sorry to say to the armchair generals, many on the boards of MIC companies who are making money from prolonging this war, that this was in no way a sign that the Ukrainians were "winning".
To remind those people who think the aim of the invasion was just to invade Kyiv, the initial declared objectives were:
Defend and take back the breakaway Russian-speaking parts of the Donbass, Donetsk and Lugansk who had signed a military cooperation treaties with Russiaas it was clear Ukrainian forces were encircling their areas, as well as on the way to take back Crimea who had already broken away from Ukraine years ago.
De-Nazify the Ukrainian military who had encompassed the AZOV Militia into the main army as a brigade and who were the main instigators of the many atrocities and massacres that had occurred during the last 8 years of fighting in the Donbass region.
De-militarise Ukraine so that its NATO trained army was no longer a force to be reckoned with.
Ensure Ukraine did NOT join NATO as was being touted by the Western "Defensive" Organisation.
As I have detailed in past articles, the lies that Russia was told about NATO not moving an inch toward Russia's borders since the fall of the Berlin Wall, and their desire to fight Russia in some way have long been known. Russia is vilified by the US Press at every election for supposed interfering as if the US never interferes in other country's elections, all despite proof coming out that this was just an excuse Hillary Clinton made up due to her loss to an orange-faced game show host.
However, despite Russia being the target of lies to cover Hillary Clinton's Presidential loss, the massive Russophobia that the US clearly had after these lies was not the cause of this current anti-Russian sentiment. The Afghan war was over, the MIC was looking for a new enemy to make money from, and Russia has always been a historical target of the US & UK, and now they have dragged the EU, which up until recently had good relationships with Russia, especially Germany, into their sanction misfire.
So whilst the plan of the sanctions was to crush the Russian economy and hopefully cause an uprising and overthrow of Putin's regime, it has in fact strengthened him and the rouble as the Russian people clearly see that their politician's rhetoric about the West hating Russia, is in fact, very true. This has given Putin carte blanche to go full ahead in his war with Ukraine as the Russian people now realise how Russophobic the west really is.
So as Russia forces EU countries to pay for their gas in roubles not dollars or Euro's, and whilst the EU and US are staggering into a recession, Russia is booming, with a massive surplus of roubles, and has started what looks like the destruction of the Petrodollars reign as currency supreme as they join the two most populous countries in the world, China and India in economic treaties, selling gas to allies on the cheap and cutting it off to European countries who refuse to inflate the value of the rouble by paying for the gas they want in their own currency.
This is a right-wing element who brags on Telegram, whilst laughing at Western media who likes to skip over the NAZI part, as they brag about being NAZI's, showing off tattoos of Swastikas on their backs like in the next video, and they have all been trained by NATO forces to do the dirty fighting that includes using human shields placed in hospital maternity wards and schools. They placed big guns, tanks, and other heavy arms on the roofs and on the bottom floors, all with kidnapped Ukrainian human shields in the middle of the buildings.
Of course, they ensured their own cars were moved from the area before they exploded bombs in the buildings and then claimed Russia had bombed these hospitals and schools from the air. The following video from Redacted have inserts from Tel-SUR, an AZOV soldier bragging about being a NAZI, and debunks the mass grave story which was doing the rounds lately.
So these NAZI's have no qualms about killing other Ukrainians all to blame on Russia, which of course the Western media just repeats as gospel without even a question raised. If it wasn't for the brave journalists on the ground like Patrick Lancaster who has been reporting on the truth of the war in the Donbass for the last 8 years, then many people would be none the wiser about the truth of the civil war that has been raging in east Ukraine for the last 8 years.
Here is a report I doubt any of you would have heard due to the West disbelieving anything that shows Ukrainian war crimes or paints their war with Russia in a bad light, even when the AZOV NAZI brigade kills Ukrainians and use them as human shields as detailed in Patricks video.
The fact that it is actually a proxy war being run by the US and NATO members from the western parts of Ukraine, which they seem to be able to enter and leave by whim, is a fact left out of many people's news on Ukraine's fight with Russia.
Whilst many people believe that they are standing with a proud Ukraine, led by the actor Zelenskyy, who has done nothing to deserve the Russian invasion and wants to win the war with Russia. It is actually the west, NATO, the US, and UK, who are directing the Ukrainian forces from their bases on the edges of the country. A fact that has not gone amiss by Putin and one that has been broadcast many times, for anyone who wants to know the full truth about the invasion.
