Why Julian Assange should be granted asylum by Ecuador

By Dark Politricks

This episode of "The World Tomorrow" is the final show in the Russia Today series of interviews Julian Assange has been carrying out over the last couple of months.

He has interviewed everyone from Presidents, revolutionary leaders from the Arab Spring and Occupy Movement to intellectuals and "terrorist" leaders and if you have missed any of the shows you can watch them on my main site darkpolitricks.com/tag/the-world-tomorrow/

Lets all cross our fingers and hope Ecuador gives Julian Assange political asylum.

Rafael Correa, the President of that Ecuador was one of Julian's interviewees and the two seemed to get on really well so he may have more than an average chance of gaining asylum.

Add to this relationship the leftist group of Southern American nations, of which Ecuador is one, dislike of American Imperialism as they see it and they may just give him asylum to stick two fingers up to the empire.

However even if he and President Rafael Correa aren't the best of buddies there are many reasons why any country should give Julian Assange asylum including:

• The USA uses Torture - a breach of international law
• US prisons are hell holes full of male rape, drugs, violence and murder. Julian would not last very long in a US high security prison.
• The USA executes people for certain crimes. We don't do that in Europe. We have a modicum of human rights even though they are being constantly downgraded as I speak.
• The USA has thrown away the rule book and has decided it and it alone can be the arbitrary decider of which country is "moral" whilst attacking those it dislikes. There is no other reason why it sucks the cock of Saudi Arabia one of the most repressive and backward regimes in the world, selling it weaponry and buying it's oil whilst it boycotts Iranian oil, attacks Syria for defending it's own country from al-Qaeda terrorists and attacks China for human rights violations whilst carrying out many of the same violations itself.
• The US military have basically tortured a US soldier Bradley Manning to get information on Julian Assange so that he can be tried under their espionage act. Something that doesn't apply to him seeing that he is not an American citizen or was in the US when the documents were obtained.
• Julian Assange is a whistle blower that has broken many stories that the US should be protecting him for doing so. Under their own legal system whistle blowers are supposed to be accorded protection but this attack on Julian Assange, WikiLeaks and other whistle blowers shows this to be nothing more than fiction. WikiLeaks has shown the US military at it's worst - massacring Iraqi civilians, releasing documents that shows the USA has no regard for international treaties by it's desire to bug UN delegates as well as many other documents that show the USA's duplicity and illegality in world affairs.
• The USA is using all the political pressure it can to ensure Julian Assange ends up in an orange jumpsuit. I hope he doesn't.
• It is a shocking indictment on the West - supposed upholder of human rights and liberty that the only places that Julian Assange can get asylum are South American leftist countries like Ecuador or Venezuela or even maybe Cuba. 

Why is it that no European country that supposedly stands for liberty, free speech and the rule of law has offered Julian asylum? 

It would be interesting to see what would happen if Russia or China offered it to him as well as the Americans response to it. I only hope that they grow a pair and do so along with many other western countries.

As for the "The World Tomorrow" show on Russia Today this is the last show in the series.

In show ten Julian Assange speaks to the leader of the Malaysian opposition - Anwar Ibrahim. As a rising internal rival to the former Prime Minister Mahathir, Anwar was imprisoned for 5 years after being smeared with sex allegations including sodomy.

As a result of a popular campaign in 2004, his conviction was overturned and he was released from prison.

In 2008, he was again targeted for sex crimes allegations, he won the case earlier this year.

With elections looming with Anwar tipped to win, he has now been charged with unauthorised assembly. If found convicted, he will be prevented from running. Julian Assange talks to him about how he has survived and what he sees as the future of Asia and the West.

 

If you've missed the previous episodes, you can always watch them on my main site www.darkpolitricks.com under the tag "The World Tomorrow" or you can visit Julian's own site for the TV show at http://assange.RT.com.

Whether you love him, hate him, think he's a useful idiot or an Israeli tool you should respect Julian's right to free speech and the fact he has blown the whistle on a number of major American atrocities and international crimes. For that he should not be punished but applauded.

Free Speech Will Die With Julian Assange

Free Speech is Dead but will we allow ourselves to witness the USA murder Julian Assange?

By Dark Politricks

It has been obvious for years now that true free speech is dead in the Western supposedly "free world". However the case of Julian Assange is one that all the mainstream papers who published his work, and profited from it whilst Wikileaks itself did not, seem to have forgotten the importance of his case for all journalists, legacy and alternative. 

Julian Assange before he was tortured by the UK

Julian has been slowly tortured through years of solitary confinement in Belmarsh prison and before that within the Ecuadorian embassy, where the CIA and MI6 plotted to kill him lest anyone forget. 

If he is sent to the USA who want to lock him up for over 175 years, he will surely die. If he is locked up in a supermax prison he will probably be Epstein'd off, shanked in the showers by a CIA paid prisoner with nothing to lose, commit suicide, or even be executed. 

His trial under the ancient Espionage Act means he has no right to claim the public had a right to see the war crimes committed by the USA they claim he and Chelsea Manning hacked US computers to obtain. He is being charged using a fraudulent FBI case that relied on a compromised witness who lied in his testimony about Assange doing any sort of actual hacking which the US still claims he did. Quote:

A major witness in the United States’ Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to fabricating key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks founder. The witness, who has a documented history with sociopathy and has received several convictions for sexual abuse of minors and wide-ranging financial fraud, made the admission in a newly published interview in Stundin where he also confessed to having continued his crime spree whilst working with the Department of Justice and FBI and receiving a promise of immunity from prosecution.

You can read my full article here about the fraudulent witness the FBI relied on to make their case about Assange actually hacking US computers to get the information with Chelsea Manning.

To see all my previous articles I have created here, or imported since I got removed from my older bigger site, you can use my new search bar to search for "Julian Assange". 

If you want to see all the articles I had on my old site you will need to use the Wayback Machine, It is quite a trip down memory lane to see all the articles I had back then, for if any long time reader remembers, it was Wikileaks release of the snuff video of the US helicopter murder of Reuters reporters on the ground in Iraq that started the rage in me that got me first writing Dark Politricks. 

However that article is not available here or even on the Wayback machine it seems, not that I can find anyway, it seems the authorities have even tried cleaning my old site on the never go away Internet site itself. An unusually large no of articles related to Assange and Manning are 404 Not Found - or claimed to have never been indexed at all. Very suspicious. 

However you can see watch that infamous video with commentary from Assange below.

Remember if you ever find videos on here, maybe from RT.com, or others just blocked with a "This video is not available in your country", to use a VPN to get around the block. It is good to see the Brave browser search bar is not blocking Russia Today anymore, whilst other search engines still hide the site. I have found using Belarus the best country to get RT content which was banned at the start of the Russian Special Military Operation in Ukraine. If you cannot afford to pay for a VPN, Bitdefender allows you up to 200MB of free traffic over their servers per day. Another choice is Proton VPN, which offers some free server locations around the world.

If you have forgotten Julian gave an impassioned speech when he was still allowed to seek asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy that you can read in full here. 

"The United States must pledge before the world that it will not pursue journalists for shining a light on the secret crimes of the powerful."

"There must be no more foolish talk about prosecuting any media organization, be it WikiLeaks or be it the New York Times."

The New York Times, once a bastion of free speech who often printed Wikileaks material as well as information from the Snowden files, is now nothing more than an establishment paper pushing CIA intelligence. Is not making any comments about the possibility of Julian Assange being extradited to the USA from the UK despite publishing the same material Wikileaks published.

