Is There A Leak In The Intelligence Services Or Does The Deep State Just Want Trump Dead?
By Dark Politricks
After the second assassination attempt on Presidential candidate Donald Trump at the weekend by convicted felon, Ryan Routh, we must ask ourselves, is there a leak in the security services supposedly meant to protect Trump, or does the Deep State so entwined with the Democratic party just want to make sure he never reaches polling day and by using patsies and professionals trying to kill him anyway they can?
Three of these teams are supposedly foreign, and I don't doubt as neo-con, warmonger, Lindsey Graham has already claimed, that Iran is supposedly behind some of these teams. If he is actually assassinated I can see Israel ready to come out with some rock solid intelligence, which many in the US intelligence community considering Israeli intelligence to be worthless unless benefiting Israel itself.
As Israeli news reports itself, U.S. national security officials consider Israel to be a frustrating ally and a genuine counterintelligence threat with it being implicated in US criminal espionage cases. In fact don't take my words for it, let Haaretz the Israeli newspaper spell it out for you.
"The CIA considers Israel its No. 1 counterintelligence threat in the agency's Near East Division, the group that oversees spying across the Middle East, according to current and former officials. Counterintelligence is the art of protecting national secrets from spies. This means the CIA believes that U.S. national secrets are safer from other Middle Eastern governments than from Israel."
I am sure that with the recent talk from Trump about how this up coming US election is "Israels most important election ever", and how he would "Make Israel Great again" as well as being "Israels best friend". It seems that if Trump is elected then Israel is going to get a green light to do a lot of evil in the region with open US backing rather than the current situation of the US backing them but pretending they are giving the Israeli's stern telling offs over the phone after every atrocity they are committing.
The insinuation is clear, if Trump is elected then Israel is clear to do a lot of things it feels it can't at the moment due to international pressure. This will include the annexing of the West Bank, the banning of any criticism of Israels foreign or domestic policy including their genocide and Human rights abuses as they try to starve and slowly kill the Gazan population, and having the US back them in any larger conflict against Hezbollah and Iran which Israel is busy stoking up.
One can only assume they are ratcheting up the war with Hezbollah trying to goad Israel into attack so that once Trump is elected they get to draw the US into a wider war with Iran, once again using the deaths of US soldiers to further their own policy of total dominance over the Middle East. I wouldn't even be surprised due to Israels duplicity concerning the US, whether one of these 5 assassination teams in the US, are Israeli cut outs. They know that if Trump is killed and they can blame it on Iran that the US would go full out heavy metal jacket in the region and possibly start World War III.
The first attempt on Trumps life at a rally in Pennsylvania, was a mixture of security set up to fail, with many buildings, including the one that Crooks shot from outside the security perimeter and possibly other snipers which were there to do the job, letting Crooks play the patsy fall guy.
Plus there is all the strangeness around the shooting including
Allowing a man with a scope walk around suspiciously without stopping him as if he was meant to be noticed.
A perimeter set up with so many buildings opposite the stage Trump was on just yards away but outside it. There was more car parking space in the security perimeter than buildings it seems.
I admit that I have little knowledge of guns but have watched multiple videos from ex snipers, second amendment activists and sound analysts, and for me I am still not sure whether Crooks fired all the 8 shots into the crowd and the one that hit Trump.
It sounds as if the first 3 shots were fired with a pause between each shot, and then the next 5 come very fast as if not from the semi-automatic gun Crooks was using.
There is a 9th shot that the FBI and Secret Service denied occurring, maybe that was from a police officer sniper who was shooting at but missed Crooks. Or maybe it was from a professional Sniper there to take Trump out if the job hadn't been done.
Then there is a very long wait for the admitted kill shot on Crooks. In fact it takes another 10 seconds for the shot to kill Crooks to occur.
Whether the first 8 shots were all fired by Crooks or not, there is definitely a 9th shot before the long pause which is unexplained for counter snipers who must have seen and heard the shooting, noticed the crowd pointing at the roof Crooks was on and so on before shooting a kill shot.
Why did they wait so long to kill the assassin?
Were they waiting for another attempt by their own sniper to take another shot at Trump due to the failure of the first 8/9?
There are plenty of videos on Rumble that delve into the sound analysis of each shot, where the cartridges would have fallen, and what Crooks head should have looked like after being shot. You can find these easily.
However, for a cursory overview watch the first 15.5 minutes of this video for gunshot analysis and the debate over the missing 9th shot that the FBI won't admit to.
After the first assassination attempt Dan Bongino in a Senate testimony said there would be more attempts on Trumps life and was attacked as just being a crazy conspiracy theorist. A two word creation of the CIA to dismiss anyone with alternative views on the JFK assassination and dismissive of their "magic bullet" theory. This slur has been used so much a bit like anti-Semite since Oct 7th 2023 that it has lost all meaning.
People in power collude, especially when their interests align, and all a conspiracy means is a crime where two or more people are involved, thousands of conspiracy cases are tried in courts across the world yearly.
Now after this second attempt on Trumps life we, like Dan, must start asking whether there is a leak in the Secret Services due to the fact an out of town, Ukraine mad shooter, sat in the woods of a golf course for 12 hours in the hope of killing Trump when he reached that hole.