This is just one report from a French journalist who went to Ukraine only to find out it was a war being run by NATO and the US, not Ukraine.
So when you virtue signal to the world by pinning a Ukrainian flag to your Twitter profile or other social media site, what is it that you are actually standing for?
Does it mean to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, as NATO seems to want, not caring about the civilians caught up in the war or the trapped soldiers with no supplies coming that are told to fight to the death?
Does it mean to pour more and more heavy weaponry into the country, despite the US not knowing where or even caring where it ends up. From one analysis, only 10% of all western arms are getting anywhere near the battlefields as Russian intelligence seems able to blow up most incoming western arms, as well as foreign legion training centres. They also blow up the railroads that would be needed to allow the transport of these arms eastwards where they are actually needed.
Also, recently, Russia warned the UK of an immediate and "proportional response" if it continues direct provocation of Ukraine and warned of the likelihood of nuclear war if NATO members continue to interfere in the war.
Also, a former head of the Polish army has accused Boris Johnson of “tempting evil” by revealing that Ukrainian soldiers were being trained in Poland in how to use British anti-aircraft missiles before returning with them to Ukraine. Gen Waldemar Skrzypczak, also a former junior defence minister, complained that a loose-lipped prime minister had revealed too much to the Russians and that his remarks risked the safety of the soldiers involved.
So more money and western weaponry go down the Ukrainian drain, and we are stupid to think that the Russians would not be able to detect and destroy any heavy weapons we try to smuggle into the country.
The western meddling by sending SAS saboteurs into Lviv, Ukraine, and NATO, who is really running the show, commanding Ukrainian attacks into Russia and the war in general. All thisis only making the day that a proxy war in which we are indebting Ukraine for decades to western banks whilst filling the coffers of the MIC, turns into a full-blown war with Russia closer and closer.
As RT is banned in most places, I have screenshotted their latest headline piece which warns of a nuclear conflict if we continue to fight Russia through Ukraine.
So does standing with Ukraine mean allowing ourselves to be turned into shadows on the pavement due to our political leader's long-held desire to fight Russia?
Their new Satan2 missile has already been shown off to warn us that they can hit us anywhere on earth, defeating any anti-missile defences, and turn a small country like the UK into atomic dust instantly.
So does standing with Ukraine mean to stand with the AZOV NAZI brigade, a term that was all over Western media before the war, but now excuses are made for their views, despite training videos of them all over social media appearing with NAZI symbols on their coats as they get trained by western forces.
Or does it mean to stand with a definitely non-democratic society as Ukraine plainly is?
…the head of the opposition political party which came in 2nd place in the election, and arrested and jailed its leaders (exactly what Putin has been accused of doing)—all with the support of U.S.
The usual solid US allies in Israel are also not happy with the US support of Ukrainian NAZI's who the world went to war to stop in the 30's and 40's as the US lifts bans on funding neo-NAZI Ukrainian groups.
"Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion, an independent unit that had been integrated into the former Soviet Republic’s national guard and was taking part in operations against Russian- backed rebels."
"Called a “neo-Nazi paramilitary militia” by Congressmen John Conyers Jr. and Ted Yoho, who co-sponsored the bipartisan amendment, the battalion has been a source of controversy since its inception. However, Congress is reported to have recently repealed its ban on a Ukrainian militia accused of being neo-Nazi, opening the way for American military assistance."
Or does it mean to stand with the "National Police" (ex AZOV Battalion members), who publicly announced a "cleansing" of the town of Bucha, in which bodies left on the street for a supposed two weeks were not mentioned when the town was reclaimed but then days later when the Russians had long left the town, seemingly freshly killed bodies appeared in videos on social media with claims of war crimes being laid at Russia's feet.
All the bodies had white bands on, either tying their hands behind them or on their arms, some with Russian aid packages by their sides, both clear signs of retribution against Russian sympathisers who took aid from the Russian forces. This was a false flag attack that only Ukraine gained anything from and in which Russian denials are heard by no-one.
New Srebrenica. The Ukrainian city of Bucha was in the hands of 🇷🇺 animals for several weeks. *Local civillians were being executed arbitrarily*, some with hands tied behind their backs, their bodies scattered in the streets of the city.#RussianWarCrimespic.twitter.com/outzejdidO
Now that this and other war crimes blamed on Russia were debunked by video, and the killings of POWS were allowed onto social media, the "Democratic Ukraine" we stand with, has made it illegal to film Russian attacks, lest they be debunked by online sleuths. One such debunking was done at the location of a missile attack at the Kramatorsk train station.