It does not matter if you are a paid journalist working for one of these big papers or a blogger like me exposing more information that the mainstream media won't go near, such as pro Palestinian news, and the news you don't hear from the Russian Ukrainian war. 

If we let the murder of Julian Assange go ahead it will shake fear into many journalists bellies making them self censor what they write, scared of the same possible treatment.

We cannot let the murder of Julian Assange by the combined intelligence services of the UK and USA go ahead. 

Free speech may have died in the UK long ago, and in the USA no-one is sticking up for their constitutional rights, letting the Government expand the massive US Security state, step by step, making the Constitution irrelevant. If you don't protect it, the Government and the permanent security state will take it away, and that's what is happening in America right now. 

If you are American and believe in your Constitution then you should be protesting the extradition of Julian Assange as well all these new extensions to the FISA court and expansion of NSA surveillance on US citizens. 

The death of Julian Assange will just be the final nail in the coffin.

I hope the UK judges have not had closed ears since the last appeal where the FBI's lies about Julian Assange were used to let his case proceed forward. One of the judges is an existing attorney that helps the UK security services and really should have been recused, but she has stayed sitting.

It is not a good sign when the Judges deciding your fate probably hate you and your website for allowing intelligence to be aired, that whilst in the public interest, was not in the interest of the Security State they themselves work for.

Lets pray for a Tory Home Secretary to have the balls Teressa May did when preventing the extradition of Gary McKinnon to the USA over his UFO hacking due to health issues.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 Dark Politricks

Why Julian Assange Should Be Pardoned

Ryan Grim Breaks Down Why Julian Assange Should Not Be Prosecuted

By Dark Politricks

Julian Assange just spent his 50th birthday in Belmarsh prison. The prison in the UK that high security prisoners are stored and abused, nicknamed "The Meat Grinder". He should not be there, and although I disagree with a lot of what Ryan Grim has to say, this piece he did on The Hill really breaks down what he is accused of, and why he should not be prosecuted.

The USA under Joe Biden is carrying on the savage torture of this journalist, by carrying on to appeal the Judges ruling that he should not be extradited to the US due to their inhuman conditions for prisoners. The Judge even mentioning the case of sex offender Jeffery Epstein, and the likelihood Assange would die in a US Super Max prison. The US has come back to say that if convicted in their show trial, he would not go to a Super Max prison to spend the next 300 years or whatever stupid sentence they are going to try for.

However once extradited there is nothing stopping them from breaking any promises they had made to the UK court and putting him in solitary, in a tiny box cell, with little human contact. The no of times the US has lied in extradition cases is huge, they will and do say anything to get their prisoner back to their country, where they can then do what they like with him.

It seems that despite the FBI's main witness coming out and telling the truth about the lies he told to get off charges himself related to child molesting and fraud by lying about Assange in an Icelandic Newspaper, that I printed in my last article, the US is still carrying on their charade of a prosecution. They are labelling him a hacker when the only evidence comes from Mr Thordason, who has admitted he lied to the FBI about nearly all the involvement he had with Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.

Therefore if you remove his testimony, Julian has not been proven to have hacked anything. All the evidence comes from the lying words of a 28 FBI informant from Iceland trying to get out of being taken to court for his own crimes. Take away this evidence and the FBI and DOJ basically have no evidence to convict Assange.

Read more about Mr Thordarson and Julian Assange and his interview, in which he admitted he was lying to the FBI. This is something that should have helped get the US DOJ's case against Assange, thrown out of court, but somehow it persists. 

This all goes to prove that the handling of Assange is more about punishing him for revealing US secrets, which journalists have been doing for time immemorial, and making him suffer rather than the actual law. Julian Assange has being denied bail, and the US carrying on trying to lie about him being a hacker rather than a journalist who did what the Guardian and New York Times also did, print materials he was given, not material he hacked and stole illegally.

The indictment states that together Mr Thordarson and Julian Assange tried to crack a password together to get into an Icelandic bank. This bank was assumed to contain information about defaulted loans provided by the Icelandic Landsbank during the 2008 banking crisis. In fact Mr Thordason already had access to this information with his own login, whether they shared that login is immaterial and outside the FBI's jurisdiction as it was in Iceland.

Julian Assange like any good journalist wanted information, and when asked what information he should get, Assange actually said "I can't give targets around for legal reasons, but Google around and find bad people". This is evidence that he was trying to keep inside the bounds of the law not break them.

All Assange is, was a publisher of information that was given to him by whistle-blowers. The same information that was printed by multiple papers around the globe. The DOJ have the problem of how to prosecute Assange without stopping free speech and the printing of information by the New York Times obtained illegally but publicly important to reveal if it is about government crimes. This is why they are trying to accuse him of being a hacker. Once you listen to the video you will hear how thin this prosecution against Assange really is.

Many people believe that this grudge against Assange relates to the emails leaked during the 2016 US election from Hillary Clinton. It doesn't, it relates to the war crimes committed by the US army in Iraq, and torture information from GITMO gathered by Chelsea Manning who has already been to jail for her crimes. 

This information was very embarrassing for the US as it revealed their cruel methods of killing Iraqi's, including Reuters reporters filmed from US helicopters as they joked about killing a number of men and even children that arrived in an "ambulance" to help them.

So listen to this short news piece as Ryan Grim breaks down the DOJ's indictment against Julian Assange. 

To read more about Mr Thordarson, and his lies, including claiming that he was a top figure at WikiLeaks and all the incriminating things he said about Assange to his FBI handlers, you can read the article in which he comes clean here > The Lying FBI Informant Trying To Imprison Julian Assange.

Julian Assange's family have just finished a tour of the US to try and raise awareness about his trial, the evidence, and the treatment he is suffering in Belmarsh jail at the moment. I doubt many MSM news channels gave them a positive light, considering they are all now Operation Mockingbird outlets, fully formed in the flesh, with real ex intelligence officers as news anchors, or guest presenters, along with all the adverts for the MIC, including Raytheon and Lockheed and Martin, during their breaks. These deep state entities control the MSM in the US now and it is the reason you cannot get real news from their shows.

They no longer need to sneak about ,and offer secret tax free salaries, as the MI5 does here in the UK to BBC reporters, as attested to in John Snows autobiography. 

Instead they are now funding, advertising on, and reporting the news themselves. You are unlikely to find an unpopular view that goes against the establishment line being uttered by any guest, and if it is, they won't be invited back for sure. 

So many popular commentators and journalists like Glenn Greenwald, Max Blumenthal and many others no longer appear on supposed left wing news channels like MSNBC. Instead they have to go to the right wing FOX, and use Tucker Carlson, as I write about in this article, to get their news out. For this they are smeared by left wing purists as being Right Wing.

Why is it that to get to the truth you have to get labelled crazy first, a conspiracy theorist or a nutter, before finally the truth is revealed and then everyone treats it as if it has always been so. On another matter related to news not getting out to the public.

Even the American DOD, is now admitting UFO's are real, despite their highly redacted report released recently. The top secret part was left out, with only Congress getting the full 700 page version to look at.

“The government has formally and officially come out and informed Congress that these things are – A, they’re real – and two, that they’re not ours and that they seem to be performing, at least some of them … in remarkable ways," 

Even the head of Lockeheed Martin Skunkworks, designer of the Stealth bomber and many other secret planes for the US, said before his death:

“We now have the technology to take ET home. No, it won’t take someone’s lifetime to do it. There is an error in the equations. We know what it is. We now have the capability to travel to the stars.”

and

“We already have the means to travel among the stars but these technologies are locked up in Black Projects…and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do.” - Ben Rich, Former Director of Lockheed Skunk works shortly before his passing. You can read that quote and more here.