Apparently only a few people in the Secret Service would have known about the non publicised visit by Trump and his billionaire friend to the golf course, although Piers Morgan believes it's a no brainer that when Trump is in Florida he plays golf there. However, Trump was in California before flying to Florida, so how did anyone know he would be going back to Florida in time to prepare this trap for him?
Although Dan tries to link the attempt to kill the ex President to Iranian threats and other state actors there could be other closer to home people who are desperate to kill the President. This is someone who has not fallen victim to earlier attempts to take him out of the Presidential race such as the numerous lawfare court cases, failed attempts to impeach him, and threats to ruin him by the intelligence services when leaving office if he dared pardon Julian Assange or Edward Snowden.
He didn't do those last two acts, but despite this the Deep State have come after him with everything they have got.
The NSA would have been able to intercept any Trump communications about plans to fly to Florida to go golfing, and Ryan Routh could have been notified about the golfing game in time for him to get to the course and plot up in the woods.
Whether he was or not will be hard to tell now as he has gone missing since that day, and his parents have filed a missing persons report and his phone has been off.
Routh would have definitely been on the CIA's watch list for travelling to Ukraine and trying to recruit people to fight out there. Before his social media was totally scrubbed which seems an odd thing to do especially on Twitter where you would expect Elon to allow people to read the postings of a suspect in such a case.
However, most of it was downloaded by #ALTNEWS reporters before it could be scrubbed and from this we could see his online connections to the CIA as his first ever people he followed worked there or were related to it. They even followed back which shows some sort of relationship between Routh and the intelligence services as well as his seemingly delusional obsession with Ukraine and getting people to come over to fight there.
The CIA certainly has a murky past with assassinations and who knows what MKULTRA like experiments they are getting away with in Ukraine outside the USA's jurisdiction. Routh could have become radicalised or brainwashed into a lone gunmen 60's style CIA hitmen for all we know.
We know that before Rouths social media was scrubbed people took data down from X that showed he followed particular CIA agents, and he was in Ukraine actually recruiting men to fight for the country war rather than the failed AZOV brigade worshipper kicked out for being mental we are being led to believe by the mainstream media.
Routh had a long criminal history with over 100 offences, many gun related, even one for possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Another similar charge was dropped despite it being related to being pulled over by cops whilst armed with a machine gun and barricading himself inside a building for three hours.
Routh eventually pleaded guilty to driving without a license and registration, resisting a public officer and carrying a concealed firearm, while the weapon of mass destruction charge was dropped. Routh's lengthy criminal record has only seen him being convicted in a handful of cases. Maybe someone high up was looking after him?
Whoever in the Deep State is behind these attempts on Trumps life I doubt we have heard the end of them and even if he wins the election, Democrats could pressure their DOJ bent judges to incarcerate him for one of the felony charges he faces. It would definitely be hard for Trump to be POTUS from behind bars but apparently not illegal under US law.
It would definitely be seen as sour grapes by a Democratic party that crows about Jan 6th and election result denials, totally forgetting totally how in 2016 they invented a tale of pee parties in Russian hotels and Russian hacking to account for Hillary Clinton's loss against Trump. Someone she actually urged to run for President thinking he would be easier to beat.
So there are many angles to see these attempts on Trumps life but the obvious links between both suspects (and the doppelganger Maxwell Yearick) and the two intelligence agencies known for both assassinations and creating crimes from under cover officers and unwitting victims as well as the invasion of privacy through dubious methods is something that we need to look at carefully.
One thing is certain. The left leaning MSM in the USA will try and blame Trump for this assassination attempt as many news shows already have, and if it's still in their news cycle and not memory holed within a fortnight I will be shocked,
You can watch Dan Bonjino break down his theories of leaks within the Secret Service below.
The new priests in the 4th industrial revolution are the big tech companies that control the information age. We are no longer allowed to make our own minds up about a subject or whether or not to take medical procedures, the big tech companies will stomp out any view that doesn't reflect the establishment views.
With Facebook supporting the Democrats by almost $500 million, and Google being funded and helping the CIA, we are now living in a world where the establishments views must conform to the political agenda of the elite.
With outspoken views being wiped off the web, and the de-ranking or cancelling of our free speech on the tech companies that have become the public speaking squares. The new high priests are back.
This video by the excellent political and UFO researcher Richard Dolan is all about the new priest hood.
Our current global revolution seeks to undo the last 500 years of individual autonomy and freedom of conscience. Those were prizes we have had since the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment.
Now our digital world is dominated by the new priests i.e: Big Tech corporations who are here to permit or deny information to you (and from you) as they see fit. The plan is not simply to take away your autonomy but to deny you even the right to it. And this is not separated from the reality of the UFO/UAP phenomenon. No, it has powerful connections to it.
For the home of exclusive content from author, historian, and radio host Richard Dolan. Join his member site here: http://richarddolanmembers.com/
UK Government Using COVID as Cover To Create Police State
By Dark Politricks
The UK is turning into a Police State before our eyes, that is, if you are watching and listening to the right news and not consumed by talk about COVID.
It's as if the Tory government is letting the dilly dallying over COVID rules lockdowns and passports consume everyone's thoughts, all whilst they implement some of the most draconian laws we have ever seen.