"The relationship of the booster when it came to earth, when assessed to the impact zone of the cluster munitions, provides a reverse azimuth which, even when factoring in a generous margin of error for potential drift, points to territory that was under the exclusive control of the Ukrainian government, which means that there is little doubt that the missile that struck the Kramatorsk train station was fired by a launcher under the operational control of the 19th Missile Brigade, Ukraine’s only Tochka-U-equipped unit..... a forensic evaluation of the missile debris clearly shows that it was launched by the 19th Ukrainian Missile Brigade, based near Dobropolia, some 45 kilometres from Kramatorsk."
This is a source that must be overlooked, just like the BBC, UK State TV if ever a news organisation was if we are also expected to overlook other supposed "biased" sources such as Russia Today.
So does "Standing with Ukraine" mean standing with the journalists who dare speak out about Ukrainian crimes and then just disappear or turn up dead?
Well as the US Pentagon is only too happy to admit, it is to give Russia such a bloody nose and to kill as many Russians as possible.
Here are just a few quotes:
On 24 February, during a White House press conference on the first day of Russia’s invasion, Biden said sanctions are designed not to prevent invasion but to punish Russia after invading “…so the people of Russia know what he has brought on them. That is what this is all about.”, this is despite of course the obvious fact by high inflation numbers and increasing heating costs that Europe is paying a high price to "punish Putin".
On 27 February, James Heappey, UK Minister for the Armed Forces, wrote in the Daily Telegraph: “His failure must be complete; Ukrainian sovereignty must be restored, and the Russian people empowered to see how little he cares for them. In showing them that, Putin’s days as President will surely be numbered… He’ll lose power and he won’t get to choose his successor.”
Finally, on 1 March, Boris Johnson’s spokesperson said the sanctions on Russia “we are introducing, that large parts of the world are introducing, are to bring down the Putin regime.”
So whilst anybody can sympathise with the displaced and killed Ukrainians who had nothing to do with Putin's invasion. It is totally stupid to believe that the act of invading Ukraine was totally irrational to anybody but those still sucking the teat of US/UK mainstream media.
The war began after the US-led Maiden coup in 2014, and the people of Donbass have been fighting a civil war for their rights ever since.
"The referendums conducted by the two self-proclaimed Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk in May 2014, were not referendums of "independence" (независимость), as some unscrupulous journalists have claimed, but referendums of "self-determination" or "autonomy" (самостоятельность). The qualifier "pro-Russian" suggests that Russia was a party to the conflict, which was not the case, and the term "Russian speakers" would have been more honest. Moreover, these referendums were conducted against the advice of Vladimir Putin."
"In fact, these Republics were not seeking to separate from Ukraine, but to have a status of autonomy, guaranteeing them the use of the Russian language as an official language — because the first legislative act of the new government resulting from the American-sponsored overthrow of [the democratically-elected] President Yanukovych, was the abolition, on February 23, 2014, of the Kivalov-Kolesnichenko law of 2012 that made Russian an official language in Ukraine. A bit like if German putschists decided that French and Italian would no longer be official languages in Switzerland."
"This decision caused a storm in the Russian-speaking population. The result was fierce repression against the Russian-speaking regions (Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, Lugansk and Donetsk) which was carried out beginning in February 2014 and led to a militarization of the situation and some horrific massacres of the Russian population (in Odessa and Mariupol, the most notable)......." read the rest of the article here.
Now if you want to "Stand with Ukraine", then really you should qualify what you mean. I stand with the Ukrainian people who have been displaced and killed by the war, but I also stand with the Ukrainians in the Donbass region who have been discriminated against, massacred, and attacked by the NAZI element in the Ukrainian army that many like to overlook when it comes to this war.
I don't stand with Putin, but I stand with the poor people of Ukraine who will be indebted to US and international banks like the IMF for decades to come for all the weapons poured into the country, only to be mostly destroyed on delivery by the Russians.
Of course, the most powerful country on earth is only too happy to help anyone out in a war, especially against an enemy of their own, even more so if it means that their own weapons companies get paid, and countries are indebted for decades due to their "help".
I don't want to be involved in the West's proxy war with Russia, where they want to fight to the last Ukrainian, not helping those left to rot in the Azovstal factories, as US and UK politicians debate their next attack on Russia.