Ex President's are admitting that something strange is going on in the skies, and scientists who have heard the news are having to re-adjust their thinking to a new paradigm due to this new evidence, a fact now admitted by the Government that UFO's or UAP's as the US DOD is calling them, really do exist. Something they and many others in authority and science fields have mocked people for believing in, for years. 

Their whole world of physics should be changing right now, but how many scientists are actually aware of all this new information?

However, for most people the world just seems to carry on spinning, with hardly any news on this matter having being heard by them. They still think UFO's are a conspiracy theory, despite all the new disclosure by the US Government, Navy, Pentagon and DOD. 

UAP's as the US GOV calls them, have been tracked by Naval ships, and videos that were released by the Pentagon to the public, have been online for years now. Even interviews with pilots who have been allowed to be interviewed about their experiences after chasing UAP's, such Commander David Fravor, who chased what has become known as the "Tic Tac", abound on YouTube if you look for them.

So just like Julian Assange and the threat his prosecution poses to all journalists and leakers of classified information, news that "we can take ET home", does not even make the news or get to the public.

Hopefully the video by Ryan Grim clarifies some things up for those not totally clued up to the injustice being inflicted on this centuries most prolific journalist and founder of WikiLeaks. 

Whether anything will get the UK judge to look into the false claims by the FBI's informant / child molesting fraudster is another matter altogether. Appeal courts do not necessarily look at new evidence, so it is debatable whether they can get this important information to the Judge so they know the FBI's case is based on lies.

If the news that UFO's are real has not hit the heads of most of the population, then what will it take to get this important news about the threat to our free speech, and our right to know what the government does with our tax money, and Julian Assange's torture, out to the people?

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks

Ecuador grants Julian Assange asylum but the UK threatens to storm the embassy and take him forcibly

By Dark Politricks

So if you haven't heard yet Ecuador after months of waiting has finally offered Julian Assange asylum.

From the BBC site:

Ecuador has granted asylum to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange two months after he took refuge in its London embassy while fighting extradition from the UK.

It cited fears that Mr Assange's human rights might be violated. Foreign Secretary William Hague said the UK would not allow Mr Assange's safe passage out of the country.

This comes after threats from the UK government that they would forcibly enter the embassy, breaking all international norms and arrest Julian whether he was on Ecuadorian soil or not.

Yes we have sent the SAS into the Iranian embassy before but this was after a hostage situation.

Not to arrest a man who is blatantly being set-up to be extradited to Sweden just so he can be passed to the USA and spend the rest of his life in an orange jumpsuit or even tied to a gurney as some US commentators have wished.

Remember this is a man who the Swedish police want to "question" on allegations that he had sex with two women on consecutive nights and didn't wear a condom. If it was rape, and the women really didn't want him to have sex without a condom then it would be rape he would be getting questioned on and not these weird charges that seemingly only exist in Sweden.

Instead it looks like a Prima facia case of two women scorned once they found out they were not the only Swedish women in Julian's life.

I wonder how they will feel if they see their once idol being sent down for life in a US court room all because they couldn't handle the fact he had sex with another woman.

The Swedish police have been offered numerous chances to either interview Julian over the phone or come to the Ecuadorian embassy to interview him in person but they have turned them all down.

This only makes me thing the true purposes of their wish to interview him on Swedish soil is nothing more than a ruse to then pass him off to their US masters.

I used to think Sweden was a pretty liberal country but then so was Holland before they started shutting down the coffee shops to non Dutch people and going big time on the Islamophobia.

Whether you like Julian Assange or WikiLeaks or not you have to admire his guts for sticking two fingers up to the establishment and for Ecuador doing the same.

How they will manage to get Julian Assange out the county though is another matter. ]

As soon as he walks out the door I reckon a dozen of London's finest truncheon wielding, women beating, minority beating, protester killing, stun gun firing cops will be on top of him in an instant.

Maybe a helicopter on the roof with a transfer to a plane off the coast is the only option.

Any shooting down of such a helicopter will cause havoc and be treated as a sign of war and I wouldn't be surpised if Argentina weighed in on the Falkland Island issue which has boiled up again.

Latin America is no longer the USA's playground and they have the balls to say what they want when they want and from the granting of aslyum to Julian Assange doing what they want as well.

Why we are going full out to capture a man who has revealed the massacring of civilians in Iraq, the illegal bugging of UN delegates by US officials as well as numerous other illegal activities in the #Cablegate release I don't know.

It sure puts an end to our respect for "human rights" and our supposed protection for whistle blowers when we know what is going to happen to Julian.

All the time we bleat on about human rights abuses in Syria we support and fund al-Qaeda on the one hand and supposedly fight them on the other all the way from Afghanistan, Kosovo, Libya and now Syria.

Our hypocrisy on human rights and our phony war on terror knows no limits.

Our world is upside down at the moment and our support for terrorism in one country whilst we ignore human rights abuses in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia along with our own silencing of voices who speak truth to power is a sign of the times we are living in.

I just hope Julian manages to make it out the country without being shot or tasered first.

The UK Is Becoming More Despotic Every Day

CIA Wanted To Assassinate Julian Assange Whilst In the Ecuadorian Embassy

By Dark Politricks

Hopefully by now you have read about the CIA's plans to assassinate Julian Assange in a shoot out at the Ecuadorian Embassy when he was holed up there in his 5th year.

An investigation revealed the CIA planned to abduct, kidnap, or assassinate WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and senior officials inside the CIA asked for "sketches" or "options" to be drawn up as to how these acts could be carried out on Assange.

Lest I remind you that the FBI's whole case is based on the lies of a witness who pretended he was a high up WikiLeaks worker when in fact he was a fraudster and child molester.

A Yahoo News investigation has discovered that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had plans to kidnap and assassinate Julian Assange while he was held up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in early 2017. It was his fifth straight year there as Wikileaks continued to reveal crimes against humanity by several governments and, or often in collusion with, big powerful multinational corporations.

Some National Security Council officials worried that the CIA’s proposals to kidnap Assange would not only be illegal but also might jeopardize the prosecution of the WikiLeaks founder. Concerned the CIA’s plans would derail a potential criminal case, the Justice Department expedited the drafting of charges against Assange to ensure that they were in place if he were brought to the United States.

In late 2017, in the midst of the debate over kidnapping and other extreme measures, the agency’s plans were upended when U.S. officials picked up what they viewed as alarming reports that Russian intelligence operatives were preparing to sneak Assange out of the United Kingdom and spirit him away to Moscow.

The intelligence reporting about a possible breakout was viewed as credible at the highest levels of the U.S. government. At the time, Ecuadorian officials had begun efforts to grant Assange diplomatic status as part of a scheme to give him cover to leave the embassy and fly to Moscow to serve in the country’s Russian mission.

In response, the CIA and the White House began preparing for a number of scenarios to foil Assange’s Russian departure plans, according to three former officials. 

Those included potential gun battles with Kremlin operatives on the streets of London, crashing a car into a Russian diplomatic vehicle transporting Assange and then grabbing him, and shooting out the tires of a Russian plane carrying Assange before it could take off for Moscow. 

You can watch this news expose on the Yahoo investigation here, or on YouTube at The Hill.