Forced detention and isolation can be of anyone, including children, and for any amount of time.
Authorities can FORCEABLY take biological samples from your body.
There’s no clear access to legal rights from as-yet unidentified isolation facilities.
Powers last up to 2.5 years...why so long?
Lockdown powers could prevent protests against measures.
State surveillance safeguards weakened.
Protections from forced detainment and treatment under Mental Health Act lowered.
Cremations can be enforced against personal and religious wishes.
Changes to the court system. Registration of deaths.
No inquests into suspicious deaths! No requirement for any medical certification for burials or cremations!
It also indemnifies the health service should they fail for what ever reason to provide care.
The most frightening part is only one medical 'officer' is required to sign off on a "COMPULSORY TREATMENT ORDER" which means... in the real world you can be forced to accept medication or held down and injected with whatever is seen fit which is the biggest and worst threat to your own freedoms. Schedule 8 Pt1.
Local Authorities will now be exempted from compliance with their duties under The Care Act 2014. Schedule 11.
So if someone dies in police custody or any type of custody they can simply dispose of the body without any paperwork medical exam or certification or inquest.
Sounds like a Police State already doesn't it, and I wonder how many people will be noticing to see if this law is removed like the Tories said it would 2 years after it went onto the law books. However as the new Police Bill prevents people protesting if they are too noisy then maybe we won't even have a chance to protest against the extension of the UK police state.
How many of you read about all the protests going on over Europe at the moment against their restriction of movement?
It is quite clear a lot of people do not like lockdowns and the threat of fines or jail for breaking them. However how many people have read about these massive protests in London or seen anything about them on the news in the UK. I haven't and no-one I ask has as well. There are a few articles if you search Google but they all come at the protests from a "Speaking to a conspiracy theorist at a protest" angle. So the mainstream media are obviously taking these protests seriously.
Soon however these protests will be crushed by the Police due to the new Police Bill that will prevent protests that are too noisy.
I think this protest at Trafalgar Square might come under the noisy part.
Restrictions on protests in the controversial new policing bill breach human rights laws and will increase the risk of peaceful demonstrators in England and Wales being criminalised, MPs and peers have warned.
They say the police, crime, sentencing and courts (PCSC) bill, which has provoked widespread protests, contains provisions that are unnecessary and disproportionate and confer unacceptably wide and vague powers to curb demonstrations on the home secretary and police.
They are keeping the uprising against the new UK Police State as quiet as possible. The original video was taken down at YouTube so I found a video on BitChute about the London Protests against Lockdowns, and anti-tyranny Police State measures being brought forward in the UK that would ban such protests like these for being too noisy > https://www.bitchute.com/video/GRskh0SZ3ABv/
However you can watch this video from The Duran about the Tories new Official Secrets Act. It is supposed to be to prosecute spies, but it is being modelled on the US version, but worse, and it is aimed at not just papers but anyone, including maybe me, for passing on information from whistle-blowers about illegal acts that the UK may have committed.
This can range from things I have already reported on over the years including something mentioned in the video below such as:
So from what is spoken about in this video about the new law, will it just affect papers and if so why are they not writing about the dangers of it?
Or is it aimed more at bloggers and people like Julian Assange so that the UK can lock people up who question or repeat whistle-blowers information about UK secrets, without a public interest defence.
From the Duran,Boris Johnson launches a new Secrets Act to imprison Journalists who dare question the government.
Official Secrets Act: Boris Johnson 'Doesn't Want' Journos Prosecuted for 'Doing Their Public Duty'
It looks like to me, that the UK is turning into a real police state and this is just the thin edge of the wedge, that even Church leaders have come out to speak against in the UK.
I guess if you are not reading #Altnews you will not even know about any of this, but if you are you should be very worried.
Even posting on Facebook or Twitter might land you in jail depending on the wording of the bill.
Anything that exposes UK Foreign Policy crimes, intelligence agencies doing wrong doings, or war crimes could land you in jail for the rest of your life.
Now does that sound like a free speech democracy?
Just don't expect anyone to come and protest for your innocence, the police will ban that for being too noisy straight away.
How Life Before COVID19 Will Never Return To Normal...
By Dark Politricks
This is an interesting video from Richard Dolan. Since the pandemic started I have been saying that we won't be going back to a life anywhere near normal, even if all the mutated versions of the virus are all squashed somehow.
Not everyone WILL or WILL BE ALLOWED to get the vaccine anyway, so don't expect that to stop the spread of the virus. I saw a doctor swab a piece of fruit with the COVID19 test the other day and it turn positive so I have little faith in rushed out medical solutions.
I have thought for a long time that when AI became so good that it could create it's own simulated realities, that virtual reality would be the place that most of us "useless eaters" would survive and live. Only being able to socialise and meet partners of the opposite sex in a VR world because the globalists had turned the real world into China, using super AI computers to control our movements, our cash flow and our ability to meet up and travel anywhere.
You only have to look at China's social credit system to see how well they have been at creating a system to control over a billion people. It truly is a modern marvel - if you think that having your life controlled by computers is a marvel.
However they manage to keep most of their population in line with their social credit system and the rest, well they are working in slave labour camps, being "re-educated", or having their organs removed for rich elitists to purchase.