If it was left to Ukraine, with no western interference, then the peace talks which the Russians started at the same time as their invasion would have concluded by now and there would be some sort of settlement. It is the west who is continuing the slaughter in Ukraine and no one should be in doubt of this fact.
I leave you with this video from the Redacted YouTube channel about the likelihood of this proxy war turning hot as the MIC makes a mint from the selling of weapons to Ukraine.
Please leave a comment and explain what you mean when you say that "You Stand With Ukraine".
Why Has The Left Gone So Crazy Over COVID In America?
By Dark Politricks
A very odd thing happened in the USA over the last 2 years and the COVID pandemic. The left, liberal, and mostly Democratic voters have gone mad over the response from some to COVID.
For liberals you would expect them to respect bodily autonomy, and question Government motives, especially a Government that has been so fully captured by the Big Pharma companies.
Companiesthat aremaking money from the push to get more and more people vaccinated or have more have booster shots.
What is going on in the left-wing in America for so many supposed liberals to think this way?
Currently, as in the UK, Denmark, Sweden, and Spain, much of Europe is opening up from their lockdowns and declaring "their war on COVID over".
Despite the continued high numbers of people contracting the virus, they are now more concentrated on the no of hospitalizations and deaths, from people with COVID, not people who were admitted with something else who then caught COVID in their hospital.
We only have to look at the UK last year when they declared that "no one had caught the annual winter flu", to know that some form of miss-counting was going on. For example, at the moment, we are only having 3 cases per 100,000 people for a virus that usually affects between 10,000 and 25,000 people every winter.
They claimed the same measures enacted to defeat the spread of COVID (that were not working), e.g wearing a mask, socially distancing, working from home, and lockdowns, were also the same reasons why the spread of flu was not occurring.
Now how the same measures that were preventing one virus, were also causing another one to have record contraction figures, I don't know, however, this is what the UK Government was claiming in 2021, and is now claiming in 2022.
Now I would love to know how many people who actually did have the flu, were actually misdiagnosed as COVID, but I doubt those figures exist. However, one thing is known for sure the COVID testing kits were not perfect.
We do know that the figures were massaged with people who had contracted the virus and then tested negative for it and then died from any other cause within 28 days, being put down as a COVID death.
Why the Government wanted to inflate death numbers in this way is up for discussion but it leaves a nasty taste in the mouth of people who may have been told their relative died from the virus when really their death had really been caused by being hit by a car or falling from a ladder.
Did the UK Government want to inflate the numbers to justify extreme lockdown measures through fear, one could legitimately ask?
Whilst the Democrats in the USA are still are pushing for everyone they can to get vaccinated, it seems that Europe is quietly dropping that idea due to the amount of much-needed staff who are still unvaccinated, which would leave a huge empty hole in the workforce.
In the UK they have dropped the mandate as they calculated that almost 80,000 healthcare workers could be forced out of their jobs because they had declined to take two doses of a COVID vaccine.
Why is it so many doctors and nurses don't want to or haven't yet been vaccinated?
Do they know something the rest of us don't, have they better health knowledge and experience to make up their own minds on what protection against COVID they require?
I know that many nurses had already caught and survived COVID from the early era before vaccines. For anybody who has been listening, a natural immunity from having COVID is at least as good, if not better protection from getting the disease again.
Of course in this heated politicised pandemic, when one study like that comes out, there is a rush by Big Pharma and the co-opted MSM, who are literally sponsored by them, to rush out studies that refute such claims.
What is clear is that when we have a political environment where US politicians receive more money from Big Pharma lobbyists than the MIC, and that nearly every segment on the not so independent, US Media, is sponsored by a pharmaceutical company. There is a deeply vested interest in keeping their narrative alive and rubbishing any contradictory advice.
As Amazon and all the Big Box stores were allowed to stay open as small companies closed in their thousands, many not able to re-open. Big tech companies supplied online tools that allowed workers to not leave home to be in the office, and entertainment companies made a mint, for those stuck in their apartments with nothing to do but watch TV.
However, instead of letting qualified people have a civilized debate about the merits and pitfalls of rushed-out leaky vaccines and multiple booster shots versus other drugs and a limited lockdown for those most at risk. The US MSM seemed to go mental with anyone daring to disagree that only getting vaccinated was the cure to the pandemic.