The most important part I want you to note is that, U.S. officials asked their British counterparts to do the shooting if gunfire was required, and the British agreed, according to a former senior administration official. 

This means the British Tory Government was prepared to break international law, and almost cause a potential war with Russia by acting for the Americans in shooting at Russian Diplomatic vehicles and planes. 

Who can wonder what would have happened if this had occurred but it worries me greatly that the UK is now so despotic that it would even consider helping the USA in such a plan.

We no longer have most of our civil liberties due to the COVID law that was meant to stay on the books for just 2 years. Boris has already extended them until September and hasn't ruled out extending them again.  Lest I remind you I warned you of this 2 years ago when they were implemented and recently again, they are the greatest loss of civil rights and liberty since WWII.

The new Police Bill the Tories are passing will ban protests that the police deem "too loud". Protests are naturally loud. Without them many people would not even know was going on in this country, despite the MSM labelling protesters as anti-vaxers when they are in fact against 2 tier society based on vaccine passports and mandated vaccination which have now proved to be almost useless due to the anti-bodies not lasting long enough, or protecting against variants of the virus. 

You only need to look at Israel one of the highest vaccinated countries on earth who just recorded their highest no of COVID infections since the peak of their 3rd wave to see how the vaccines are not working. They are now mandating 3 shots and then probably 4 and then monthly all due to the anti-bodies not lasting long enough compared to natural immunity. 

We should be working on vaccines properly such as those that cured Polio, and we have as children for Mumps that keep the anti-bodies longer throughout our lifetime however this takes time and Big Pharma cannot wait to make more money. 

What's more important to them, make billions more now by getting countries to buy more products and mandate more shots or spend money and time working on a proper vaccine cure with long term trials and testing for this virus.

The Tories plan to make it illegal for journalists, bloggers, anyone to report on illegal activity carried out by the British State, I guess this would include the Yahoo news investigation on the plans to have a shoot out with Russian agents on the streets of London all to help an ally assassinate a journalist who has never been proved wrong once and is being tortured slowly in a High Max prison at Belmarsh when he should be on bail.

This country is turning into something I really do not like the look of. If you are planning on having children I would seriously look around and take a look at what our country is becoming. Not only do we protect al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria from being exterminated by Russian and Syrian forces but we plot and plan constantly against Russia whilst accusing them of doing the same sort of activities that we are doing ourselves. 

We are looking more and more like China every day, and soon as possible we will be implementing Chinese style Social Credit systems on the populace to keep us in check.

Soon there will be no skilled manual jobs as AI and Robotics take over from human labour. Automatic driving vehicles and drones to deliver packages and fast food. There will be less need for people to work skilled jobs and the jobs that you used to need a degree for will all be home based solitary activities where you communicate with workers by ZOOM and have little social interaction. 

This is part of the Governments aim to reduce CO2 emissions by preventing people from driving to and from work. 

Do you really want to spend your life working in solitude with no social interaction?

It's what made me leave my last job as it was just so unfulfilling but bosses will save money from renting office space and care little about employees mental health when they can make more money for themselves.

Soon towns will become desolate areas with one big Amazon depot in the middle, auto driving lorries delivering and transporting goods, drones flying in and out and the only jobs will be gig work for people who get sacked by text message when they can't deliver food for people in time due to petrol shortages at garages caused by the lack of foresight from our government.

I just think our country is going down hill and this latest story about willing to almost start WWIII over killing a journalist is just too much for me to stand.

Please leave your comments about the state of the UK below. I would be interested to know what you think about it.

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks

Is Julian Assange just a criminal on the run or a hero?

Is Julian Assange a hero or a rapist trying to avoid justice

By Dark Politricks

After the much awaited speech given from the balcony of the very unluxurious Ecuadorian embassy by Julian Assange the other day the whole world is debating the question - "Is Julian Assange a hero or a rapist trying to avoid justice".

The text of the speech in full is at the bottom of the page but it has led commentators all around the world to denounce Julian Assange as just a sex offender trying to avoid justice whilst totally ignoring the rest of the relevant pieces surrounding his case.

Quotes about the speech:

"what was much more serious - the elephant in the room, so to speak - was Assange's wilful failure to say anything about the actual reason that the Swedish police want to question him." - Andy McSmith - The Independent.

"Odious Julian Assange loved every second of his pompous balcony rant. His speech was long on egotistical claptrap, but oddly failed to mention what this extradition case is actually about — the rape of one woman and sexual molestation of another." - The Sun

"Not since the Argentines invaded the Falklands has Britain had its tail so humiliatingly tweaked by a Latin American dictatorship. Suddenly, Ecuador is on the lips of people who previously would have struggled to find it on a map. All this merry mayhem is, of course, being orchestrated by Assange, who continues to play the British governing class for suckers." - Melanie Phillips - Daily Mail

"He's not going anywhere"' Metropolitan police officer.

In fact you would be hard pressed to find many mainstream media commentators giving a good word to Julian who is facing sexual assault charges - charges that the Ecuadorian President said the other day do not even exist on his countries law books - like many others.

Charges that relate to two WikiLeak "groupies" who had sex with Assange on consecutive nights and allowed him to have sex without a condom. They may have protested about that last bit once they found out about each other but not before and it seems a strange law to charge someone on in the first place. If we were arresting every man in the world who didn't like wearing a condom when having sex there would be very few men left.

However it seems these constitute crimes in Sweden and many people ask why Julian doesn't just go and face his accusers.

The answer is simple.

He is very, very afraid that the Swedes will pass him along to the the American's who are literally frothing at the mouth at the damage he has done to their national security. First by realising tapes of their pilots cheering as they massacred a crowd of reporters and men without guns in Iraq and then the WikiLeaks release of the #Cablegate stash of US embassy emails which have made many a Middle Eastern nation look like two faced liars who say one thing in public and another to their neighbours in private.

More worryingly for Assange is the way that the presumed source of the information a Private Bradley Manning has been treated by the US military. He has been stripped naked, held in a cell for many months without anything to do and basically treated in the most horrible way possible - some even claim this constitutes torture.

He is now facing a charge of possible death or life imprisonment (if prosecutors keep their word)  for communicating national defense information to an unauthorized source and aiding the enemy. His chances do not look good.

Therefore as the UK does not extradite to countries where there is  the possibility of the death penalty and a multitude of US commentators and government employees have stated that he deserves two in the head. It is no wonder Julian is afraid of going to Sweden as he honestly believes it is a ruse to get him sent to the USA.

As no charges have actually been laid out against Assange and the Swedish police only want to "question him" it seems far fetched that in this day and age a compromise could not be made out which allowed for this questioning.

Over a hundred years ago there was this amazing invention called the telephone that allowed people at far distance from each other to communicate by voice.

In the last twenty years we have had Skype, Video Conferencing, Messenger and other tools that would allow for a full face to face interview that could be recorded, analysed and allow the Swedish police to ask their questions without any expensive plane travel.

But why should Julian Assange get special treatment you might ask.

Well he shouldn't and the the same rules should apply to all European citizens.

The European Arrest Warrant is a joke that allows Brits to be dragged from their beds and sent of to Eastern European jails on the say so of a Polish or Greek police commander.

Just like the unfair and unbalanced UK to USA extradition treaty. Which can see British people carted off to spend long time in orange jumpsuits without any evidence being examined in a UK court first as a US citizen has the right to before extradition here. Both of these extradition treaties should be abolished ASAP.

Therefore I don't say that Julian is just trying to avoid spurious charges that only emerged after each woman found out about the other but I say that he is blatantly scared shitless of being sent to the USA.