This is a video by Richard Dolan, whose own mother has just died due to COVID19 related problems. Therefore he is no "denier" of the disease but he does see how society has changed for the worse because of it and worries about our future life on this planet.
In it he talks about the 4th Industrial Revolution, the Great Reset, and how AI computers are so sophisticated nowadays that with only a few hours of being given the rules to the most complicated game on earth, GO, where there are more positions on the board than the known number of atoms in the observable universe, approximately 2.1 × 10170. The computer can easily beat the best human players of the game in the world, and even the best AI computer built to beat the best human Chess players on the planet.
With AI computers as sophisticated as this, who can learn, and then teach themselves with calculations of millions of processes per second, can you really believe the authorities would not want to use such creations in their control of humanity?
Just remember if you believe the Government is there to help you then you don't know history.
Have a watch and think to yourself if you can honestly say that at the end of this year you will all be celebrating Christmas with your families, and drinking down the pubs with your mates as you did in 2019. I don't.
China's Social Credit Score - What is more important your friends or your phone?
By Dark Politricks
If we look at China we can see into our own future.
China has been a model and testing ground for our own Orwellian State since Mao conducted his great leap forward, praised by leaders in the west such as David Rockefeller, despite the 60+ million or so who died as a consequence of this change.
Why do Western leaders look to an authoritarian Communist country such as China, for ideas for their own countries to implement?
Well it keeps it a secret from most people in Europe and America, as most don't read or watch videos from articles on blogs that report on Chinese news. They get their information from papers owned by the rich and powerful, people who would benefit from similar systems, if implemented in their own countries.
China is a perfect place to test new algorithms to downgrade certain web content, build internet firewalls, and create new automatic systems of reward and punishment such as their new Social Credit Score system. This new system will automatically rate every person in the country with a number depending on how well you behave, the goods that you buy, the places you visit and even the friends you associate with.
It will actually warn people when they make phone calls to people with a low social credit score and even punish you for associating with them. It will even take points off your own credit score if you are seen to be friends with people with low scores. Faces automatically plastered on electronic billboards when someone jaywalks for other people to see, all so they can be instantly judged by their fellow citizens.
People with good social credit scores are rewarded with trophies, the opportunity to travel, send their children to good schools and have better housing. They even get to have their faces posted in the papers or on the electronic screens on street walls that are as common as the CCTV cameras that watch everyone.
It is a massive automatic feedback loop. Every action taken by someone is captured and analysed, before the system reacts and decides if it is acceptable for the good of society. Once decided it adds or deducts points from your score. It is just like traveling the web with tracking cookies that log the content you visit before showing you adverts specifically tailored for your tastes.
If you think that it can't happen in your own country you only need to read up on NSA systems such as TRAPWIRE that the USA already uses, and the GCHQ in the UK. A country with more CCTV cameras per capita than anywhere else. A country that the Americans test their intrusive systems out first, without complaint from our Government, all due to our lack of a proper bill of rights.
The system is based on all the connected videos captured by thousands of CCTV cameras that record us everywhere we travel before storing them in huge data centres such as the city sized underground data centre in UTAH. The next step is to use already existing technology to analyse this huge pool of data and decide whether actions captured are good or bad before updating a citizens score.
Think of the popular TV show Person of Interest before realising that it is actually happening now in China and soon in your own country.
People with low social credit scores are basically pariahs in China.
They have their low scores flashed to people's phones nearby using geo-location technology, so that they can basically spy on them. People can even gain points for their own credit score by informing on another persons actions. Just making a phone call to someone with a low score can prompt a warning message on the receivers phone so they can decide whether they want to risk losing points by answering it.
These people are prevented from traveling outside the country, buying certain items or applying for certain jobs. They even have their own rankings on dating websites demoted as they are deemed unsuitable mates by the "system".
It is almost as if we are handing our own governance over to a massive computer with the only human input required being the rules of what is good and bad and the bio-metrics of every citizen. Once inputted your face becomes your ID, required for access to the internet, a password for banking, and a symbol of what your country deems acceptable behaviour.
Drive too fast in a 30mph zone and the cameras capture your image before automatically deducting money from your bank account as a fine.
Cash is unacceptable as we are seeing already with Scandinavian countries trying to ban it and fewer and fewer people using it. More and more people prefer to pay at shops with a swipe of a debit card or phone at the till. All your shopping items are logged, ready to be sifted through by computers to decide whether you are eating and drinking the right food.
Who and what is more important?
Your choice to go to the pub with certain people or your chance to buy the latest iPhone and buy train tickets to travel to different cities?
I bet many people now are thinking, no never would I disassociate myself from my best friends, but when those friends don't or cannot pay automatic fines, or buy certain goods that the system deems as bad decisions giving them a low credit score, I think many will soon change their minds.
I like Brother Nathanael, as a non Zionist, ex Jew converted to Christianity, he calls Israel and Mossad out for all the things that they are doing to stir the wars up around the world.
Therefore when he criticizes Israel and their foreign policy you should listen to him. He isn't being forced to tell the "official line" or lies about what is going on. He tells it as it is, so believe him or not, you should still listen to him.
