Who owns the Bank of England?
By Dark PolitricksI have updated some quotes seeing that people were disputing them and although many original ones were pretty similar to the source the wording was slightly incorrect. As the old site has closed I have copied and pasted the original comments and posted them at the bottom of the posting. Please add new comments as and when you wish in the normal manner.
Also before you criticize a quote please click the link to view the source and then complain at the site that is based around supposedly true quotes please - Sep 2015
First a few historical comments by people who helped create two of the worlds most famous central banks, the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve.
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men". - Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence
The Bank of England was created in 1694 by a Scotsman William Paterson, a quote by one of the governors of the central bank famously said:
"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing"- Josiah Stamp - Governor of The Bank of EnglandThe history of the Bank of England and how it was taken over by one powerful family hundreds of years ago.
Up until 1946 when it was nationalised the Bank of England was a private run bank that lent money it created out of nothing to the English government and was paid back with interest.
A very famous story relates to the Bank of England and the infamous Rothschilds, that all powerful banking family. This story was re-told recently in a BBC documentary about the creation of money and the Bank of England by none other than the BBC's economics and business editor Robert Peston.
It revolves around the Battle of Waterloo in which Nathan Rothschild used his inside knowledge of the outcome and his faster horses and couriers to play the market by getting the result of the battle before anyone else knew the outcome.
He quickly sold his English bonds and gave all the traders who looked to him for guidance the impression that the French had won at Waterloo.
The other traders all rushed to sell their bonds before the market crashed thinking that they were now worthless and a massive fire-sale occurred as brokers clamored to get rid of their stock.
This massive sell off quickly drove the price of the bonds down to 5% of their original worth.
Once the bottom had dropped out the market Nathan Rothschild then re-bought as many bonds back as he could at hugely discounted prices and in doing so he multiplied his wealth twenty times in 3 days of trading.
At the same time as becoming immensely wealthy he also became the single largest debtor to the English government which ultimately gave him control over the bank of England.
English bonds were a debt guaranteed by future tax revenue of the English government, therefore the taxes the citizens paid were going to pay the 8% interest that the English government had to pay to borrow the money.
As Nathan Rothschild now controlled the majority of the English bonds he could determine the price and therefore the supply of the English currency which gave him great power over the countries finances. As he famously said afterwards.
"Who controls the issuance of money controls the government!" - Nathan RothschildPrivatisation of the bank continued for years until the bank of England was nationalised after the war in 1946.
However because the government was broke after the second world war they didn't have enough money to buy out all the shareholders so instead they were issued with government stocks.
Although the government now earned money from any bank profits they also had to pay interest on any new stock they issued to pay for the shares they couldn't buy back in the first place.
In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called BANK OF ENGLAND NOMINEES LIMITED, a private limited company with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. The objectives of the company are:
“To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”The two shares belong to the bank itself and John Footman who only holds it on behalf of the bank. The directors of this private limited company which is a subsidiary of the bank are John Footman and Andrew Bailey who are both employees of the bank itself.
This company is very special as its protected by the official secrets act, its Royal Charter status and is exempt from the normal disclosure requirements that other companies have to comply with to meet section 27 of the Companies Act 1976.
The reason being is that the major players in the world of finance including the Queen of England and other Royal families use this company to purchase shares and remain anonymous.
However the Bank of England Nominees company accounts are not exempt from any laws regarding companies and they must print their accounts as every company must do which can then be accessed through the Company House website. It is interesting to note however that the latest Bank of England Nominees LTD accounts say that:
"There has been no income or expenditure on the part of the Company since its incorporation and accordingly no profit and loss account is submitted."It still also has total net assets of £2 (the £2 shares).
However even though the Bank of England is now state owned its important to note that up to 97% of the UK's money supply is privately controlled being in the form of interest bearing loans created by the big commercial banks.
The bank holds very little government stock and the Bank's profits primarily come from the issuing of coins and notes for use by high street banks. Therefore it seems the Bank of England has reduced in size and importance over the years and is now mainly a regulatory body that oversees the existing banking system and since the 1997 Labour government it's main role is to control inflation and the base interest rate used by the country.
Referred to as "the lender of last resort" one of it's other main functions as "the bankers bank" is to support banks that get into difficulty such as during the financial melt down of 2008.