Instead of letting the US economy carry on running and not forcing millions of workers to lose their jobs, and their job tied health insurance which leads only to massive hospital debts, homelessness, and the now big buy-up of housing by Wall St.
It has been clear to many that we are being served a load of Government and Big-Pharma pushed propaganda lies that there is only a single way out of this mess.
The Joe Rogan case, which I wrote about at the time when he got COVID, is still rolling on due to his apparent spread of "COVID misinformation". This is due to him daring to interview those "fringe" epidemiologists and giving them a voice that they were not allowed due to big tech censorship.
If Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are going to kick people off for falsely claiming that the vaccine is the only way out of the pandemic, then why shouldn't he allow these people to explain why they think the way they do?
Moderna’s two-dose COVID-19 vaccine, measured as 89% effective in March, was only 58% effective.
Pfizer and BioNTech, which also employed two doses, fell from 87% to 45% in the same period.
And most strikingly, the protective power of Johnson & Johnson's single-dose vaccine plunged from 86% to just 13% over six months.
If that is not something to be concerned about and discussed openly I don't know what is.
Why would liberals and Democrats want to hide these figures if it was not down to a profit motive?
We know that the people linked to making the virus e.g Dr. Fauci, the Lord and Saviour himself, has a vested interest along with the non medically trained but treated as such Bill Gates in vaccine patents.
Bill Gates and Dr Fauci both have very dark pasts and it's very easy to find out their histories if one just researches the various US and African vaccine studies with which Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates have been involved.
In a recent interview with James Corbett, another victim of Cancel Culture at YouTube for speaking his own mind but doing meticulous research. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who has a book out called "The Real Anthony Fauci" spoke about how the financial links between the federal health agencies and the pharmaceutical companies are unlike any other federal regulatory regime.
The metrics used within these agencies to measure whether or not an employee will get promoted, advanced, or get a salary raise revolve almost entirely around how well the employee promotes vaccine uptake.
“[These] people do not get rewarded for finding problems with vaccines — they get rewarded for covering up problems with vaccines … and some of the agencies directly profit from vaccine sales,” Kennedy said.
“For example, the [National Institutes of Health] owns thousands of medical patents, including half of the patent for the Moderna vaccine,” Kennedy said. “So Tony Fauci’s agency stands to make billions and billions of dollars. And Fauci was able to choose four of his high-level employees who each get their own individual patent shares and who’ll collect $150,000 per year for life.”
It was big business as usual getting its own way when we could have been a beacon to the Capitalist world and allowed our vaccine to be made for free and helped millions of people around the world who have had trouble getting access to vaccines, instead of making millions, for the already super-rich Bill Gates.
However, I do think it strange that Bill's foundation has got richer over the years when they were supposed to be giving their money away with free vaccines to poor countries. I don't really understand how a philanthropist gets richer through his supposedly charitable work when he should be spending his money on helping people, isn't that the supposed purpose of real charitable foundations?
So as Israel is on their 4th jab with people still getting infected it is plainly clear that the repeated claim that the "Vaccine was the only way out of the lockdown", was a lie, and one that was repeated over and over, despite people who had been fully vaccinated catching the virus, sometimes multiple times.
In the US, the politicisation of the pandemic was very clear, whilst the left and supposed defenders of liberal ideas such as the right to choose what to do with their bodies e.g abortion, and freedom of speech, they were acting very unliberal when screaming for people to be banned from social media if they detracted from the Government line, refused mandated vaccines or even talked about other therapeutics.
This was clearly seen in the CNN slander of Joe Rogan, and the Twitter display of glee when he caught the virus was appalling. Had they all forgotten what it meant to be a liberal?
It seemed that anyone who didn't follow the "vaccine is the way out of the lockdowns" line, was a red-neck conspiracy theorist who wanted to take animal drugs to cure themselves. The fact that these drugs were used successfully by Joe Rogan and some of his friends, to large parts of India, seems to refute their claims.
Also, it is plainly clear that the vaccines were not the way out of the pandemic, as nearly all western made vaccines were useless in stopping people from catching and spreading the virus, and even from getting hospitalised from it.
This must come as a shot to the head of team blue in the US who still want everyone vaccinated despite the leaky vaccines and loss of efficacy and the high rates of infection amongst vaccinated people.
These are people who all followed Government guidelines, self-isolated, socially distanced, worked from home, and wore masks everywhere.
