The USA Isn't Supposed To Be Any War Zones According To Kamala Harris So Why Is It Still In Syria?
By Dark Politricks
They won't admit it but the USA, have, and still occupy a 3rd of Syria, supposedly after the war against ISIS a creation of Israel and the CIA, which was supposedly defeated by the US military, under Donald Trump's first term in office.
"The report, citing interviews with numerous rebel figures, said Israeli support included paying rebel fighters a salary of some $75 a month and providing groups with weapons and other materials."
"We wouldn't have survived without Israel's assistance."
There are so many armed militant groups fighting the Syrians, Iranians, Russians, Israeli's and Americans in Syria still, from the old Jabhat al-Nusra Front linked al-Qaeda group, the Free Syria Army, ISIS, the Kurds and the YPG and SDF who are seen as terrorists by Turkey but have been used at times by the Americans to fight Assad and the Axis of Resistance.
These terrorist groups can easily fall out with each other when allied, or be funded and trained without knowing where the money really came from. Apparently is it not uncommon for US DOD soldiers to fight rebels, that can trace their funding and training, back to the intelligence services of the US DOD or the famous 3, CIA, Mossad and MI6.
The Axis of Resistance includes: the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, IRCG-QF, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad Al-Quds brigade, Hezbollah, Hamas and the odd Russian or two.
These are all of course bit players in The Great Game being fought out by the bigger powers involved in the battle to control valuable resources like Syrian oil such as Europe, America, Turkey, Iran and even Russia who has a port on the Mediterranean Sea at Tartus, and has defended Assad from Israeli and ISIS attacks.
A Russian spy plane caught images of trucks taking stolen oil from ISIS controlled areas to Turkey at one stage, where it was allowed across the border, and fresh fighters flowed back. This was bluntly blamed on the Turkish President whose family was directly benefiting from the stolen product.
Russian image of Syrian Terrorist to Turkey Oil Smuggling
"Turkey is the main consumer of the oil stolen from its rightful owners, Syria and Iraq.
"According to information we've received, the senior political leadership of the country President Erdogan and his family are involved in this criminal business."
At one point it got quite hairy when the Turkish government shot down a Su-24M Russian jet, that had crossed into Turkish air space for a couple of minutes as it was turning around and was shot down, and a pilot was killed, and one captured by Turkish backed rebels in Syria.
The Russian Defense Ministry condemned the attack, with President Vladimir Putin calling it a “stab in the back” and a “provocation.” Turkey, however, maintained that its actions were justified, citing its right to defend its sovereign territory.
After all the years of war, and the attempted colour revolution by the Americans, plus lies of President Assad gassing his own people the country is a mess.
The Kurds want their own homeland but are seen by both Iraq and Turkey as terrorists despite being called some of the fiercest fighters US military have seen in combat versus the terror group ISIS, Donald Trump is proud of claiming to have destroyed.
This is despite the groups nefarious roots in the failed occupation of Iraq and for it idealistic claim to have created an Islamic Caliphate. However, one thing should be noted which should arise suspicion in anyone with knowledge of Islamist terror groups, it not once attacked Israel, the enemy of all militant Islamic groups. I wonder why that was?
The part of Syria the USA holds, which is roughly a third with not many men, is of course the part where the oil comes from and most of Syria's crops are grown. This is supposedly to stop Assad from benefiting from what's his ultimately his countries wealth to benefit his own people, you know like feeding them and paying for schools and evil stuff like that.
Maybe it's more to do with supplying Israel with oil it can't get due to the Houthi rebels blockade of the Red Sea and successful attacks on tankers attempting to access it, including piracy and attacks with drones, and even ballistic missiles.
Apparently they recently successfully fired a hypersonic missile into a US aircraft carrier, the Abraham Lincoln, the other week who had to go home for repairs.
Check Judge Napolitano's interview with Dr. Gilbert Doctorow on Judging Freedom for more details.
The Houthis definitely don't have the guidance technology to accurately target a US aircraft carrier, and neither would Iran, which suggests Russia is helping the Houthis successfully strike targets miles away across Saudi Arabia, as well as into the Red Sea to stop important cargo reaching or leaving Israel from the South.
When the USA leaves Syria is anyone's guess but the soldiers deployed there got a bit angry during the 2024 election, when Kamala Harris claimed that no US forces were deployed around the world, saying on camera "Well what are we doing here then?".
So if the troops don't know, and the Biden admin doesn't know, then maybe they are what many are calling a "tripwire" for an Iranian attack on Israel, and US bases in the region.
They would have no defense against the super fast Iranian hypersonic missiles they are prepared to fire at Israel if attacked, and if injury or death is sustained, then this could mean a definite war for Israel who has wanted the US to fight its greatest foe in the region for decades now.
This would be a great welcome gift from Biden to Trump along with the problems with Russia in Ukraine. Trump, who ran on a pro peace platform, will have to fight and probably lose this game in the Middle East, unless he or Israel uses nuclear weapons.
So there you go, American troops deliberately put in harms way, just so Iran can attack and kill them causing a regional conflict in the area. A sweet parting gift from the Democrats to MAGA.
I've always wondered why Israel needed to make so many lies up over Oct 7th, and continue to do so. The events were bad enough, so I have no idea why the Israeli government needed to embellish the story with over the top tales of extreme brutality.
Hamas were brutal in their attack, and although many crimes and people killed by the IDF were carried out by Hamas, others were just Gazans who entered the hole in the fence and went on their own rampage.
Also the IDF, who turned up after an hour, which in a small country I find very slow and odd to explain, killed many of their own people in the chaos, and were probably ashamed to admit this to their people.
Despite this news came out from Haaretz an Israeli newspaper, who interviewed a woman held hostage in her home by Hamas, but had an Israeli tank blow it up killing everyone inside but her.
Recently they claimed to have shot down all incoming missiles from Iran. This is despite their famed Iron Dome which was totally ineffective, and their F-35 air base in the Negev Desert was totally destroyed. This included a top of the range US Raytheon radar system, that supposedly made it one of the most protected air spaces in the world.
However, the Iron Dome and other air defence systems were breached, and even the HQ of Mossad was destroyed.
Despite the gaslighting by the Israeli and US MSM, Iran actually landed up to 20 missiles on the Negev desert base, showing that Israeli and US air defences could be breached.
However, like last time they attacked they gave the US and Russia a 2 hour warning so that no Israeli personnel were killed. This is unlike Israel who see the killing and terrorising of people as an aim of their war tactics.