Brother Nathanael discusses why Turkey, the supporter of DAESH, shot down the Russian jet
Brother Nathanael discusses the real reasons why Turkey shot down the Russian jet that was bombing the snake of oil trucks sliding its way to Turkey for the Turks to buy, and therefore funding Daesh and other jihadists that they are supposed to be fighting.
Brother Nathanael discusses the Paris terrorist attacks and Mossad's involvement in them
I have been saying for ages now on this site and social media how odd it is that DAESH or ISIL/ISIS has not been concerned with Israel but more with Christians and other Muslims.
Unlike other terrorist groups who blame their hatred on the west for our support of the Zionist and increasingly racist state of Israel, not much has come out of the mouths of DAESH.
This is the most well funded, best armed and manned terrorist army ever know to man and they are right on Israel's border in Syria.
Despite this Israel seems more concerned with kids throwing stones at Israeli tanks before blasting them to bits in Gaza and the West Bank than DAESH, the well armed terrorist monster right beside them - why?
Well watch this video by Brother Nathaniel and you might get some clues to Mossad's involvement in the creation and existence of DAESH.
What is unsurprising to me but may shock others is that Mossad has apparently infiltrated DAESH at the highest places, even pretending to be Inmans and then ordering terrorist attacks that benefit the Jewish state.
If this is true then this surely another sign that they were probably doing the same with al-Qaeda and I have reported on Mossad creating fake al-Qaeda cells many times before. This also lends even more credence to the Mossad 9.11 false flag attack theory.
This is based around the fact that more Jews than Muslims (probably all known Mossad agents in the country), were arrested in the days after 9.11.
They were kept for a long time and then deported. Why? What questions were they asked and why were they arrested in the first place? Who got them released and why were they held so long? All questions I would love to know the answers to.
A truck driven by a Mossad linked company with the same type of bolt cutters that the terrorists apparently used on the hijacked planes was found in New York by Police who thought they were about to carry out another terrorist attack and the Mossad agents who were arrested filming the attacks across the river and admitted on Israeli TV that they were sent to "document the event".
Watch it here if you have not seen it before.
Oh and that doesn't even mention half of the other links including the fact that Mossad were apparently following these 9.11 hijackers around the US for months before hand, even living doors away from some of them.
So to hear that Mossad is once again fighting "By Way of Deception", is no surprise, and it perfectly explains why ISIS is not even bothered about Israel.
Remember the ex Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky (another self hating Jew - there is quite a lot of them it seems) claimed that Israel's plan was to get the US and their western allies to do all their dirty work for them.
They successfully tricked the Americans into bombing Libya in the 80's, then planned to get the US to get rid of Saddam Hussein (then a US ally against Iran), and finally President Assad in Syria.
It seems all their plans have almost come to fruition until the appearance of Russia helping to defend the Assad regime.
ISIS or "Islamic State" as they call themselves, is as barbaric a group as they come. However the misnomer of the term Islamic State is being used to justify attacks on all Muslims whether they are fundamentalists or moderates.
Not all Muslims are the same just as not all Christians or Jews are. The same goes for Atheists, Buddhists and any other group of people on this planet whether the Daily Mail tells you differently or not.
Whilst ISIS may believe they are an Islamic State or a new Caliphate for the 21st century. Other Islamic States such as Iran and Saudi Arabia are fighting or preparing to fight against them.
Not all Islamic States are the same either whether they put that title in their countries name or not.
There have been many Islamic Caliphates ( Islamic Governments ) throughout history and as with most religions the concept itself is split on tribal lines with Sunnis believing that the leader of any Caliphate should be elected by the Muslim people themselves whilst the Shia's believe that only a direct descendant from Muhammad's family can call himself a leader.
History shows that Islamic Governments who ruled from the Middle East to Europe, North Africa and at one point encompassing half of Spain, had at times more welcoming views to other religions than even the Christian Empires of the time. They allowed Jews and Christians to live amongst them and society was pluralistic as it could be under the circumstances of the age. Not all empires were welcoming but during the "golden age" of Islam the leaders of their lands did nothing to harm people of different belief systems living amongst them.
At one point the Umayyad Caliphate covered 5.17 million square miles, making it the largest empire the world had yet seen, and the fifth-largest ever to exist in history. The Ottoman Empire was Islamic in nature and trade, science and culture flourished throughout Islamic States at various points.
It was never the home to such people as those now calling themselves the new Islamic Caliphate.
However ISIS, just like the Taliban with their fundamentalist nature,believe in a strict interpretation of the Koran, and therefore ban music, dancing, and many modern items which seems to contradict directly their love of social media as a tool to spread their message on YouTube and Facebook. Most importantly pictures of the prophet are banned 100%. We have all witnessed the attacks on journalists who print cartoons of him, and it seems to be the ultimate insult that one can take to many Muslims around the world.
It seems as if these people believe the 7th century was the end of all human advancement in Culture, Science and Ethics.
Most importantly this group of people believe that it is okay to kill any human, whether woman, child or OAP, Christian or Muslim, who doesn't believe in their cruel barbaric form of governance.
You may have seen all the videos, accompanied by beautiful Islamic music, as people in cars film themselves doing drive by shootings on main roads in northern Iraq. Swerving back to ensure the occupants of any vehicle are killed fully and properly and any survivors of their attacks are filmed pleading for their lives before being shot in dug outs or cut to bits with knives and swords. They seem to think this indiscriminate slaughter is a propaganda tool for anyone witnessing it and they seem to be right as many young people flock to the Middle East to join their cause.