If this pandemic had not been politicised so much, and the Governments of the world had not been so fully captured by Big Pharma, then maybe, just maybe, we could have had a civilized debate about the best way forward.
This could have been done without Dr Fauci and the NIH smearing those who swayed from his position, and the media that labels every protest an "anti-vaxxer" protest when most people at them have been vaccinated and they are only demonstrating against the mandates to chose between an unwanted medical procedure and their job.
A Washington "Anti-Mandate" protest - or for the MSM, an "anti-vaxxer" protest.
What has happened to the left?
They are so keen on being able to choose what to do with their body when it comes to abortion but during this pandemic, they have been demanding all over the news and social media that the unvaccinated should either be forced to get vaccinated, lose benefits, and even their jobs and homes if they didn't.
Now we find that almost a majority of Democratic supporters are now actually demanding thatthe unvaccinated be locked up in internment camps. Is this a liberal way of thinking, or the thoughts of someone brainwashed by mainstream news and Government propaganda?
No wonder every major news show is out ratioed by millions when it comes to the MSM versus Joe Rogan, at least Joe is willing to provide an alternative point of view, one that is never heard on CNN or MSNBC. He can count on 6 million+ people to listen to his every podcast, oh how the MSM wished they could get those numbers and it seems they are trying to defeat him the only way they know how, by trying to get him kicked off Spotify.
Not a very liberal act to try and deny someone the right to free speech is it?
It is a far cry from what I expected from liberals and now they have opened the door to social media accounts of those who disagree with Government guidelines to be kicked off Twitter and Facebook, often acting gleeful when it occurs.
I only hope they soon change their minds and regret their actions, for when it is they who are on the wrong side of the Government and Big Tech and are being cancelled, who do they expect to call for help?
What was that saying... "first they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a socialist......." ... or maybe...."first they came for the unvaccinated and I did not speak out as I was on my 4th booster...."
Also please go to Change.org and sign the petition asking Dr. Fauci to debate other scientists on the merits of vaccinating children, lockdowns, natural immunity, and health agencies interfering in the doctor-patient relationship e.g forced vaccinations.
Where Americans in America reporting on American news get called "Foreign Agents".
They call it Russian state news, despite everyone and the studio being in the US and reporting on American issues not Russian ones.
I suppose it's just the same as MSNBC, NBC, CNN, FOX who are really state mouthpieces due to all the CIA agents working with them who come on their shows to push the establishment move for more war.
Operations COINTELPRO and OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD are CIA programs still in use to this day to feed viewers fake or one sided news, never tell the real story about how many people they are killing and keep the people dumb to what the US is really doing to countries in this world.
This includes illegal wars, coups, breaking international law, propping up dictators, training death squads at the School of the Americas or just standard arming of our supposed enemies like Al-Qaeda and ISIS instead of fighting them alongside the Russians to get rid of them.
So really if you want real news about the USA you have to look at other countries news coverage about the country as the big networks are all owned by the MIC and will support US troops in any war at any time even if it's wrong and illegal.
You might have been told that RT.com is all Russian propaganda but it's the sort of REAL JOURNALISM that should be done by CNN MSNBC, FOX etc.
It looks at events MSNBC or FOX never cover such as the massive genocide the US is currently engaged in in Yemen with the Saudi's.
It looks at the illegal wars most people don't even realise the US is fighting with men on the ground and drones in Africa.
It looks at the Industrial Prison Complex set up to use prisoners as slaves and their recent strike as well the usual Military Industrial Complex lobbying for more war and how stupid it is.
Trump sold the Saudi's all those billion dollars worth of weapons so they might as well use them to attack the poorest nation on Earth and kill kids with Cholera due to a national epidemic and health crisis that has come from the war.
Really if that 9.11 report was real and those 29 pages were accepted as real by the US government why didn't the US attack Saudi Arabia?
The whole population would be demanding that the US go to war with Saudi Arabia. Instead we help them commit a genocide and sell them weapons to be passed on to the Jihadists in Syria.
It is time to admit, if you haven't already, that we are on the WRONG side of the right line in current national affairs.
Did your favourite MSM news station tell you about the massive war games in Russia with Chinese troops alongside that will be ending on the last day of the supposed "Peace Conference" over Syria.
300,000 Russian troops and weapons, using live fire, all on the move, using battle experienced troops on terrain similar to Syria.