This Grayzone video is worth watching. and I dare Zionists to look into the facts as they all come from Israeli sources. Either victims of the IDF using the Hannibal Directive to kill their own citizens, and papers or TV, reporting on the events.
Atrocity Inc: How Israel Sells The Destruction Of Gaza
Watch @MaxBlumenthal's new documentary takedown of the media deceptions and hoaxes Israel pushed to manufacture consent for its genocidal assault on Gaza
Another US Presidential Election - Nothing Will Change - Again!
By Dark Politricks
Here comes another US Presidential election and another mess for the rest of the world to look to and ask itself:
"Is this really Democracy?"
I think many countries, especially the few left who have any real belief in the US as a "beacon of freedom", will be answering in the negative. Those who know better, or act with the US as cohorts, such as the EU, will keep quiet and pretend the great experiment in "liberty and natural born human rights" created in1776's is continuing.
Those who have been tampered with through US bribery, coups, unfair economic tariffs or sanctions, will again see that the American's cry of "US Freedom and Democracy" that the USA believes is the ideal way to force run other societies, is a lie inside it's own borders.
Nothing will happen to better or change the lives for the average US citizen whoever gets into power. Everyone with half a brain knows the real reigns of power are not controlled by the President or Vice President.
Whoever thought that showing the start of that meeting on public air waves did a severe disservice to anyone with any remaining thoughts that the US elected politicians wielded any real power. They obviously don't if Joe or his wife can run the executive branch of US government.
No one in the world will feel much difference when the Deep State gains further power through the election of supposedly populist Donald Trump, or the blackwashed Kamala Harris.
The powers that stay hidden seem to be backing the blackwashed, grand daughter of Irish slave traders, who according to some has been faking a history so murky it compares to the claims made by Trump back when Obama was running first for President. When Obama's birth certificate and Kenyan heritage, was big news, along with a possible passport issued by the British Empire.
This is something that would have made him illegitimate under US law to hold the highest office in the land. It's probably the same as someone coming from the ex British Crown colony of Jamacia, now in the British Commonwealth. Here is a look into the Democratic nominee for Presidents history, and her family background that she seems to be hiding the truth about.
Candace Owens Looks Into The Blackwashing of Kamala Harris
However, to the real rulers of power it makes little difference who they place in the public facing office. A political patsie to take all the flack the masses may throw at them for the failure of the government to actually do anything to help the people of the country, rather than their donors, the MIC and Big Business.
Those voters actually taking time off work to vote, might think it actually makes a difference what choice they make. Maybe some know that if the Empire wanted to, their swipe on an electronic voting machine could easily be switched in a second to their opponent. It doesn't take Russia to do the hacking, but it helps that they or Iran could be blamed for doing so.
I think it has been clear for years, and with every years Las Vegas Def Con Voting Village competition, even kids are now able to hack the latest voting machines. Therefore it makes it little more than a trivial event for those behind the scenes to switch the voting tally if they cared to do so. Those millions who will vote, will all no doubt make claims of another "stolen election", if their candidate doesn't win.
I still cannot get over the hypocrisy of the Democrats who moaned so much about Trumps dislike of the way the 2020 COVID election was handled. This was when due to the plandemic, votes could just be dropped off in mailboxes with no security to manage or control the access to these important boxes. His claims of foul play were just dismissed as the cries of a bitter loser who wanted to steal the election and other-throw the government.
However, people seem to forget that in 2016, when Trump won, the Democrats made the same claims about a stolen election. Hillary Clinton (who had told Trump to run for office believing him to be an easier contender to beat), was so bemused and angry over her loss to Trump, that she made up a whole 4 year news cycle of lies and distortions that became the infamous and now debunked Russigate hoax.
The Democrats definitely cried foul, and their lackies in the MSM touted as gospel, with nightly bombshell reports from Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, about Russia collusion that all turned out to be false. If there was any real proof that Russia had an agent running as the US POTUS then I think there would have been more than a failed attempt at impeachment.
Although many were destroyed, others were leaked. Most famously the Podesta emails probably sent to WikiLeaks by DNC staffer Seth Rich, who died in a "botched robbery", in which nothing was stolen, and the MSM covered it up as a right wing conspiracy. They just added it to their Russia is to blame for Trump being elected delusion, and their incorrect conclusion that Trump had somehow robbed her of that 2016 election.
The botched robbery maybe true, and maybe Russia hacked the DNC then passed the info along to WikiLeaks. Thousands of GB slowly trickling out of the servers without being noticed. Or maybe someone working there just downloaded them and passed them along on a USB drive.
It seems though that whoever wins the election for the world to clap their hands at and marvel at the "greatest nation on earth" and their Democratic Process, that the fate of the world hangs in the balance whoever becomes the outward face, whether pretending to be someone they are not, or just beholden to foreign interests.
Either compromised through blackmail at an Epstein or P Diddler party, or just beholden to AIPAC or other big money interests seemingly needed by most politicians to run for President or the Senate/Congress.
The MSM is also trying to spin it in case of a successful hit or even not, that Iranian hitmen are all about, and that they are behind the attempts on his life, despite the attempted assassins links to the intelligence services.
However, Trump seems to believe in these claims that it's Iran trying to kill him not Deep State trained nutjobs, that the MIC are using as Patsies. I don't doubt he will go after Iran and back Israel up in their regional war, whether or not he helps close down the Ukrainian threat to global stability and real and potential nuclear conflict with Russia.
It knows that it is US/UK/NATO troops not Ukrainians, that load in the secure satellite based targeting data needed for long range attacks into it's country, and it will declare war on those countries if attacked by Storm Shadows or ATACM missiles.
So whoever becomes the face of the next US government, we can be assured of more US aggression whether its is in Ukraine, or the Middle East.
The MIC and Deep State are not going to let the people of the USA have a real voice at the ballot box.
All that matters is the money those companies like Raytheon and BAe pump in to support Presidential candidates, and paying them back in the best way they know how;
Israel Massacre Kids and Women with Snipers - World Says Nothing
By Dark Politricks
As Israel carries on massacring women, children and disabled people, using the excuse that they were all Hamas, when that was plainly wrong.
There may have been some Hamas fighters in the protest but for snipers to kill women and kids is just disgusting and I expect a security council vote and veto by the USA as they always do.