Also as I predicted in my last article the whole of South America is now standing in unison behind Ecuador after the British threat to storm their embassy which has only increased tension with a region that we are already having difficulty with.

From the  BBC news website.

The Union of South American Nations said it backed Ecuador after Mr Assange publicly thanked it and other South American countries for their support.

A document agreed at the Union of South American Nations meeting said it supported the country "in the face of the threat" to its London embassy.

.. in the context of the UK's perceived heavy-handed approach to the recent question of Argentina's renewed claim over the Falkland Islands - the British government's reputation in South America was undoubtedly being affected by this stand-off.

As I predicted - the fact that a country with a far from clean human rights history is making supposed western liberal and free countries look like despotic dangers to world civility is a stain on our own moral standing across the world. Plus it has swelled the chest of Latin and South America to extreme proportions.

If the Brits storm the embassy they will look like criminals in the eyes of many countries - fairly or not and if they let Julian hop onto a plane to Ecuador they will look like sops in the eyes of the USA and a million Daily Mail readers eyes.

The best thing would be to come to a compromise as suggested by Ecuador's President Rafael Correa who suggested Mr Assange could co-operate with Sweden but only if assurances were given that there would be no extradition to a third country. Any breaking of such an agreement would make the USA look like the "great Satan" Iran always claims they are and it would allow Julian to fulfill his obligations to face Swedish police questions and possible charges.

Whatever happens it looks like a farce from both sides of the argument.

Here is the full text of Julian Assange's speech:

I am here today because I cannot be there with you today, but thank you for coming. Thank you for your resolve, your generosity and spirit.

On Wednesday night, after a threat was sent to this embassy, and police descended on this building, you came out in the middle of the night to watch over it, and you brought the world’s eyes with you.

Inside the embassy, after dark, I could hear teams of police swarming up into the building through the internal fire escape. But I knew that there would be witnesses and that is because of you.

If the UK did not throw away the Vienna Conventions the other night, it is because the world was watching and the world was watching because you were watching.

The next time somebody tells you that it is pointless to defend those rights we hold dear, remind them of your vigil in the dark before the embassy of Ecuador. Remind them how in the morning the sun came up on a different world, and a courageous Latin American nation took a stand for justice.

And so, to those brave people, I thank President Correa for the courage he has shown in considering and in granting me political asylum. And I also thank the government, and the particular Foreign Minister, Ricardo Patino, who have upheld the Ecuadorian Constitution and its notion of universal citizenship in their consideration of my asylum

And to the Ecuadorian people for supporting and defending this Constitution. And I also have a debt of gratitude to the staff of the embassy, whose families live in London, and who have been showing me hospitality and kindness despite the threats we’ve all received.

This Friday there will be an emergency meeting of the foreign ministers of Latin America in Washington, DC, to address this very situation. And so I am grateful to those people and governments of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Venezuela and to all other Latin American countries who have come out to defend the right to asylum.

To the people of the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden and Australia, who have supported me in strength, even when their governments have not. And to those wiser heads in government who are still fighting for justice. Your day will come.

To the staff, supporters and sources of WikiLeaks, whose courage and commitment and loyalty has seen no equal.

To my family and to my children, who have been denied their father. Forgive me. We will be reunited soon.

As WikiLeaks stands under threat, so does the freedom of expression, and the health of our societies. We must use this moment to articulate the choice that is before the government of the United States of America.

Will it return to and reaffirm the revolutionary values it was founded on? Or will it lurch off the precipice, dragging us all into a dangerous and oppressive world, in which journalists fall silent under the fear of prosecution and citizens must whisper in the dark?

I say it must turn back.

I ask President Obama to do the right thing.

The United States must renounce its witch-hunt against WikiLeaks.

The United States must dissolve its FBI investigation.

The United States must vow that it will not seek to prosecute our staff or our supporters.

The United States must pledge before the world that it will not pursue journalists for shining a light on the secret crimes of the powerful.

There must be no more foolish talk about prosecuting any media organization, be it WikiLeaks or be it the New York Times.

The US administration’s war on whistleblowers must end.

Thomas Drake, and William Binney, and John Kiriakou and the other heroic US whistleblowers must — they must be pardoned and compensated for the hardships they’ve endured as servants of the public record.

And the Army Private who remains in a military prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, who was found by the United Nations to have endured months of torturous detention in Quantico, Virginia, and who has yet — after two years in prison — to see a trial—He must be released. Bradley Manning must be released. If Bradley Manning did as he accused, he is a hero and an example to all of us and one of the world’s foremost political prisoners. Bradley Manning must be released.

On Wednesday, Bradley Manning spent his 815^th day of detention without trial. The legal maximum is 120 days.

On Thursday, my friend, Nabeel Rajab, president of the Bahrain Human Rights Center, was sentenced to 3 years for a tweet.

On Friday, a Russian band [Pussy Riot] was sentenced to 2 years in jail for a political performance.

There is unity in the oppression.

There must be absolute unity and determination in the response.

Thank you.

Key witness in Julian Assange case was lying as an FBI informant to get off charges of sexual crime against kids

How the US handles legal issues, it lies, and tortures it's targets, and uses fraudulent witnesses to boost their case.

By Dark Politricks

Get the full article here on stundin.is

A major witness in the United States’ Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to fabricating key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks founder. The witness, who has a documented history with sociopathy and has received several convictions for sexual abuse of minors and wide-ranging financial fraud, made the admission in a newly published interview in Stundin where he also confessed to having continued his crime spree whilst working with the Department of Justiceand FBI and receiving a promise of immunity from prosecution.

The man in question, Sigurdur Ingi Thordarson, was recruited by US authorities to build a case against Assange after misleading them to believe he was previously a close associate of his. In fact he had volunteered on a limited basis to raise money for Wikileaks in 2010 but was found to have used that opportunity to embezzle more than $50,000 from the organization. Julian Assange was visiting Thordarson’s home country of Iceland around this time due to his work with Icelandic media and members of parliament in preparing the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, a press freedom project that produced a parliamentary resolution supporting whistleblowers and investigative journalism. 

The United States is currently seeking Assange’s extradition from the United Kingdom in order to try him for espionage relating to the release of leaked classified documents. If convicted, he could face up to 175 years in prison. The indictment has sparked fears for press freedoms in the United States and beyond and prompted strong statements in support of Assange from Amnesty International, Reporters without borders, the editorial staff of the Washington Post and many others. 

US officials presented an updated version of an indictment against him to a Magistrate court in London last summer. The veracity of the information contained therein is now directly contradicted by the main witness, whose testimony it is based on.

No instruction from Assange

The court documents refer to Mr Thordarson simply as “Teenager” (a reference to his youthful appearance rather than true age, he is 28 years old) and Iceland as “NATO Country 1” but make no real effort to hide the identity of either. They purport to show that Assange instructed Thordarson to commit computer intrusions or hacking in Iceland. 

The aim of this addition to the indictment was apparently to shore up and support the conspiracy charge against Assange in relation to his interactions with Chelsea Manning. Those occurred around the same time he resided in Iceland and the authors of the indictment felt they could strengthen their case by alleging he was involved in illegal activity there as well. This activity was said to include attempts to hack into the computers of members of parliament and record their conversations.

In fact, Thordarson now admits to Stundin that Assange never asked him to hack or access phone recordings of MPs. His new claim is that he had in fact received some files from a third party who claimed to have recorded MPs and had offered to share them with Assange without having any idea what they actually contained. He claims he never checked the contents of the files or even if they contained audio recordings as his third party source suggested. He further admits the claim, that Assange had instructed or asked him to access computers in order to find any such recordings, is false.