Even with all the numerous witnesses and dead victims appearing all over the place people, websites, news stations such as FOX and even forensic analysts are claiming that the recently heavily edited ISIS videos of Jihad John beheading captured journalists and aid workers, and even the burning alive of the captured Syrian pilot, are actually faked or staged.
Why ISIS would need to stage brutal killings when they have proven themselves to be sick murdering bastards by raping young girls and killing opponents by the truck load I don't know.
I have seen videos of whole convoys of trucks carrying captured Iraqi males being driven to a ditch where they are taken and shot. These are in no way heavily edited films and many are shot on phone cameras by the soldiers fighting for ISIS themselves.
However leaving aside any debate on fakery when it comes to beheadings, what I do know is that the rise of ISIS is a foreign policy error of the axis of war, and the US/UK's training and funding of "moderate" anti Assad groups like the Free Syrian Army have not helped one bit.
These groups have shown themselves to be just as barbaric as the rest of the groups fighting in Syria and any funding or training by Qatar, Saudi Arabia or the CIA have just helped to make ISIS into one of the most formidable terrorist groups in histpry.
We can all follow the trail of this conflict back to the "successful" overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya, a country which is now a mess and a huge training base for pro ISIS groups and then to Iraq and Afghanistan and 9.11.
From our intervention in Iraq, which was basically three countries held together by a Western backed dictator, to our war on the Taliban who only asked for some proof of Osama bin-Laden's guilt in the 9.11 attacks, before being denied it and bombed into Halliburton's pockets, the foreign policy decisions of our leaders have either been totally foolish or carefully planned to ensure we have a well equipped army to fight for the next few decades.
We can even go all the way back to the 1st World War and the Balfour Agreement which let Jews immigrate to Palestine in return for US help for Britain in the war, and then the carving up of captured Ottoman Empire holdings into countries that never existed such as Iraq.
Yes our foreign policy is immoral and imbalanced with support for dictators one moment when they serve our purposes and then their overthrow when they stop being useful. To be honest it did seem as if the Middle East was a whole lot calmer when Gaddafi and Hussein were in power.
To go back to the concept of a Caliphate, the whole area from Africa to Iraq and Afghanistan is tribal and localised in nature. These tribes have fought each other for centuries and it was only when their lands were controlled by Caliphate leaders, dictators, and leaders of Western Empire that they seemed to settle and stop their religious and tribal strife.
Take that firm grip away and the old rivalries return unabated.
Personally I have no love for any organised religion and whether it's the break up of the Roman Empire, Henry VIII leaving the Catholic Church and setting up the Church of England so he could get his leg over, or Protestants and Catholics fighting in Ireland, Christians cannot claim to be any less tribal when it comes to irrational belief systems.
One must also remember that Islam is the 3rd branch of the Abrahamic faith.
Please remember that the first books of the old Testament, which allow for the stoning to death of adulterers and other capital punishments for eating shellfish and other stupid laws were at one stage all carried out by Jews, Christians and Muslims.
The fact that Jews are now mostly atheists and Christians have followed their own testament based on the belief that Jesus was the Messiah doesn't take anything away from the core beliefs that all 3 religions once held, and the laws and punishments dealt out for breaking them.
The fact we are not criticising Islamic States like Saudi Arabia for their beheadings whilst attacking the new Islamic State for theirs is total hypocrisy.
Iran's stoning to death of people can be seen on websites along with Iraqi's brutal slaying of rapists in which the whole male community take part in the killing.
Video proof of such "punishments" can all be found on certain "death sites" on the Internet if you want to look hard enough for them.
So whilst we are no way clean when it comes to the rise of ISIS, we should absolutely oppose it for its fundamentalist religious nature.
The fact that I would like Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Taliban to be classed in the same group takes nothing away from the brutality we are facing from this group of 7th century loving killers.
We may have helped stir the pot, and even funded the initial groups who became part of ISIS.
Most definitely the criminal Bandar-Bush enterprise needs it's terrorist tentacles chopping off ASAP.
The close ties between oil rich Saudi Arabia, it's ex ambassador and now terrorist group funding Prince Bandar and the Bush family, whose tarnished history goes way back to Prescott Bush and his Nazi funding days, is long over due some legal oversight.
We have funded Islamic groups to fight Communism and then used them to destabilise countries we wanted to encroach into. The history of our involvement is there for anyone who wants to see it.
One only need research Operation Gladio and Gladio 2 to see why we have allowed these groups to flourish and the benefits we got from allowing them to.
However once again blowback is going to bite the hand that fed it hard and fast.
To get down to basics I don't want to see anymore UK working class men sign up for the Army or RAF to go and fight ISIS.
We have already fought and lost against similar terrorist groups in Afghanistan and Iraq so why keep the military industrial complexes wheels waxed with tax payers money?
Anyway the UK Armed Forces are no match to anyone's anymore due to cuts from Tory and Labour governments. Faced with ISIS captured US anti-aircraft weapons from fleeing Iraqi forces I wouldn't be surprised to see a lot more English people being beheaded by Jihad John or burned alive in cages if we were to return to the killing fields of Iraq and Syria.