The protest is about their storage in the biggest open air prison on earth and Israel is using the excuses of Syrian fire, people with burning tyres attacking them (against one of the most sophisticated armies in the world), Hamas organisation when it was the adversary of their displacement.
Why do we let Israel get away with this?
Why does the US shut their mouth - the Saudi Petrodollar agreement, Israels hold over the US Congress and the fact that the US thinks that it and Israel can just start wars and kill innocent people with no recompense.
The USA is the most dangerous country in the world. They believe they can just enter other countries and bomb them for the sake of Israel or mineral resources.
No other country does this.
Others may follow along the US Axis of War like the UK, French and Israelis but now that Iran has stopped selling it's oil in US dollars (the Petrodollar), the US press and UK press are going to be pushing hard on Iran and maybe even going so far as to start a war with Iran as they have with previous nations who dared stop using the petrodollar. This is where all oil has to be bought in dollars, so countries have to transfer first from their own currency to US money before buying the oil.
In return Saudi Arabia, a 7th century hell hole that jails and whips gang raped women, and sends US armaments, that they buy in the billions, to Jihadists in Syria and other nations, and send Wahabist terrorists across the world.
Saudi Arabia and Israel want to stop Iran becoming a strong player in the region, however they forget that it was the war in Iraq that was holding a balance between Kurds, Sunnis and the Shi'ites in the south near Iran.
Iran shouldn't forget what happened when Iraq and Libya stopped using the dollar, they used false flags and WMD BS, bombings before UN reports their data to be incorrect like the recent Syrian attack and then convince the masses on their owned MSM news channels to follow along.
Killing hundreds of thousands of people, leaving Libya a terrorist playground, turning Iraq and Syria into a bombed out mess, the creation of ISIS which even the CIA funnels weapons from Libya to Syria to, before training their supposed enemy to fight President Assad and Russia.
If we had any morals at all we would be bombing Saudi Arabia and forcing Israel to stop their massacres on innocent people.
However we make money from war, our arms industries are some of the most profitable in the world. Why stop the Saudis and US massacring the poorest nation on the planet, causing disease and famine in Yemen for morals.
It seems only the US can dictate moral behaviour, start preemptive wars which they banned after Nuremberg and drop freedom and democracy from the air on the end of a drone when they don't even have it at home.
The UK has already started printing stories about English prisoners in Iranian jails and US news shows attack Palestinians for daring to try and break out of their open air prison.
I mean a man killed by a sniper sitting in a wheelchair must have been a suicide bomber waiting to attack....
I have here a list of Jimmy Dore Videos which lay it out for you.
Donald Trumps recent speech was met with laughter at the UN general assembly as he congratulated himself on being the most popular and active US Presidency in history, forgetting all about previous Presidents such as Lincoln, JFK, Roosevelt and even Washington.
Was this just Trump's clinical narcissism on display once again and how does he honestly believe his administration has accomplished more than almost any other previous administration in less than 2 years.
Does the biggest ever arms sale to Saudi Arabia, a country Trump blamed for 9.11 during the Obama administration, count as making the world safer as they cause disease and misery by bombing Yemen and supplying head chopping Jihadists in Syria with weapons.
Does destroying the Iranian nuclear deal which Iran had kept to for the sake of Israel make war with Iran more or less likely?
What about pulling out of international climate change agreements and ignoring the International Criminal Court. Does he believe the US is above International Law?
Does he not realise that placing sanctions on Russia and now China makes the world more likely to head into a major conflict, even WW3, or is this his bright vision for a safer world?
What about the arming of ISIS and al-Qaeda in Syria to other-throw President Assad and the massive bombing of the country over a false flag chemical attack. Not waiting for the results of international inspectors who concluded that no such Syrian attack took place. Does this uninvited bombing and potential partitioning of Syria for Israel's benefit make the US look like peace keepers or war mongers?
Jake from Blackstone Intelligence analyses his speech.
You will hear the following in this recent CWW7News broadcast:
China and Russia warn the US of dire consequences over recent sanctions due to China buying weapons from Russia and breaking the new US Russian 3rd party sanction laws.
British and French fighters are scrambled multiple times to intercept Russian bombers over the North Sea.
New Mind-control jets mean soldiers can control up to three warplanes with a Brain implant.
Israel is upgrading their illegal nuclear defences in response to threats from Iran and Syria.
Israel says it will use all its might if war is forced upon us.
Russia accepts the official take on the Syrian downing of it's plane and more coordination goes on between the countries over anti aircraft defence weapons.
Who wants WWIII?
It seems that Donald Trump, the recent laughing stock at the UN General Assembly does and believes massive increases in weapon sales to Saudi Arabia, Israel and their own increases in defence spending is all aimed at keeping peace around the globe.
More weapons equals peace keeping it seems to some.
If you know what is going on in Syria you will know the war is about two competing oil pipelines.
One heavily backed by the Rothschild's, Rupert Murdoch and other Globalists who see Iran as the big threat in the area along with Israel and Saudi Arabia. Iran also wants a pipeline to run through the Shi'ite controlled Iraq, something the US did not want to happen as in after fighting for so long in the area the Government has now grown closer to Iran.
There is talk of a "double tap" where the USA and the rest of the Axis of War allies e.g UK, France and of course Israel are all sending ships to the area, with an intent of invading Syria and Iran at the same time.
This also is in Israel's interest as they want to expand as in the greater Israel project plans and keep the Muslims of the area fighting each other.
If you read ex Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky book "By Way of Deception" you will see that after Israel had got rid of Libya in the 80's they were planning on taking out Iraq altogether and using US troops to do so.
The IDF hardly do any of their own fighting on a large-scale unless it's massacring imprisoned Gazans and killing kids throwing stones at tanks. Either killing women and kids and their farm animals or getting their arses kicked by Hezbollah in Lebanon.
That is why AIPAC controls Congress and as Benji said "America is easily swayed one way or another", basically Israel controls the US foreign policy.
Now like me you may have thought ISIS and al-Qaeda. Remember Al-Qaeda was just a database of Jihadists who were called upon by the US to fight in Afghanistan against the Russians.
Blow-back big time and numerous false flags later and al-Qaeda, a name Osama bin-Laden didn't even recognise until he heard the US call him and his hired hands by that term, became the US's mortal enemy or so it seemed.