This is like a whole city moving around and there is talk that tactical nukes might be moved to Syria if the US doesn't pay heed to the new Russian weapon systems including combat suits that are flame resistant and their drone anti aircraft missiles that the US tried to buy and the Russian's said no and sold them to China instead. Don't forget their state of the art anti aircraft systems as well.
A Russian General called it necessary and our last chance.
I guess they are hoping to show the West that they are ready for a fight and hopefully scare them off, otherwise they are ready to go toe to toe with us.
Did MSNBC mention any of that on last nights news?
Well don't worry, this is why you should follow alternative news instead e.g #altnews. Redacted Tonight is a good place to start, as it uses satire and humour to help you wash down the distasteful new US atrocities committed in your name without your knowledge.
This week the Redacted News team take a look at how easy it is to hack a modern day US voting machine to flip votes. Only 1 minute required to flip the whole lot with direct access.
They also cover how Jeff Bezos, the richest living man in the world, could easily solve world hunger, give everyone clean drinking water, pay for health care and still have millions left in his pocket.
He is so deep in with the CIA and owns the Washington Post that whilst Amazon destroys local shopping centres, he could be saving the world.
View the video about "Where Americans should come to get REAL news about their country and how criminal it is" at YouTube.
This video is worth watching if you are still getting mad about #Russiagate, thinking Russia was hacking into machines and trying to fix the US election.
Trump may have got information from the Russians but Clinton got her foreign information from Ukraine through a middle man - ex UK spy - who got it from ...... Russia.
So if there is going to be an investigation on Trump and Russia, then there should be one on Hillary and her own dossier, her failure to hand over private "hacked" servers to the FBI, and their excuse for losing to Trump on Russia and a push for WWIII .
,WWIII
This is all over a #NothingBurger and #RussiaGate, something even MSM news watchers are getting tired of.
I will let Kyle tell the story for you and watch the CNN host get stunned by calls from his viewers about his constant going on about Russia just so the Democrats don't have to analyse their last election and where they went wrong.
They went wrong by not including progressive ideas and just attacking Trump. The leaked DNC emails showed they were corrupt for giving Hilary front row, smearing Bernie, and keeping all the money for her to spend on the election.
How did that work without Bernies policies and more of free Medicare, free University, less war, more jobs and a crack down on Wall St. The party lost millions of supporters as well as politicians and it will be hard to get them back if all they talk about is Russia.
All this could have been paid for by the trillion dollars of debt that Trump has already added to the national debt with help from the Democrats when they all voted for him to have his $800 billion for the military and his "wall" with Mexico.
A few closures of foreign military bases as well which are well overdue such as in the UK, Germany and other spots not geo-politically placed to surround Russia or China.
Watch and learn.
So even CNN hosts are shocked when their callers ring in and complaining that they don't care about his spiel on #Russiagate. He does it just to keep his company owners and advertisers happy, and of course blame President Trump on Russia and being Putins puppet, NOT the fact that the Democrats put the most hated politician in the country up against him.
The Democrats need some real policies.
In fact the "dove" party is driving the country towards a war with Russia and all over stupid Russian Facebook adverts and a few meetings that were bugged illegally through FISA court warrants obtained by using leaked info to Yahoo to back them up.
So it's a video worth watching seeing that the "left" (who are now right wing) are pushing for war, and calling for Trump to "defend the country". There were even people on Chis Hayes show who claimed it was just as bad as Pearl Harbour and 9.11, that is apart from no-one died and we got a numpty for President instead of a career politician who wants war with Russia.
Lee Camp explains that lying to kids about Santa Clause and then indoctrinatisets the stage for large-scale societal acceng them into the lie when they're older
Correspondent John F. O’Donnell joins Lee at the desk to discuss the recent fate of the EPA and correspondent Natalie McGill shows how our veterans are disrespected via sub par medical care.
Watch Mainstream Media Recognises False Flags, UFOs, Massive Inequality & More! On YouTube at Redacted Tonight.
Do you have to be a dead journalist nowadays to be considered a real one?
By Dark Politricks
It seems that 2013 has been the year that the Empire finally threw away any semblance of liberty and free speech and decided to go for broke in its attack on all those who dare speak truth to power. They sure have been cranking the screws on anyone who speaks out against them in the last few months.
Once again this is another abuse of this law by the UK government. However this is to be expected as the UK government doesn't exactly have a good record on it's implentation.