Nonetheless, the tactics employed by US officials appear to have been successful as can be gleaned from the ruling of Magistrate Court Judge Vanessa Baraitser on January 4th of this year. Although she ruled against extradition, she did so purely on humanitarian grounds relating to Assange’s health concerns, suicide risk and the conditions he would face in confinement in US prisons. With regards to the actual accusations made in the indictment Baraitser sided with the arguments of the American legal team, including citing the specific samples from Iceland which are now seriously called into question.

Other misleading elements can be found in the indictment, and later reflected in the Magistrate’s judgement, based on Thordarson’s now admitted lies. One is a reference to Icelandic bank documents. The Magistrate court judgement reads: “It is alleged that Mr. Assange and Teenager failed a joint attempt to decrypt a file stolen from a “NATO country 1” bank”.

Thordarson admits to Stundin that this actually refers to a well publicised event in which an encrypted file was leaked from an Icelandic bank and assumed to contain information about defaulted loans provided by the Icelandic Landsbanki. The bank went under in the fall of 2008, along with almost all other financial institutions in Iceland, and plunged the country into a severe economic crisis. The file was at this time, in summer of 2010, shared by many online who attempted to decrypt it for the public interest purpose of revealing what precipitated the financial crisis. Nothing supports the claim that this file was even “stolen” per se, as it was assumed to have been distributed by whistle-blowers from inside the failed bank.

More deceptive language emerges in the aforementioned judgment where it states: “...he [Assange] used the unauthorized access given to him by a source, to access a government website of NATO country-1 used to track police vehicles.”

This depiction leaves out an important element, one that Thordarson clarifies in his interview with Stundin. The login information was in fact his own and not obtained through any nefarious means. In fact, he now admits he had been given this access as a matter of routine due to his work as a first responder while volunteering for a search and rescue team. He also says Assange never asked for any such access.

Revealing chat logs

Thordarson spoke with a journalist from Stundin for several hours as he prepared a thorough investigative report into his activities that include never before published chat logs and new documents.

The chat logs were gathered by Thordarson himself and give a comprehensive picture of his communications whilst he was volunteering for Wikileaks in 2010 and 11. It entails his talks with WikiLeaks staff as well as unauthorized communications with members of international hacking groups that he got into contact with via his role as a moderator on an open IRC WikiLeaks forum, which is a form of live online chat. There is no indication WikiLeaks staff had any knowledge of Thordarson’s contacts with aforementioned hacking groups, indeed the logs show his clear deception. 

The communications there show a pattern where Thordarson is constantly inflating his position within WikiLeaks, describing himself as chief of staff, head of communications, No 2 in the organization or responsible for recruits. In these communications Thordarson frequently asks the hackers to either access material from Icelandic entities or attack Icelandic websites with so-called DDoS attacks. These are designed to disable sites and make them inaccessible but not cause permanent damage to content.

Stundin cannot find any evidence that Thordarson was ever instructed to make those requests by anyone inside WikiLeaks. Thordarson himself is not even claiming that, although he explains this as something Assange was aware of or that he had interpreted it so that this was expected of him. How this supposed non-verbal communication took place he cannot explain.

Furthermore, he never explained why WikiLeaks would be interested in attacking any interests in Iceland, especially at such a sensitive time while they were in the midst of publishing a huge trove of US diplomatic cables as part of an international media partnership. Assange is not known to have had any grievances with Icelandic authorities and was in fact working with members of parliament in updating Iceland’s freedom of press laws for the 21st century. 

On the FBI radar

Thordarson's rogue acts were not limited to communications of that nature as he also admits to Stundin that he set up avenues of communication with journalists and had media pay for lavish trips abroad where he misrepresented himself as an official representative of WikiLeaks.

He also admits that he stole documents from WikiLeaks staff by copying their hard drives. Among those were documents from Renata Avila, a lawyer who worked for the organization and Mr. Assange.

Thordarson continued to step up his illicit activities in the summer of 2011 when he established communication with “Sabu”, the online moniker of Hector Xavier Monsegur, a hacker and a member of the rather infamous LulzSec hacker group. 

In that effort all indications are that Thordarson was acting alone without any authorization, let alone urging, from anyone inside WikiLeaks.

Read the rest of the article at stundin.is.

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks

Here we go again and again - US Election

The US Presidential Election 2020

By Dark Politricks

 

Is the upcoming election in the US yet another choice between one bad option and another?

 

Is it as bad as 2016?

 

A choice between warmongering Hillary and her email scandals, Libyan secret weapon deals with Syrian Terrorists, a crime bill that locked up millions of people on small drug charges, all on top of her husbands sexual crimes. That plus the corrupt Clinton Foundation that had the DNC in it's grips so it could push out a worthy opponent that might have actually beaten Trump.

 

Or was the multiple bankrupt, narcissistic, porn star shagging, Tweet obsessed, despot loving, apparent white supremacist and labelled Russian stooge Donald Trump really the better choice 4 years ago?

 

This election certainly isn't one between two oppressing ideologies, anything left or right of the middle has all been squashed out. Bernie Sanders refused to fight for the right to have people vote for him, knowing that the DNC would be implementing the same dirty tactics as 2016 he should have ran as an independent. Maybe even hooking up with Jill Stein from the Green party. 

 

At least you would have had a proper choice to make, One between an ideology of wealth and tax breaks to the rich, money spent on the military but not education or health, and one between the Constitution, Bill of Rights versus the new US Security State. Anti constitutional bills that have continued long past any emergency measures they were enacted for, still exist in the US, laws such as the PATRIOT ACT and NDAA.

 

Instead the US citizens have two old, potentially both senile, white men who can't even have a civil debate live on television to pick from instead.

 

No other party is allowed in these debates no matter if they have their names on the ballots. It is a rigged showpiece rolled out every 4 years to give the population some semblance of democracy and vague notions of having some form of control over their lives by using the ballot box.

 

 

No wonder the USA is 2 countries divided. ANTIFA, Black Lives Matter, White Supremacists, "The Police and the Bikers" - as Trump once said he had in his corner. The country is ripe for uproar, but has it at any time been anything different?

 

From the early foundation of the US with Slavery, to the initial racist anti-drug laws to Bill & Hillary Clinton's mass incarceration of the poor and coloured with the 1994 Crime Bill. The left is no different from the right in the US. 

 

The real left is way outside anything the Democratic party would tolerate, even Obama with his majority win and control over both houses in the early part of his 1st term didn't do anything to help people of his own colour, the poor or the uneducated. All prime victims of the private prison industry who requires constant inmates and longer sentences so that they can make money with their free labour force of prison workers. 

 

We all saw how the Democratic party treated Bernie Sanders in the last election to know they are not a real left wing party no matter how much Republicans like to call them "Commies".

So is the election of ex Vice President and flip flopping Joe Biden, someone who obviously has skeletons in his closet like Trump and every previous President really a better choice than Hillary? Having dirt on the POTUS is a basic requirement, all so the the real power brokers can control them. Is this the type of politics that is going to change the US for the better? 

I don't care for either of them, just like I didn't care for Hillary or Trump in 2016. Whether Russia influenced the election, by aiding Trump with loans or letting him have intel on Hillary or not it matters little.