So to find out that the Russians have been warning the US that an area containing a large number of ISIS/al-Qaeda/al-Nusra Front and other CIA trained jihadists is going to be attacked soon and for the Americans to get out of the way. Basically giving them notice and time to do so it is strange, and stranger still is that the US is sending more US troops into this exact area that is to be attacked to act as human shields against the Russians.
Now this is very dangerous and stupid.
If a US soldier is killed we won't hear on the nightly news that the US were using their troops as human shields to protect al-Qaeda and ISIS.
We will just hear about Russian war mongering and we will probably end up in a war with Russia. Something we don't want as the Russians have some highly effective anti-aircraft and aircraft carrier missiles and Obama had to save face under his term when 2 of his missiles sent from a ship in the Mediterranean were shot down by Russian defenses. Of course the MSM didn't report this.
There is another area I reported on a week or so back about how the last major city in Eastern Syria, that the ISIS remnants are holed up in, is in place for another fake false flag "chemical attack".
The Russians have been warning that English-speaking people have been seen in the area and chemicals have been brought in to stage a false flag which the US has said it would blame on Russia for not stopping.
You should really watch the previous video to understand the comments coming out of the Russian Duma and Military including the use of tactical nuclear weapons.
The main thing is that the US public don't realise that their supposed enemy of enemies Al-Qaeda is just a term that can be placed on any Jihadist group and then that authorises the President to attack them.
However for the sheeple who still believe a man on kidney dialysis living in a cave brought down the twin towers, and the Pentagon despite the FBI saying on their most wanted list that there was no evidence linking bin-Laden to the 9.11 attacks Al-Qaeda remains the common man who only reads sports pages their enemy that needs to be defeated.
Ask these people who don't question the crap spewed at them by Rachel Maddow and FOX News:why is the CIA and USA arming and training their supposed mortal enemy, al-Qaeda?
They are now using US soldiers as human shields and pushing for a full conflict with Russia that could turn into World War 3.
This is not good news and should be spread wide and far.
Please watch Jake from Blackstone Intelligence put the pieces together as he does a lot of research and doesn't just read US Today but also get news from Israel, Russia, China, Iran and other countries. Like most of us should do.
We are force-fed bullshit by our state-run news companies like the BBC, or "independent" news companies that always support a war (CNN, MSNBC, FOX etc) and during combat or the run up to it always have ex and current military members on their shows to push the plans further down the average Americans throat.
These people in the dark need to know how close we are to a proper nuclear war.
Russia is holding a 300,000 troop exercise with the Chinese army on the last day of the Syrian peace conferenceand a Russian general has said it was necessary and our only hope.
I can only deduce from that he means that the huge show of force, new weapons and a whole city on the move under live fire will shock the Americans into not staging the false flag attack they are planning.
The last US claimed gas attack has now been declared a non event by independent investigators who went there to see what happened.
However Trump and his neo-con army acted before evidence was in and they carried out a massive bombing raid despite fake evidence supplied by the White Helmets of babies being washed down despite the people doing the washing not wearing any protective gear.
This time the Russians have been warning the West for weeks not to attempt another false flag but they know no-one is listening and depend on #altnews sites and YouTube channels like Blackstone intelligence to get the news out in the hope people listen and the Axis of War fails to attempt another false flag attack.
They don't want to start WWIII but they are now at the end of their tether and I suspect if the Axis of War carries out their plans they won't be holding back.
Please spread this article and video far and wide.
View the Blackstone Intelligence video at YouTube.
I remember when Bilderberg was just a conspiracy theory held by people with tin foil hats. However once exposed it was naturalized into "just a meeting of rich men with gay prostitutes bussed in for their sexual needs" and photos were taken and notes of the meetings they had were sanitised and released to a few papers who could spin them into a peaceful meeting where all mankind would be helped.
Lets look at the Bilderberg meeting and the people attending this year
This year Bilderberg 2018 it is very strange the number of war mongering angles that can be found in the people going, and other meetings taking place.
There is also a meeting of NATO on the same weekend, and the G7 meeting.
Two of the items on the agenda, along with all the ex and current military people attending is "Russia" - of course - and "Saudi Arabia and Iran".
Now we know NATO will be talking Russia and Iran and the G7 meeting also. How hard would it be for World Leaders at the G7 to hop on a plane to the Italian location of Bilderberg or have a conference call on Skype.
Now if that is not bad then we also have the first time a Pope's representative is coming.
Just to maker it better Russia, China and Iran are also having their own defence group meeting as well at the same time.
We will have to see what happens as this Bilderberg meeting is something special as this video exposes.
So what will these groups of Western anti-Russia anti-China anti-Iranian nations be discussing at all these meetings.
Instead of thinking of ways to make the world a better place to live in they want to by reducing tensions with Russia, Iran and China and re-using all their bloated military budgets to help the homeless, the veterans, the people with no money to pay for health care, or feeding the population of Africa and making the world a better place, they will probably be talking about war.
They could all discussing a way to create a pre-text or false flag, that people would actually believe this time and allow them to go to war with the one country Israel hates the most and Saudi Arabia has offered to pay the USA for all costs in removing the regime. This is not about nukes it is about regime change.
Syria needs to be toppled first, with its Iranian army units, and Hezbollah fighters on the Lebanon border. A fight they don't want a repeat of the 2006 war where the Israelis came running back with their tails between their legs.
Once that is accomplished the only decision is whether to attack Iran and start World War III with the whole Muslim world and Russia and China and how to do it without the use of nuclear weapons.
Maybe that is why the Americans have spent decades building huge tunnel networks under their land so that they can go and live under ground for a few hundred years before re-emerging and living up to the principles of the Georgia Guidestones that state the world should have no more than a 500,000 world population.
People of no use would probably be dispensed of in Chinese dying rooms but in their Utopian minds maybe they do think that this is the way to create utopia. To some of them China is their ideal way of living. #
A police state, where even Taxis have hidden microphones in the cars to record people's conversations and people go to work, criticism of the new world order is not even allowed and all is right with the world.....
Robots would do most of the work, AI makes constant money on the stock market and creates other better, stronger robots with more AI than all the last post-modernistic Hollywood films of recent years.
Indoctrinated and enslaved the 500,000 would be monitored constantly and have their needs met whilst ruled by the post nuclear holocaust Oligarchy.
Now the Chilcot report is out, does this mean that the Tory Government have the balls to go and arrest Tony Blair for pushing the illegal Iraq war?
Here was someone who knew that the evidence was false yet still promised George W Bush to be with him whatever, despite the UN and his own legal advisers, saying that the war was illegal.