Plus our new anti terrorism acts (2000 and 2006) have been used to detain arrestees for up to 28 days without charge, restricted the right to protest and limited free speech in many areas all whilst giving our police new powers to stop and search people they think "could be" terrorists. These groups mainly consist of people who take photographs of policemen or London landmarks, or it seems the partners of journalists breaking stories on illegal surveillance by the state.
It seems the UK's implementation of anti terrorism laws has been used more to chill dissent and increase the polices power to abuse due process rather than to attack true terrorists. How hypocritical it is that we attack whistleblowers and journalists whilst fund and support al-Nusra Front jihadists and al-Qaeda linked LIFG rebels in our game of chess in the Middle East.
It shames me to be a Brit when we suck up to the USA in this way.
It seems we are so desperate for American money to keep the cogs running in our GCHQ super computers that we will bend over backwards anyway possible to help the US attack their own "domestic extremists".
We will do anything from detaining and robbing the partners of reporters who break stories on massive NSA surveillance or manning a 24 siege of the building in which another whistleblower is hiding out.
I wouldn't be surprised if I woke up tomorrow and heard on the news that David Cameron had authorised a drone strike on the Ecuadorian embassy and killed Julian Assange.
Again the Terrorism Act from 2000 was used to detain Glenn Greenwalds partner, a dubious use of the law at the very least and one which Glenn promises revenge on the UK government. I don't doubt he has many more secrets about the cosy affair between GCHQ and the NSA to reveal but he surely must be worried about the climate which now surrounds any journalist willing to go head to head with the beast.
Would the USA stoop to such levels as to actually dispatch with pesky journalists who reveal state secrets from whistleblowers?
Some people already believe this has been the case for years.
Recently we had the mysterious death of Michael Hastings who died in a mysterious car crash after going on the run due to fears he had about a story he was working on.
Apparently top US Army officials told the Rolling Stone journalist that he would be hunted down and killed over his story that lead to General McChrystal’s downfall and he was apparently working on a massive story concerning the CIA. This was all before he warned friends he had to go off the radar due to worries about his safety and then surprisingly his car exploded in an unusual accident.
With recent revelations that DARPA or anyone else with the skills can hack into computers on board cars nowadays it doesn't seem so far-fetched to believe he was taken out by some agency annoyed with his work. With computers controlling everything from dishwashers to cars and with NSA/GCHQ super computers able to pinpoint phones and GPS co-ordinates in real-time it wouldn't take a genius in this day and age with the right software to do some damage with a few keystrokes.
Got a webcam on your PC? Well just hope it's just your friends watching your pretty face from afar and not an NSA nerd or even your local school!
Gary Webb was the reporter who had famously broke the story about the CIA running guns to the Contra's and drugs back to the states. It was the CIA's coke that started the Los Angeles crack wars in the 80's and made a certain CIA owned drug dealer Ricky “Freeway Ricky” Ross very rich. It was his story that led to the black community and the NAACP trying to get congressional hearings held into the allegations.
The Colombian drug dealers convicted of the crime believed they working for a certain Oliver North and the fingerprints that led to the Iran Contra scandal and Mena drug operation that link nearly everyone in the Bush family to Bill Clinton were all over the hit.
So it wouldn't be a total shock after the history of covert assassinations to hear on the news one day that Glenn Greenwald had been found dead along with his partner David. Probably after a heated argument overhead by an anonymous caller to the police. The official story would be that Glenn was found dead, supposedly having committed suicide after first killing his partner. Of course he would have shot himself three or four times in the head just to make sure of course.
Therefore if I was Glenn I would be slightly wary about waging all out war on the US/US axis of war. Of course he is well within his rights to do so and I wish he brings the whole house down if he possibly can, however it is clear he has been marked by the powers that be.
It seems a sad state of affairs when you cannot be considered a real journalist unless you are running in fear from the Government and their partners across the globe.
Is it really a choice between breaking a really major story such as the CIA drug smuggling, NSA spying, or US war crimes and then ending up dead, looking for asylum or locked up in a military prison for years?
All the while talking heads get paid millions just to parrot official stories and take the Governments word on everything. It must be hard to look in the mirror when you call yourself a journalist but don't dare put your head above the parapet.
"Everything's ok, just keep shopping", they say as the world burns and the constitution continues to be shredded piece by piece.
What a choice it has become. To be paid millions for toeing the line and having no moral fibre at all, or dare speak truth to power and risk two in the head or a life on the run.