 

Most rational people now know that it was just a few Facebook memes, and that there was no real Russian conspiracy. If anyone really influenced the 2016 election it would have been by hacking known compromised voting machines or by scrubbing out votes from people of colour. Either that or by "accidentally" losing postal votes, not counting independents or by changing the maps to make it harder for people from certain districts to access a ballot box. If so then it was Americans not the Russians committing election fraud.

Blame the politicians for redistricting and voter suppression but not Russia, the Mueller investigation didn't manage to impeach him and left the raving Russian conspiracy theorists like Rachel Maddow who gave over most of her TV show to the subject for almost two years, dumbfounded. 

I just watched the first 2 episodes of "The Comey Rule" and it certainly suggests that the Russians managed to plant "their" stooge into the white house. They even showed a sinister scene where two Russian men, drank vodka by a fountain and congratulated themselves on their accomplishment. Artistic license, real facts, or maybe liberal writers trying to stir up the fake conspiracy claims from the last election just as the latest is taking place? 

 

Who knows, does it even matter. The first casualty of an election just like war, is always the truth.

And please don't call me a Russian Fake News spreading dis-info agent in the pocket of George Soros. I may think slightly higher of the Russians than some people but I am not calling them the beacon of liberty either. 

 

However can you really say the USA, still under 20yr old emergency powers that removed Habeas Corpus, enacted mass wire tapping of the citizens by the NSA, and still uses secret Security Letters to shut up whistle blowers, the signs of a shining beacon of liberty that the USA likes to believe it is?

This is before any COVID19 laws that have reduced our population into "yes sir", stand in line idiots not capable of thinking for themselves as the Governments of our countries do everything they can to prolong the lock downs, the restrictions on movement and giving the police powers to break into houses without warrants on suspicion that someone with COVID might be inside.

 

This is the USA, where drunk men on holiday claim I would be speaking German if it wasn't for them. No actually it was the Russian's who lost 40 million at the least, who won WWII by defeating the Germans, liberating Berlin and then preparing to invade Japan from the west.

 

Sorry, it wasn't your Little and Big Boy nukes that won the war by killing innocents. The Japanese had lost Tokyo and many other cities to fire bombing. Hiroshima was just a quicker annihilation. Debate the merits of murdering half a million people with one bomb against the fire bombing of German and Japanese cities and the  slow torture and murder of concentration camp workers. What really is the difference apart from the body count of non combatants?  

 

The USA still has the unenviable title of being the only country to "admittedly" use nuclear weapons on innocent civilians during wartime. Congratulations.

 

I will of course happily admit the Russians weren't the nicest of liberators, raping and killing the citizens of Berlin who had sent their own sons to torch them on the Eastern front with flame throwers and other exotic weapons. Churchill and Truman were quick to turn on their wartime ally after picking the cream of the NAZI scientists they wanted to help start NASA and use their Mengele methods in CIA projects like MKULTRA.

 

Is this the reason my little blog, posts written by myself has been put on a list of 550 sites including Alex Jones Info Wars, Antiwar.com, Russia Today and Press Today as sites that the establishment want to ban you for looking at. I must take it as a badge of honour. Being labelled as a blogger you shouldn't read is so 1984. Shame we have already gone past Orwell's imagination and then some.

However back to the 2016 election fall out and one of the victims has to be the founder of Wikileaks. Whether you think Julian Assange is a hero or a villain, he certainly doesn't deserve to be left rotting in the high security Belmarsh prison whilst waiting for extradition to the US. 

 

I vaguely remember in one Presidential speech in 2016 Trump actually thanked Wikileaks for revealing the emails which leaked info from DNC. From ensuring the Bernie Sanders campaign failed to the Podesta emails and details on the Libyan Embassy attacks, I do recall Trump on stage asking for more revelations to come from Assange.

 

So I wonder if (or when), Julian Assange gets extradited and Trump is re-elected, whether Trump will thank Assange by giving him a pardon. I doubt it. That's the way it goes, speak truth to power and you get a kicking. I feel sorry for him and I hope you all do. Nothing that he has printed has been proven to be false and does it really matter who gave him the information that he leaked, if it brought to attention news of illegal war crimes, election rigging and perversions that you hadn't been aware about?

 

If Julian Assange is to be left to rot in an orange jump suit in the US, and possibly disposed of just like Jeffery Epstein, then surely the editors at the Guardian and other papers who published his data should be on trial as well? 

 

Is it really fair to only label only old school tree killing papers as the only "real journalists", or can't a blogger or website not compete at the same level with the same protections? 

 

I only have to look in my local shop at he papers to see how bipartisan our papers are. One paper reveals that Tory PM, Boris Johnson's Father was caught breaking the law by not wearing a mask in a shop and the paper next to it accuses ex Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn of breaking the rules by having more than 6 people at a dinner. Can you really say that this BS pro right or left wing news is any different from blogs or sites that like to criticise politics from different angles than the norm?

Was it really easier for supposed Russian agents to hack and steal thousands of GB of data from DNC servers, when it was more likely that someone inside the DNC just downloaded data and passed them onto Wikileaks by a thumb drive?

 

You just had to see how affected Julian Assange was when he appeared on the Bill Maher show and offered a $20,000 reward for any information on the death of DNC worker Seth Rich.to know that somehow the two were connected. Seth Rich, a DNC operator, supposedly killed for no reason, nothing robbed, nothing stolen, just another ignored death that can be easily connected to the Clinton's wrath.Why has no-one really put 2 and 2 together. 

 

You may call me a conspiracy theorist but I would rather believe that rich and powerful people control our lives on purpose rather than believe all the coincidences that just magically occur at the same time to achieve a certain goal. Nothing happens on accident when it comes to global politics. Wars are planned and then excuses found, if not created, when it comes to pushing the populace one way or another.

 

Bill and Hillary Clinton have been co-workers with the Bush Crime Family since the CIA were smuggling coke to then Governor Bill Clinton's Arkansas Mena Airport. Weapons south to Nicaraguan death squads, coke smuggled north by Barry Seal for the CIA, all so that Freeway Ricky Ross could sell it in LA. This was the root cause of the Crack epidemic of the 80's, and the failed War on Drugs that the CIA helped supply the nation with. The Clinton and Bush crime families are joined at the hip.

 

When it comes to drugs there really is nothing worse than a hypocrite politician who is happy to incarcerate millions for doing exactly what they do themselves. Bill Clinton was a cocaine vacuum cleaner claimed his brother Roger, and George and Jeb Bush were caught picking up their own supply of coke at Mena airport. Obama liked driving round in limo's smoking crack, god knows what Ronald Reagan was into, Quaaludes maybe?

 

The author of the "Dark Alliance" expose on this CIA link, Gary Webb, was found dead with 2 gunshots to the head and it was ruled a suicide, as were other people on the list of "Clinton linked" witnesses, accusers and whistle-blowers who have been found dead in suspicious circumstances . I guess it's quite common for people to try to kill themselves with a pistol, blow half their brains out, not die but still have the mental and nervous capacity to pull the trigger a second time. Should Gary Webb be added along with Seth Rich to the Clinton kill list maybe?

 

So back to the beginning, what will change in the US if Biden wins the election. Will the world spin the other way the next day, will liberty flourish once again in the Western world? 

 

That is of course that an election actually takes place and COVID19 laws and "health considerations" are not brought in to separate the mile long lines at voting polls where everyone must stand 2 metres back from those in-front of them. 