Just like the many EU referendums before BREXIT, it was "no that's the wrong answer, go and find the right one", until a dodgy legal basis was provided to give Blair cover for his actions by Lord Goldsmith. I wonder how and why he got given his title....
I doubt any Tories will do anything to put their establishment buddy Blair's head in the block as it would mean putting their own heads in as well. Many of them eagerly went along with the falsehood that many in the world knew was a blatant lie.
They were hoping to take the sting out of the massive news story it will surely become, their own names off the front pages, and provide a different headline for the newspapers. However we must ensure that #Chilcot stays in the news and social media despite other political manoeuvrings.
If we have to wait for the Blairites to return to the Labour fold and for Corbyn to get elected before seeing Blair in the Hague then we could be waiting a long time. However hopefully a massive class action case by the families of dead UK soldiers, and maybe millions of Iraqi's hurt by the war, could be formed to take him to civil court instead.
The Palestinians had this to say about Tony Blair:
There is no one within the Palestinian leadership that supports or likes or trusts Tony Blair, particularly because of the very damaging role he played during our UN bid.
He is considered persona non grata in Palestine. Although we can't prevent him from coming here, we can hopefully minimise the role he can play because he is not a mediator, he is totally biased on one side.
So what were the main findings of the Chilcot report which we have had to wait 7 years for?
There was no imminent threat from Saddam Hussein; The strategy of containment could have been adapted and continued for some time; The majority of the Security Council supported continuing UN inspections and monitoring.
The UK chose to join the invasion of Iraq before the peaceful options for disarmament had been exhausted. Military action at that time was not a last resort.
On 28 July 2002, the then Prime Minister Tony Blair assured US President George W Bush he would be with him "whatever". But in the letter, he pointed out that a US coalition for military action would need: Progress on the Middle East peace process; UN authority; and a shift in public opinion in the UK, Europe, and among Arab leaders.
Judgements about the severity of threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction - known as WMD - were presented with a certainty that was not justified.
Intelligence had "not established beyond doubt" that Saddam Hussein had continued to produce chemical and biological weapons.
Policy on Iraq was made on the basis of flawed intelligence assessments. It was not challenged, and should have been.
The circumstances in which it was decided that there was a legal basis for UK military action were "far from satisfactory".
The invasion began on 20 March 2003 but not until 13 March did then Attorney General Lord Goldsmith advise there was on balance a secure legal basis for military action. Apart from No 10's response to his letter on 14 March, no formal record was made of that decision and the precise grounds on which it was made remain unclear.
The UK's actions undermined the authority of the United Nations Security Council: The UN's Charter puts responsibility for the maintenance of peace and security in the Security Council. The UK government was claiming to act on behalf of the international community "to uphold the authority of the Security Council". But it knew it did not have a majority supporting its actions.
In Cabinet, there was little questioning of Lord Goldsmith about his advice and no substantive discussion of the legal issues recorded
Between 2003 and 2009, UK forces in Iraq faced gaps in some key capability areas - including armoured vehicles, reconnaissance and intelligence assets and helicopter support.
Despite explicit warnings, the consequences of the invasion were underestimated. The planning and preparations for Iraq after Saddam Hussein were "wholly inadequate".
The government failed to achieve the stated objectives it had set itself in Iraq. More than 200 British citizens died as a result of the conflict. Iraqi people suffered greatly. By July 2009, at least 150,000 Iraqis had died, probably many more. More than one million were displaced.
The report sets out lessons to be learned: It found Mr Blair overestimated his ability to influence US decisions on Iraq; and the UK's relationship with the US does not require unconditional support.
So will anyone apart from Jeremy Corbyn whose whole party seems to have deserted him despite having overwhelming support from the Labour membership and Trade Unions do anything about the lies of Tony Blair that led us to war and the creation of ISIS which haunts us all now?
Despite the massacres, huge car bombs killing hundreds almost on a daily basis during the Iraq civil war, journalists getting their heads cut off by ISIS and al-Qaeda and the strengthening of Iran, Tony Blair still thinks he made the right decision. He said this in the report:
Whether people agree or disagree with my decision to take military action against Saddam Hussein; I took it in good faith and in what I believed to be the best interests of the country
So no remorse then for the many people killed and injured from 2003 to this very day, all coming from his decision to back George W Bush who had some narcissistic desire to achieve what his father didn't in the earlier Gulf War, remove Saddam from power. This was despite any links to 9.11 or any evidence that he posed a threat to the region.
I have no doubt that the USA believed Saddam still had weapons of mass destruction because they used to sell him so many of them, including the nerve gas which he used against Iranian soldiers and Iraqi rebels.
No complaint was made about it at the time of the event but when it came to the standard demonisation of the enemy before a war all this was put into the heads of the public to paint a horrible picture of their ex friend and enabled dictator.
Despite warnings by the CIA that Iraq was using chemical weapons almost daily Donald Rumsfeld who was at the time a successful executive in the pharmaceutical industry, continued to make it possible for Saddam to buy supplies from American firms.
This included biological weapons and viruses such as anthrax and bubonic plague. Also during the time the US was selling Iraq chemical and biological weapons the UK under Maggie Thatcher was selling up to 78 different types of military equipment including Land Rovers, tank recovery vehicles, terrain-following radar and spare tank parts according to released government reports.
Apparently this pleased Maggie very much. She said she was "very pleased" with the "Contracts worth over £150m [that] have been concluded [with Iraq] in the last six months including one for £34m (for armoured recovery vehicles through Jordan)," which was written by a junior minister, Thomas Trenchard, in 1981.
This letter also stated that meetings with Saddam Hussein "represent a significant step forward in establishing a working relationship with Iraq which should produce both political and major commercial benefits”.
So not only did the UK and USA help stock up Saddam Hussein with all the WMD they then accused him of having, a very hypocritical move but to be expected by the two major powers in the axis of continual war, but we actually helped him use those weapons on Iranians.
Iran was finally brought to the negotiating table by providing Iraq the location of Iranian troops, as well as the locations of Iranian logistics facilities and details about Iranian air defences once they had learned that Iran was about to gain a major strategic advantage in the 8 year long war.
They were fully aware that Hussein’s military would attack with chemical weapons, including sarin and mustard gas prior to four major offensives in early 1988 that relied on U.S. satellite imagery, maps, and other intelligence.