On the surface at least it seems that the Bank of England has returned to state control however in America the Federal Reserve is still a privately controlled bank. This comes as a surprise to many people who don't know the history of the preceding US central banks that went before it but were closed down due to worries that the bankers had too much power.
The history of the US banking system has been one in which control of the money supply has alternated between Congress and privately owned banks.
The founding fathers and early presidents of the USA were very much aware of the dangers concerning central banks and they realised that whoever controlled the nations money supply wielded enormous amounts of power.
The founding fathers of the USA wrote about the dangers of central banking extensively.
"[The] Bank of the United States... is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution... An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?" -Thomas Jefferson
"We began planning the Revolutionary War in order to issue our own money again" - Benjamin Franklin
"I sincerely believe... that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale". - Thomas Jefferson
"The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, and more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces as public enemies all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe". - Abraham Lincoln
"Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate". - James GarfieldThe following video takes a look at how after a contrived banking crisis the Federal Reserve came to being during the dead of night in 1913.
Hopefully this short history of two of the worlds most famous central banks shows you that Nathan Rothschild was true when he said that whoever controlled a nations money supplied controlled the nation.
Here are comments from the original site I have copied across:
30 Responses
Continuing the Discussion
- uberVU - social comments linked to this post on January 26, 2010
Social comments and analytics for this post…This post was mentioned on Twitter by darkpolitricks: New article on darkpolitricks: Who owns the Bank of England http://bit.ly/6WU8rO #Money #History #FED… - Liberty 09/22/2013 (a.m.) | Liberty in the Breach linked to this post on September 22, 2013
[…] Who owns the Bank of England? |Dark Politricks […] - C of E National Bank? Yes, but will they charge Usury? | Thewhitechrist's Weblog linked to this poston September 29, 2013
join the dots…
GOD HELP US ALL….
peace
Firstly, the Rothschilds didn’t make huge sums on the back of the Battle of Waterloo. When access was granted to their archives, it showed that the Rothschilds had contracted to supply gold to Wellington’s army, and had gambled on a protracted campaign. Since the battle was over quickly, the Rothschilds had to sell their gold at a substantial loss. Some bond dealing on the day mitigated their losses but they basically ended up even.
Secondly, Nathan Rothschild never said the “I care not what puppet” quote. It’s a complete fabrication.
If people want to hate Jews then fine, go and hate them, but at least try and be honest.
The only secrets are the BOE nominees, e.g what they invest in through that mechanism.
There is a video on You Tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8irQifrpmEY in which Norman Dodd, an extremely experienced 82 year old ‘accountant,’ investigating US tax exempt foundations in the 1920′s and 30′s discovered that they the board members of these foundations, Rockefeller, Carnegie etc had worked out long ago that the most profitable event for them was war so, with profit in mind, they should endeavour, with all their considerable energies, to find the most effective way of making sure there always was one and also, through the state education system, how the citizens would learn both to accept and expect them. That’s capitalism for you and the banks own capitalism. In the end its just the bottom line. War makes the most money and also the most debt and so illicits the most control. Therefore…. welcome to the military industrial complex.
Standard journalism is a complete nonsense, points made earlier about the Associated Press and Reuters are true. Whatever means the Bank of England or its board of members are using to control the monetary system in this country its as obviously fixed as it is across the world by FED subsidiaries: World Bank, IMF, BIS, ECB, WTO, Goldman, Chase, Morgan etc. Countries everywhere are still paying for wars started by the CIA, MI5, Mossad and other ‘government agencies’ long ago it has been going on for hundreds of years. SS Maine, Lusitania, SS Madox, even Hitler funded by Prescott Bush with brother of Paul (father of the FED) Max Warburg running IG Fabern. If the Versailles Treaty and the armistice falling on the 11/11/11 (bankers number for judgement and destruction; 9/11, 7/7 7×11) is a coincidence considering it was also signed at the Rothschild’s house then the odds against must be 16 000 000 000 000: 1 which, by another incredible coincidence, is the current debt the US people owe to the FED.
Get rid of the bankers or they’ll get rid of you; standard rules of financial competition apply. Its the only way.
Yes war is a racket.
Yes the CIA is the army Capitalism uses to further US corportations influence and they have a black budget funded by drug running so they don’t have to ask Congress for money. If you have time read this 4 part series on the history of CIA drug running > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/cia-involvement-in-drug-smuggling-part-1/
It also explains why some people saw planes and others didn’t as well as showing how witnesses who came out were threatened to keep quiet by the government