 

Trump and half the White House and members of his team now have the infection after a lawn party in which no-one wore masks as they all hugged each other with socially distancing the farthest thing from their minds. With the POTUS now ill it not only gains sympathy for him, but allows him to not participate in more awful debates and provide potential excuses for not campaigning if he loses the election. 

 

Whether Trump wins or Biden does, it doesn't really matter, just like in every binary US election, whoever wins they will continue to do all of the following:

 

Be beholden to big interests and string pullers behind the scenes. Whether Wall St, lobbyists for private prisons, big pharma, and of course the Military Industrial Complex. Either politician will continue any wars they are already engaged in and possibly extend the US Empire some more. Whoever is up for election I sure don't see any peace makers, despite ludicrous nominations for both Trump and Biden to get a Nobel Peace Prize.  

 

Obama was awarded one when the world fell for the "hope and change" we all desperately wanted, then sat back and watched as he expanded US wars of terror, and implemented unconstitutional laws. He kept Gitmo open despite promising to close it and continued the unfair policy of backing Israel in every UN vote through the use of a veto. That is apart from his last which he "bravely" abstained on his way out of office.

 

It takes "real balls" to wait until Bibi and Israel can't blackmail you anymore and it doesn't actually matter to abstain from a UN vote on Israel Palestine relations. If the Nobel committee had any pride they would demand that Nobel Peace medal back.

Obama's UN vote obviously caused shock and horror across the pro-Zionist world, Obama was even labelled the most anti-Israeli President ever despite no real attempt to settle the Palestinian issue. However much Trump is pro Israel, and considered an idiot or geographical dunce, he hasn't actually declared war on a country within his first term. This doesn't make him a peace maker for Nobel to prematurely award a peace prize to though. Even Hitler was nominated for a Nobel Peace award in 1939.

 

So whether the black ops teams are fighting in new areas in Africa, fomenting coups in South America or still smuggling drugs from Afghanistan, the USA hasn't actually officially expanded the war on terror despite the expectations of many. 

 

There were early issues over Syria, watching the US Media get wet over Trump ordering bombing raids was sickening. “I think Donald Trump became president of the United States last night” said Fareed Zakaria, host of CNN’s flagship foreign affairs program, after one Syrian bombing attack. 

 

Fox even played Country music about Freedom as Trump ordered the largest non nuclear bomb to be dropped in Afghanistan. What did Fox anchor Ainsley Earhardt say about it? “That video’s black and white, but that is what freedom looks like... That’s the red, white and blue.” - Yes I'm afraid your right, that is the red white and blue and you should be ashamed of continuing a war against the tribal people of one of the poorest countries on earth. 

 

A populace never defeated in war, not the British Empire on multiple attempts, not the Soviets or even Alexander the Great. No-one has managed to defeat and subdue the poor Afghans for centuries. Is the US really still there to fight al-Qaeda or are they just wasting money fighting people who just want them to leave them alone?

 

What really is the point of firing $500k+ missiles into mud huts that these people live in apart from furnishing the MIC's pockets. 92% of the people in Afghanistan when interviewed had never even heard of 9.11 or the WTC attacks. 

 

They are just fighting yet another invading enemy just as they have done for 1000's of years. However they do grow the most Opium in the world, a currency the CIA has been involved in since their creation. From the Golden Triangle to Colombia to the Vietnam war, the US has always been heavily involved with drug smuggling.

Then there's the other attempt by the US using their ex enemy / GLADIO 2 Jihadist fighters to other-throw another Russian ally in Syria. However it was Russia that actually came and cleared up ISIS, something the US/UK/French/Israeli Axis of War powers never managed, or really wanted to do. The pretend moderate fighters were just as evil as the radical Jihadists. Even the Free Syrian Army was full of al-Qaeda types willing to cut open dead soldiers bodies to eat their hearts on video for all the world to see.  

 

Syria was on the list of countries General Wesley Clarke was told that the US was going to other-throw after the 9.11 attacks along with Iran. We are still waiting for the US/Israeli move to attack Iran, despite Israeli pressure behind the scenes to get the US to do their bidding again. They managed to get US soldiers to die for their cause with Libya and Iraq and probably a lot more died in Syria than we will ever hear about. 

 

Will Joe Biden be the next Zionist President to turn the Middle East into a bush fire again?

 

I'm just glad that somehow Trump hasn't caused WWIII yet, whether Biden will do just as good a job making the US look like the war mongers they are will be for the future to report on. However I cannot see how Biden would be a better President than if Hillary had been elected in 2016.

 

The Democrats are NOT the party of peace, they are just another side of the two headed coin that rules the most aggressive and powerful surveillance state in the world after China. 

Whoever comes in as President will undoubtedly continue to hold onto those precious 9.11 laws brought in when the 3 WTC skyscrapers fell due to just 2 planes hitting them. I remember during the Obama years when Trump was all over the news asking for the redacted 28/29 9.11 Commission papers to be revealed. Once released however little noise was ever made by the MSM or US Government about their contents.

I am guessing most Americans don't even know what these redacted pages the Saudi's lobbied and paid to have removed from the 9.11 "Omission Report", told us about their funding of the terrorist patsies used in the 9.11 attacks. 

 

Trump made sure to bow as low as he criticised Obama for doing, in front of the King of Oil / New home of sporting events in the desert. Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman is trying to Sportswash the Kingdom that continues to jail and lash female rape victims as adulterers and murder and massacre innocent Yemeni children with illegal weapons with US support. 

 

Trump gave MBS the benefit of the doubt despite evidence to the contrary when they hacked a US journalist up alive inside a Turkish embassy. Will Joe Biden be so accommodating to their Petrodollar ally?

 

Whatever changes with a new face in power won't make the slightest bit of difference to most of America or the world who look to the US for leadership. The US Congress, Senate and President will all continue to allow AIPAC and Dual Citizens control their actions when it comes to their continued dismantling of any hope of a two state solution in Palestine/Israel.

 

The MIC will continue to make billions from the existing wars in Afghanistan, and the private security corporations that have replaced US troops in Iraq will be cashing in cheques for years to come. 

 

New skirmishes in the never ending war on terror will continue, and the American people will still not question how it is that al-Qaeda, the supposed terrorists behind 9.11, became their allies in Syria when it suited the US for them to do so.

 

Questions about 9.11 and the possibility of a plane made of aluminum that cannot fly 550mph inches above the ground vertically before punching through 3 ringed walls at the Pentagon remain. The CIA whistle blower who on his death bed admitted to helping demolish WTC7 in NYC will continue to be ignored by the MSM and other whistle blowers like Sibel Edmonds smeared when they claim they knew the CIA had relations with bin-Laden right up to 9.11. 

 

No-one will ask loudly why most of the people rounded up in the days after the attacks were mostly Israeli not Arab. These people were held for weeks before all being deported on VISA violations. Will anyone in power even question why Mossad sent a team to "document the event", as they themselves told an Israeli TV audience. 

 

How did they know what to document if they didn't know the attacks were going to happen?

 

Oh well I must be an anti-Semite for raising legitimate questions about Israeli involvement in the event that has turned the first 20 years of the 21st century into one of endless war abroad, and at home a police state environment where the NSA spies on you at every opportunity.

 

Well I have rattled on for as long as I could about the ever so important decision you in the US must make. It doesn't just affect you, it affects the whole world, more some than others but the tentacles of American power are long and far reaching

 

However if you really think electing Joe Biden will stop the wars, reverse the spying, end police brutality and Government invasion of privacy then please inform me how this is going to actually happen?

By Dark Politricks

 

© 2020 Dark Politricks