These attacks helped to tilt the war in Iraq’s favour and bring Iran to the negotiating table, and they ensured that the Reagan administration’s long-standing policy of securing an Iraqi victory would succeed. But they were also the last in a series of chemical strikes stretching back several years that the Reagan administration knew about and didn’t disclose.
So not only were we totally hypocritical when dealing with Saddam helping him use WMD that we sold him in the first place, but we started a war of aggression against his country that was not thought out, had no plans for after the invasion, spilled over into sectarian violence and civil war and the formation of terrorist groups where there were none before.
So how many dead people does Blair and Bush have on their hands from their decision to go to war "on faulty intelligence" or as normal people say "illegally"?
How many dead and injured victims have their been over the last 12+ years and the years prior...
Two “Islamic States”, one gets massive arms supplies, Royal visits and ignored when it comes to their human right abuses. Whilst the other gets bombed and denounced as terrorists for doing the same thing in a cruder manner.
Whilst I have no problem admitting these evil ISIS bastards are terrorists. We must remember that we helped create them with our divide and conquer strategy in the Middle East that seems to be for the Greater Israel project.
Keep the enemy fighting amongst themselves whilst Israel expands and Bibi gets standing ovations at Congress for denouncing Iranian bomb making that is based on flimsy evidence at best, on top of a whole lot of lies and ignored data from reputable Atomic inspectors and agencies.
It seems as if the Israeli President is more concerned about a non factual threat from Iran, whilst sitting on a whole pile of nuclear weapons that could destroy the Middle East himself, than the threat of ISIS on his door. Why?
Why would the Israelis who were so concerned about al-Qaeda not feel the threat of ISIS on their borders and concentrate instead on Iranian bomb making.
Here we have 3 Islamic States all being treated differently because of what they CAN do for their allies, and who they are allied to, rather than their actual potential threat to the outside world.
If we had to order the three by the amount of death and evil they have done to the world then Saudi Arabia, Israel’s ally against Iran and funder of terrorism around the world including 9.11 would surely sit at the top and Iran at the bottom.
The Saudi’s practise a form of 18th century Wahhabist Islam that the European Parliament in 2013 labelled as the main source of global terrorism.
This brutal form of anti Shi’ite Islamic brutality has even led to attacks on American citizens on their homeland. In fact entire sections of the 9.11 commission report was blacked out keeping Saudi Arabia’s name from their findings.
“The Saudis deny any role in 9/11, but the CIA in one memo reportedly found “incontrovertible evidence” that Saudi government officials — not just wealthy Saudi hardliners, but high-level diplomats and intelligence officers employed by the kingdom — helped the hijackers both financially and logistically. The intelligence files cited in the report directly implicate the Saudi embassy in Washington and consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks, making 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war.”
“The findings, if confirmed, would back up open-source reporting showing the hijackers had, at a minimum, ties to several Saudi officials and agents while they were preparing for their attacks inside the United States. In fact, they got help from Saudi VIPs from coast to coast.“
This can only be down to the close relationship between ex Saudi US ambassador, Prince Bandar and the Bush clan that prevented the natural course of a post 9.11 war on the real attackers, Saudi Arabia and their white washing from the attacks.
According to the official conspiracy theory, 15 of the hijackers were Saudi, with Saudi financing and Saudi help according to the leaked sections from the 28 full pages of the 800 page 9/11 commission report that were classified due to George W Bush’s say so.
Where 7,200 words once stood in the 9/11 commission report there are now just dots where a huge section related to the involvement of Saudi Arabia in the attacks were laid out.
“A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.”
So why didn't we see Saudi Arabia burned to a crisp rather than two unrelated countries that seemed to only further US and Israeli geopolitical goals?
Could it be the Bandar-Bush close ties or as some say “terrorist network”, that kept Saudi Arabia’s name from the report, despite their deep involvement in the killing of thousands of American citizens.
I keep being reminded of ex Mossad agent, Victor Ostrovsky in his book “By Way of Deception” when he repeats what he was told was the future of Saddam Hussein in the Middle East.
“After the bombing of Libya, our friend Qadhafi is sure to stay out of the picture for some time. Iraq and Saddam Hussein are the next target. We’re starting now to build him up as the big villain. It will take some time, but in the end, there’s no doubt it’ll work.”
“But isn’t Saddam regarded as moderate toward us, allied with Jordan, the big enemy of Iran and Syria?”
“Yes, that’s why I’m opposed to this action. But that’s the directive, and I must follow it. Hopefully, you and I will be done with our little operation before anything big happens. After all, we have already destroyed his nuclear facility, and we are making money by selling hlm technology and equipment through South Africa.”
In the following weeks, more and more discoveries were made regarding the big gun and other elements of the Saddam war machine. The Mossad had all but saturated the intelligence field with information regarding the evil intentions of Saddam the Terrible, banking on the fact that before long, he’d have enough rope to hang himself. It was very clear what the Mossad’s overall goal was. It wanted the West to do its bidding, just as the Americans had in Libya with the bombing of Qadhafi.
After all, Israel didn’t possess carriers and ample air power, and although it was capable of bombing a refugee camp in Tunis, that was not the same.
The Mossad leaders knew that if they could make Saddam appear bad enough and a threat to the Gulf oil supply, of which he’d been the protector up to that point, then the United States and its allies would not let him get away with anything, but would take measures that would all but eliminate his army and his weapons potential, especially if they were led to believe that this might just be their last chance before he went nuclear.
It seems as if the Israeli’s are up to their old tricks again regarding Syria and Iran using proxies such as ISIS to do their fighting for them plus of course the axis of war, the US/UK, who think they can win wars by bombing from planes.
In reality many people think this war from the air is an excuse to supply ISIS with weapons to keep the war going. Numerous papers have reported on this.
We can’t have the war on terror ending too soon can we! Not when the militarisation of our police forces at home isn't yet complete and we still have a few liberties left.
Remember this war on terror was because we had to fight these evil terrorists who hated our freedoms.
Doesn't anyone think it strange we have lost more freedoms in the years since this war started than in any time before. Even when the IRA was at war with us for 30+ years we didn't give up our liberties at home.
It was only with the installation of MI5 mole Tony Blair in the Labour party, who brought it so far into the centre ground that there was hardly any difference between it and the Tories, that we started handing our freedoms over on a plate and misusing them, such as Gordon Brown using anti-terrorism laws to freeze Icelandic money in UK banks after their financial crash.