We have cut our armed forces to the bare bones. We are certainly not fit for any war worth fighting unless Jersey tried invading Sussex.
Anyway, on a side note, I wonder why Cornwall is Russia's target for "probing"?
It couldn't be anything to do with the huge amount of under-water cables taking Internet and Phone messages across the Atlantic to the USA from Europe could it? Or is it just the western edge of NATO's Europe?
Remember folks if the war in Ukraine actually gets hot between Russia and NATO then China's recent demo of a laser fired into space to destroy a satellite it had "no use for" or in other words, a warning to the USA that they could take down any US satellites they wanted, making the techno dependent US military redundant, will become true. Russia will most certainly do the same.
Russia is well-known to have far superior missiles and rockets than the US and it would be no surprise to see Satellites falling from the skies during the first days of any war.
So whilst some ignorant people may feel that a hot war with Russia over Ukraine and broken promises post Berlin wall are worth going head into, some other fools think that re-sending defeated forces back into Iraq to bomb ISIS from afar will defeat them.
If we want to crush ISIS, and we should, then we should allow the countries most involved to do the fighting. We should also stop funding Nazi's in Kiev and ask Russia to help by arming its proxies in Syria and Iran. With Russian military weapons these two countries could crush them fully without a Western jet being flown.
Jordan is already keen to bomb the hell out of ISIS because of their burned alive pilot, and Iran has been helping the Shia's in Iraq fight ISIS for a long while now.
The Kurds are also well into a hot war at the other end of Iraq and if only we agreed that ISIS was worse for the world than President Assad of Syria then we could allow Syria a free hand to attack from the north.
Why we keep on insisting that President Assad is the real bad guy when there are clearly worse figures about in the area I don't know. We could easily let Syria and Iran with Russian arms squash ISIS in the middle like a cockroach in the night with a heavy shoe.
Then if only we could get Israel who take US arms, de-construct them, and sell them on to Russia and other countries join the fight from the West it would be game over.
I know that sounds like a dream but logically it makes sense. It's just a shame logic pays no part in foreign affairs or Israel's behaviour in the world.
Israel has one of the biggest and most sophisticated armies in the world yet they spend their time either setting up fake al-Qaeda groups to then "catch" or allowing the US to instead. Just like leading a blind and dumb rat to a piece of poisoned cheese.
If only Israel could stop using their military might to crush the cornered and starving people of Gaza and instead realised the threat to their east. Their weaponry would be no match to ISIS if they actually fought them.
However if they are not worried about ISIS then it can only be due to their infiltration of, or setting up of, ISIS networks. Nothing else makes sense.
For the Islamic State, who should in all theory from their previous and past behaviour, hate Jews and Zionists, not try to attack Israel it can only be down to the fact that they are bought and paid for terrorists - like so many al-Qaeda networks before them.
If ISIS do attack Israel then they will have a real enemy to fight for once instead of pretend Iranian nukes and Gazan fire cracker rockets.
They could then join the pincer movement by Assad from the north and the Kurds, and Iraq and Iran from the south to crush this disgusting beast as hard as it likes. They don't even have to hold hands with Iran to do it, they are all neighbours with an unwelcome guest, so they should all want to resolve the problem.
It doesn't matter who created ISIS.
It doesn't matter which Saudi Royals still fund it as their government cries out for help between beheadings every Friday after prayers.
It doesn't matter if ISIS are owned, created or stage-managed actors, they are still scum that need demolishing.
The only thing that matters is that the axis of war doesn't go back into an area they have just left tails dangling between their legs.
If Islamic countries (and hopefully Jewish) can come together in their area of influence to destroy this beast on their own then it will do more for the social cohesion of the Middle East than anything the Western nations have done since World War One when the French and English carved up the lands that created Iraq in the first place.
Let's leave the fighting to the people who have most to lose.
It will be clear to see if ISIS don't attack Israel that something very, very wrong is occurring, and on any account Israel joining Iran to destroy this evil creation can only be a good thing, whether together or by separate means.
Lets just agree to not send anymore of our boys out to these deserts to fight.
I am not committing a crime by taking this strong opiate because I am being prescribed it by my GP for my pain.
It's given to me in patches I stick on my body where the drug is slowly absorbed over 2 days . It's supposed to be 3 days but I am on the highest dose and the GP has overruled NICE rules on medications due to the severity of my condition.
When I go to the chemist to collect my supply they have to get it from the Controled Drugs Supply where I then sign an extra part of the form.
It is a strong drug, one that I was told by a girl I met who worked at a homeless centre when I was in iceland (where heroin wasn't available) that if I threw one of my patches into the middle of a crowd of homeless addicts they would fight to the death over it.
Apparently due to the lack of heroin any Icelandic addict would cook these patches up, extract the Fentanyl and then inject or smoke it.
Basically though it doesn't touch the sides on me and I get no buzz at all from taking it through a patch. This is probably why I am prescribed the maximum amount and over 2 not 3 days plus other prescribed pain killers, and of course taking other strong drugs as well to ease the pain.
For me to be on a drug that is legal because a GP gave it to me and for another person to be a criminal for using it because they bought it off me in the streets is madness in my mind.