I think the only left wing party left with any MP’s in the UK parliament is the Green Party who has one! All the rest are pro-war, pro-austerity, pro-US foreign policy and pro-globalist.
So whilst Saudi Arabia is allied with Israel due their common hatred of Iran, the ISIS terrorists that Iran are actually doing the main fighting against along with the Kurds are being built up as the next big bogey man we should attack.
A repeat of Mossads built up of Saddam Hussein as the big bogey man so that their “big brother” could beat it up in the school playground years before.
If ISIS don’t attack Israel with all their weapons, money from oil sales to western companies, supplies from the US/UK and a supposedly rabid fundamentalist approach to Islam then something is very strange!
Either it’s due to factions within Saudi Arabia that are still financing them and commanding them not to disturb their Israeli ally or the Israeli’s have some kind of control over the group.
Even al-Qaeda made repeated calls to annex the evil Zionist state but I have been dearth of hearing anything of that kind from the head of Islamic State, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
Are Mossad following their motto “by way of deception” or is something else going on?
ISIS or "Islamic State" as they call themselves, is as barbaric a group as they come. However the misnomer of the term Islamic State is being used to justify attacks on all Muslims whether they are fundamentalists or moderates.
Not all Muslims are the same just as not all Christians or Jews are. The same goes for Atheists, Buddhists and any other group of people on this planet whether the Daily Mail tells you differently or not.
Whilst ISIS may believe they are an Islamic State or a new Caliphate for the 21st century. Other Islamic States such as Iran and Saudi Arabia are fighting or preparing to fight against them.
Not all Islamic States are the same either whether they put that title in their countries name or not.
There have been many Islamic Caliphates ( Islamic Governments ) throughout history and as with most religions the concept itself is split on tribal lines with Sunnis believing that the leader of any Caliphate should be elected by the Muslim people themselves whilst the Shia's believe that only a direct descendant from Muhammad's family can call himself a leader.
History shows that Islamic Governments who ruled from the Middle East to Europe, North Africa and at one point encompassing half of Spain, had at times more welcoming views to other religions than even the Christian Empires of the time. They allowed Jews and Christians to live amongst them and society was pluralistic as it could be under the circumstances of the age. Not all empires were welcoming but during the "golden age" of Islam the leaders of their lands did nothing to harm people of different belief systems living amongst them.
At one point the Umayyad Caliphate covered 5.17 million square miles, making it the largest empire the world had yet seen, and the fifth-largest ever to exist in history. The Ottoman Empire was Islamic in nature and trade, science and culture flourished throughout Islamic States at various points.
It was never the home to such people as those now calling themselves the new Islamic Caliphate.
However ISIS, just like the Taliban with their fundamentalist nature,believe in a strict interpretation of the Koran, and therefore ban music, dancing, and many modern items which seems to contradict directly their love of social media as a tool to spread their message on YouTube and Facebook. Most importantly pictures of the prophet are banned 100%. We have all witnessed the attacks on journalists who print cartoons of him, and it seems to be the ultimate insult that one can take to many Muslims around the world.
It seems as if these people believe the 7th century was the end of all human advancement in Culture, Science and Ethics.
Most importantly this group of people believe that it is okay to kill any human, whether woman, child or OAP, Christian or Muslim, who doesn't believe in their cruel barbaric form of governance.
You may have seen all the videos, accompanied by beautiful Islamic music, as people in cars film themselves doing drive by shootings on main roads in northern Iraq. Swerving back to ensure the occupants of any vehicle are killed fully and properly and any survivors of their attacks are filmed pleading for their lives before being shot in dug outs or cut to bits with knives and swords. They seem to think this indiscriminate slaughter is a propaganda tool for anyone witnessing it and they seem to be right as many young people flock to the Middle East to join their cause.
Even with all the numerous witnesses and dead victims appearing all over the place people, websites, news stations such as FOX and even forensic analysts are claiming that the recently heavily edited ISIS videos of Jihad John beheading captured journalists and aid workers, and even the burning alive of the captured Syrian pilot, are actually faked or staged.
Why ISIS would need to stage brutal killings when they have proven themselves to be sick murdering bastards by raping young girls and killing opponents by the truck load I don't know.
I have seen videos of whole convoys of trucks carrying captured Iraqi males being driven to a ditch where they are taken and shot. These are in no way heavily edited films and many are shot on phone cameras by the soldiers fighting for ISIS themselves.
However leaving aside any debate on fakery when it comes to beheadings, what I do know is that the rise of ISIS is a foreign policy error of the axis of war, and the US/UK's training and funding of "moderate" anti Assad groups like the Free Syrian Army have not helped one bit.
These groups have shown themselves to be just as barbaric as the rest of the groups fighting in Syria and any funding or training by Qatar, Saudi Arabia or the CIA have just helped to make ISIS into one of the most formidable terrorist groups in histpry.
We can all follow the trail of this conflict back to the "successful" overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya, a country which is now a mess and a huge training base for pro ISIS groups and then to Iraq and Afghanistan and 9.11.
From our intervention in Iraq, which was basically three countries held together by a Western backed dictator, to our war on the Taliban who only asked for some proof of Osama bin-Laden's guilt in the 9.11 attacks, before being denied it and bombed into Halliburton's pockets, the foreign policy decisions of our leaders have either been totally foolish or carefully planned to ensure we have a well equipped army to fight for the next few decades.
We can even go all the way back to the 1st World War and the Balfour Agreement which let Jews immigrate to Palestine in return for US help for Britain in the war, and then the carving up of captured Ottoman Empire holdings into countries that never existed such as Iraq.
Yes our foreign policy is immoral and imbalanced with support for dictators one moment when they serve our purposes and then their overthrow when they stop being useful. To be honest it did seem as if the Middle East was a whole lot calmer when Gaddafi and Hussein were in power.
To go back to the concept of a Caliphate, the whole area from Africa to Iraq and Afghanistan is tribal and localised in nature. These tribes have fought each other for centuries and it was only when their lands were controlled by Caliphate leaders, dictators, and leaders of Western Empire that they seemed to settle and stop their religious and tribal strife.
Take that firm grip away and the old rivalries return unabated.
Personally I have no love for any organised religion and whether it's the break up of the Roman Empire, Henry VIII leaving the Catholic Church and setting up the Church of England so he could get his leg over, or Protestants and Catholics fighting in Ireland, Christians cannot claim to be any less tribal when it comes to irrational belief systems.
One must also remember that Islam is the 3rd branch of the Abrahamic faith.
Please remember that the first books of the old Testament, which allow for the stoning to death of adulterers and other capital punishments for eating shellfish and other stupid laws were at one stage all carried out by Jews, Christians and Muslims.
The fact that Jews are now mostly atheists and Christians have followed their own testament based on the belief that Jesus was the Messiah doesn't take anything away from the core beliefs that all 3 religions once held, and the laws and punishments dealt out for breaking them.
The fact we are not criticising Islamic States like Saudi Arabia for their beheadings whilst attacking the new Islamic State for theirs is total hypocrisy.
Iran's stoning to death of people can be seen on websites along with Iraqi's brutal slaying of rapists in which the whole male community take part in the killing.
Video proof of such "punishments" can all be found on certain "death sites" on the Internet if you want to look hard enough for them.
So whilst we are no way clean when it comes to the rise of ISIS, we should absolutely oppose it for its fundamentalist religious nature.
The fact that I would like Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Taliban to be classed in the same group takes nothing away from the brutality we are facing from this group of 7th century loving killers.
We may have helped stir the pot, and even funded the initial groups who became part of ISIS.
Most definitely the criminal Bandar-Bush enterprise needs it's terrorist tentacles chopping off ASAP.
The close ties between oil rich Saudi Arabia, it's ex ambassador and now terrorist group funding Prince Bandar and the Bush family, whose tarnished history goes way back to Prescott Bush and his Nazi funding days, is long over due some legal oversight.
We have funded Islamic groups to fight Communism and then used them to destabilise countries we wanted to encroach into. The history of our involvement is there for anyone who wants to see it.
One only need research Operation Gladio and Gladio 2 to see why we have allowed these groups to flourish and the benefits we got from allowing them to.
However once again blowback is going to bite the hand that fed it hard and fast.
To get down to basics I don't want to see anymore UK working class men sign up for the Army or RAF to go and fight ISIS.
We have already fought and lost against similar terrorist groups in Afghanistan and Iraq so why keep the military industrial complexes wheels waxed with tax payers money?
Anyway the UK Armed Forces are no match to anyone's anymore due to cuts from Tory and Labour governments. Faced with ISIS captured US anti-aircraft weapons from fleeing Iraqi forces I wouldn't be surprised to see a lot more English people being beheaded by Jihad John or burned alive in cages if we were to return to the killing fields of Iraq and Syria.
We have cut our armed forces to the bare bones. We are certainly not fit for any war worth fighting unless Jersey tried invading Sussex.
Anyway, on a side note, I wonder why Cornwall is Russia's target for "probing"?
It couldn't be anything to do with the huge amount of under-water cables taking Internet and Phone messages across the Atlantic to the USA from Europe could it? Or is it just the western edge of NATO's Europe?
Remember folks if the war in Ukraine actually gets hot between Russia and NATO then China's recent demo of a laser fired into space to destroy a satellite it had "no use for" or in other words, a warning to the USA that they could take down any US satellites they wanted, making the techno dependent US military redundant, will become true. Russia will most certainly do the same.
Russia is well-known to have far superior missiles and rockets than the US and it would be no surprise to see Satellites falling from the skies during the first days of any war.
So whilst some ignorant people may feel that a hot war with Russia over Ukraine and broken promises post Berlin wall are worth going head into, some other fools think that re-sending defeated forces back into Iraq to bomb ISIS from afar will defeat them.
If we want to crush ISIS, and we should, then we should allow the countries most involved to do the fighting. We should also stop funding Nazi's in Kiev and ask Russia to help by arming its proxies in Syria and Iran. With Russian military weapons these two countries could crush them fully without a Western jet being flown.
Jordan is already keen to bomb the hell out of ISIS because of their burned alive pilot, and Iran has been helping the Shia's in Iraq fight ISIS for a long while now.
The Kurds are also well into a hot war at the other end of Iraq and if only we agreed that ISIS was worse for the world than President Assad of Syria then we could allow Syria a free hand to attack from the north.
Why we keep on insisting that President Assad is the real bad guy when there are clearly worse figures about in the area I don't know. We could easily let Syria and Iran with Russian arms squash ISIS in the middle like a cockroach in the night with a heavy shoe.
Then if only we could get Israel who take US arms, de-construct them, and sell them on to Russia and other countries join the fight from the West it would be game over.
I know that sounds like a dream but logically it makes sense. It's just a shame logic pays no part in foreign affairs or Israel's behaviour in the world.
Israel has one of the biggest and most sophisticated armies in the world yet they spend their time either setting up fake al-Qaeda groups to then "catch" or allowing the US to instead. Just like leading a blind and dumb rat to a piece of poisoned cheese.
If only Israel could stop using their military might to crush the cornered and starving people of Gaza and instead realised the threat to their east. Their weaponry would be no match to ISIS if they actually fought them.
However if they are not worried about ISIS then it can only be due to their infiltration of, or setting up of, ISIS networks. Nothing else makes sense.
For the Islamic State, who should in all theory from their previous and past behaviour, hate Jews and Zionists, not try to attack Israel it can only be down to the fact that they are bought and paid for terrorists - like so many al-Qaeda networks before them.
If ISIS do attack Israel then they will have a real enemy to fight for once instead of pretend Iranian nukes and Gazan fire cracker rockets.
They could then join the pincer movement by Assad from the north and the Kurds, and Iraq and Iran from the south to crush this disgusting beast as hard as it likes. They don't even have to hold hands with Iran to do it, they are all neighbours with an unwelcome guest, so they should all want to resolve the problem.
It doesn't matter who created ISIS.
It doesn't matter which Saudi Royals still fund it as their government cries out for help between beheadings every Friday after prayers.
It doesn't matter if ISIS are owned, created or stage-managed actors, they are still scum that need demolishing.
The only thing that matters is that the axis of war doesn't go back into an area they have just left tails dangling between their legs.
If Islamic countries (and hopefully Jewish) can come together in their area of influence to destroy this beast on their own then it will do more for the social cohesion of the Middle East than anything the Western nations have done since World War One when the French and English carved up the lands that created Iraq in the first place.
Let's leave the fighting to the people who have most to lose.
It will be clear to see if ISIS don't attack Israel that something very, very wrong is occurring, and on any account Israel joining Iran to destroy this evil creation can only be a good thing, whether together or by separate means.
Lets just agree to not send anymore of our boys out to these deserts to fight.