Why is it ok to take a mind and body altering drug when it is supplied by the "system" but not when you buy it to take it for recreational purposes.
Why is it okay to ease the pain of the body but not of the mind?
You can see how the Goverments involved in cracking down doors in the morning and locking up junkies are two faced by the way they keep the drugs flowing.
From Vietnam and the Golden Triangle, Columbia and Mexico and their own internal wars and to Afghanistan where opium and now Heroin production has increased hugely since the most recent war started.
Let's not forget that it was US policy to let Opium be grown in Afghanistan when the Soviets were at war in the same country 30 years ago to get their soldiers addicted and demoralise them as well as use the funds from the sales to pay for weapons for what is now al-Qaeda.
You can read all about the CIA's involvment in the production and selling of drugs in this 4 part article and the most amazing quote comes from the biggest heroin producer in the 1980's from Burma, Khun Sa, who when interviewed claimed that the the CIA were one of his best customers.
"by 1986 he was refining 80 percent of the opium harvest in the Golden Triangle. The king of opium trade, Khun Sa had risen to become the world’s largest single heroin trafficker by controlling 60 percent of the world’s illicit opium supply."
"In 1986, Bo Gritz went to Burma with White House approval to meet with Khun Sa who supposedly had information on American MIAs. Khun Sa said that he wanted to end the opium and heroin traffic in his territory and to expose American officials involved in the drug smuggling. Gritz claimed that he took this message to the United States government and was told by Tom Harvey of the National Security Council that “there is no interest here” in the Khun Sa overture. Gritz had in his possession 40 hours of video tape of Khun Sa who “charged American officials, both past and present, with being the chief buyers of drugs produced in that part of the world.” He also claimed that he wanted to stop drug trafficking, but that the United States government would not let him. Khun Sa said that the CIA were some of his best customers. He offered support to the DEA to alert them of drug movements, but this was rejected at the headquarters level."
For more information about the CIA’s involvement in drug smuggling please read the following articles:
You might aready know that the rulers of our world have no interest in stopping the war on drugs just like they have no interest in stopping the war on terror.
They are benefiting from it.
They are earning good money from the misery of others and it just shows what kind of people we are being controlled by when they would rather make another billion to add to their existing hundreds than stop people living in squalour taking heroin to ease the pain of the existence these overlords have created for them.
What a world.
As I sit here and write this I am watching Russell Brand's documentary on the war on drugs on BBC3.
It discusses the fact that we are all tring to escape reality because reality is so crap.
As some ex addict says "Drugs and Drink are the answer to reality"- It's true.
When reality is so crap that it doesn't give you anything more than cheap consumerism, materialism, banksterism and a lack of jobs and free training for people who want it.
Why wouldn't you want to escape reality by going up the pub, taking drugs, watching TV or other mind numbing activities.
I suggest you watch his documentary as he interviews politiicans, goes on drug raids, speaks to addicts and politiicans and visits drug clinics in Switzerland where people are allowed to bang up and smoke crack.
Russel Brand - End The Drugs War
This is the blurb above the video on YouTube.com.
Russell Brand:
End the Drugs War BBC Full Documentary 2014
The documentary Russell Brand made for BBC Three in 2012 concluded with him giving evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee. Drawing on his own experience of drug taking and recovery, he advocated treating addiction as a health issue rather than a criminal problem and underlined his own belief that abstinence is the best way to help addicts.
Since then the Committee has reported its findings, concluding that the British drugs laws were failing and that it was a 'now or never' moment to reform them. But David Cameron didn't agree, insisting that the drugs policy is working in Britain and that we should 'stick at it'.
In this personal journey for BBC Three, Russell Brand sets out to challenge that point of view. He wants to find out how other countries are tackling their problems of drug abuse and to explore how the framework of criminalization implicit in the 'war on drugs' produces enormous harm in the treatment of addicts. Russell believes that 'a shift' is happening in the way that people view drug addiction. But to really change things he needs to persuade those who have power.
Russell starts on the frontline of the 'war on drugs' by joining the Met Police as they carry out dawn drug raids, and ends up sharing a police cell with a young addict who has been in and out of prison since she began taking drugs aged 12. He witnesses the dangers of street addiction in Birmingham, but is as shocked by what he sees in the legal 'drug-consumption room' he visits in Berne, capital of conservative Switzerland.
At a drug recovery conference, Russell is drawn into an argument about abstinence versus government methadone programmes, but also finds an unlikely ally for his campaign in a Tory lord. At a UN drugs conference in Vienna he meets the politician who in 2001 decriminalized drugs in Portugal. What Russell discovers from him informs his impassioned plea at the end of the conference that drugs should be decriminalized.
As he takes his argument public, Russell finds his views are challenged by those who say that the public fear that lifting criminalization will also lift drug use. But a second encounter with the young addict he met during the Met drug raid (who, since then, has been in prison, been released and is back on drugs) bolsters his belief.
Russell meets the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, who surprises him by agreeing in principle that the 'war on drugs' is futile and unsuccessful, but then frustrates him by explaining the lack of political will to move forward quickly to change things for the better.
Presenter Russell Brand
Executive Producer Liz Hartford
Producer Ross Wilson
Director Ross Wilson
Production Company Matchlight Ltd